...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Tiskilwa

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the wake of a traumatic dog bite injury, you need comprehensive legal representation to safeguard your rights. That’s where Carlson Bier steps in as a leading personal injury lawyer firm specializing in dog bite cases in Illinois. They offer unrivaled expertise and devotion, serving clients diligently throughout Tiskilwa and beyond by providing professional and compassionate service tailored to specific needs. Suffering from a life-altering event such as a severe dog bite necessitates not just any lawyer, but one practiced within this unique field with the intricate knowledge required. Choosing Carlson Bier guarantees you’re represented by professionals who are skilled at navigating complex situations related to these distressing injuries while upholding your best interests for maximum compensation. Their vast experience determines winning strategies that rest on evidence-based arguments crafted with precision for each individual case detail. Don’t face the aftermath of a dog bite injury alone; trust Carlson Bier: because when it comes to retrieving justice following horrible experiences like these ones, they never bark – only bite!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Tiskilwa Illinois

At Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys, we understand that suffering a dog bite injury can be not only physically painful but also mentally distressing. We prioritize your wellness and recovery while vigorously representing your legal interests.

Situated in Illinois, our team of experienced attorneys specializes in personal injury cases involving dog bites and other animal attacks. Our comprehensive understanding of the laws surrounding such incidents allows us to adeptly navigate the complexities of these claims to secure just compensation for our clients.

Dog bites can result in myriad injuries encompassing minor abrasions, deep puncture wounds, severe lacerations to bone fractures or even life-threatening infections. Here are some key points on the potential after-effects;

• Scarring or disfigurement: Serious bites may lead to lasting physical scars which could necessitate cosmetic surgery.

• Emotional trauma: Victims often experience post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression or phobias due to a pet attack.

• Infections: Rabies is a fatal disease transmitted through canine saliva while dangerous bacterial infections like Pasteurella multocida and Capnocytophaga can cause debilitating conditions.

Moreover, each case presents unique challenges related to determining liability, insurance coverage issues, and dispute over the breed or viciousness of the culprit dog. At Carlson Bier, we meticulously analyze each circumstance’s nuances; work diligently making sure every facet of your claim is given its deserved attention.

It’s noteworthy that under Section 16 of The Animal Control Act – Illinois law stipulates strict liability on owners for injuries caused by their pets deemed “dangerous” or had shown previous unfriendly behavior towards people. This essentially means victims generally do not have a duty to establish negligence on part of the pet owner if they were peaceably conducting themselves in a location where they had lawful rights when attacked.

Compensation obtained from a successful lawsuit typically covers medical expenses incurred-surgery costs, hospital stays, prescriptions; income lost due to work absence; disability or impairment suffered, pain and suffering. Also worth considering are future prediction costs such as psychological counseling fees, ongoing rehabilitation care.

Our attorneys leverage their exemplary negotiation skills and extensive courtroom experience to argue your case compellingly for the highest possible settlement. Throughout the process, we remain committed advocates for victims of dog bit accidents with keen attention to eradicating any misconceptions perpetuated by insurance companies minimizing liability.

Implemented in every Carlson Bier client partnership is a policy of open dialogue. By maintaining continuous communication about claim progress updates and legal strategic planning ensures our clients are well-advised enabling informed decisions – reflecting our commitment to compassionate advocacy juxtaposed against powerful litigation.

Navigating this complex landscape alone can amplify your anxiety levels; it’s critical you concentrate on healing while we take on the responsibilities associated with fighting for your rights. It’s also crucial that you understand your rights under Illinois law immediately after a dog bite occurrence – waiting could jeopardize your potential compensation – hence contacting an experienced personal injury attorney is often advised.

To make our expertise more accessible, Carlson Bier offers no-obligation initial consultations where we provide personalized evaluation based upon examination of all aspects of one’s individual circumstances; discussing merits of potential claims without charging any fee until we win the claim for you – underscoring our pledge towards ensuring access to justice for all.

We invite you now to delve deeper into how much your case could be worth by clicking the button below. Trust Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys with helping restore balance amidst turbulent times post a dog bite incident – delivering comprehensive legal solutions through insightful advice underscored by robust representation in Illinois.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Tiskilwa Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Tiskilwa

Areas of Practice in Tiskilwa

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Burn Traumas

Providing specialist legal assistance for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Offering experienced legal representation for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal guidance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Fall Incidents

Professional in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Injuries

Supplying legal guidance for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting victims of car accidents obtain appropriate payout for harms and damages.

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

18-Wheeler Collision

Ensuring expert legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for hurts.

Building Crashes

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Brain Traumas

Expert in offering specialized legal support for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in managing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Focused on representing victims with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​