FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Trenton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Dog bite injuries can be devastating, causing both physical trauma and emotional distress. If you or your loved one are unfortunate victims of such incidents in Trenton, trust Carlson Bier for legal support. Highly proficient in handling dog bite injury cases under Illinois law, our attorneys empathize with your adversity and strive to obtain maximum compensation for all inflicted damages. Our team implements an exhaustive approach, using stringent investigation techniques to collect critical evidence immensely contributing towards case fortification. We calculate actual losses – medical expenses, loss of income during recovery time – as well as potential future costs involved considering the severity of the injuries before presenting a claim. Furthermore, at Carlson Bier we are adamant advocates against insurance company tactics aiming to reduce or refuse rightful claims made by victims of animal aggression mishaps like dog bites.Peace comes when justice is served right: let us help guide you through this demanding process with uncompromising professionalism at every step till justice prevails! Choose Carlson Bier; quality representation is OUR commitment!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Trenton Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases of all kinds, and one area where we offer a comprehensive range of services is Dog Bite Injuries. We recognize that dog attacks can result in both physical impairment and mental trauma which can be severe and long-lasting. Residents across Illinois trust Carlton Bier for our deep-seated knowledge in handling personal injury lawsuits related to animal attacks.

Dealing with the aftermath of a dog bite injury is painful; physically, emotionally as well as financially. The medical expenses can skyrocket quickly, not to mention the value of lost wages if you’re unable to work during recovery. Often there are emotional damages too; a fear of dogs or even going outside could be ingrained following such traumatic incidents. Depending on the severity and extensiveness of these injuries, the demand for compensation can justifiably escalate.

Some critical aspects regarding Dog Bite Injuries:

• Variations in Injury: Dog bites may lead to different types of possible injuries like puncture wounds, lacerations, infections, fractures or emotional suffering.

• Liability: A critical factor determining liability involves proving that the dog owner was aware or should have been aware their pet possesses potentially aggressive characteristics.

• Negotiating with Insurance Companies: Most homeowner’s insurance policies cover dog bite incidents. Still, often insurance companies try to negotiate settlements for less than the claim’s actual worth.

The team of experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier have earned renown across Illinois for tenacious oratory skills coupled with empathetic client interactions – an essential cocktail towards successful legal proceedings involving personal injuries such as those incurred from canine-inflicted attacks.

Our process is driven by thorough research into every available shred of information about each case specific situation along with adhering stringently to deadlines involved in filing necessary documents within permissible limits prescribed under state legislation. Our dedicated staff leaves no stone unturned fighting professional battles armed with trustworthy facts based on diligent groundwork which makes allegations virtually irrefutable.

No one should have to suffer due to a dog owner’s negligence. We firmly believe in the rights of every individual who has suffered a dog bite injury and our legal strategies are always tailored towards assisting victims gain maximum possible compensation from guilty parties against personal injuries inflicted under such non-fault occurrences.

Even though we’re massive advocates for access to rightful compensation, it’s important you are aware of the laws impacting such cases in Illinois. The state operates on a “strict liability” law where the dog owner is held responsible if their pet bites someone without provocation while they were legally allowed to be present at that location, irrespective of whether the animal had shown aggressive behavior or tendencies before or even bitten anyone earlier.

At Carlson Bier, we strive continuously towards securing justice coupled with maximum financial recovery through fair and fast settlements. However, we are also ready when required to take such cases through full trial proceedings for ensuring ultimate victory against unjust circumstances inhibiting peaceful living conditions free from fear of sudden unexpected aggression from domesticated animals owned by irresponsible custodians uninformed regarding potential hazards involved in inadequately controlling their four-legged pets.

At Carlson Bier, your well-being is what matters most to us; rest assured that our expert team works tirelessly advocating your right toward recouping deserved compensations under established state legislative provisions governing Dog Bite Injuries delivering promising results based on proven past track records accumulated across several years serving demanding personalized legal needs spanning diverse array of clients facing variant levels of complexities implicated within different personal injury cases.

Discover how much your case could be worth by clicking below now – because justice delayed can very often mean justice denied. At Carlton Beer, our seasoned attorneys stand committed toward alleviating concern over interpretation about intricate legalities revolving around laws related specifically towards Dog Bite Injury compensatory rules enforced across Illinois scrambling expeditiously till destination achievement since initiation phases progressing optimizing realizable damages recoverable permitted legally permissible state regulations contributing increased positive outcomes conclusively. So why wait? The first step towards your rightful claim is just a click away!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

[trustindex no-registration=google]

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Trenton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Trenton

Areas of Practice in Trenton

Cycling Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Providing expert legal assistance for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Medical Malpractice

Delivering specialist legal support for victims affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Fault

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal guidance to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Slip Mishaps

Expert in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Damages

Providing legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents gain just compensation for injuries and destruction.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal services for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering specialist legal services for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Worksite Collisions

Dedicated to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Neurological Harms

Focused on extending compassionate legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in addressing cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Focused on legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and experienced legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Specializing in representing clients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​