FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Valier

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the complexities of a spinal cord injury claim can be challenging, an essential reason to consider Carlson Bier as your legal partner. Our dedicated team in Illinois is well-versed in representing and advocating for individuals with spinal cord injuries. We specialize in understanding intricate medical details and have developed proven strategies that maintain dedication to our client’s health while securing the financial compensation they deserve. Utilizing years of experience handling personal injury claims gives us a distinct advantage; we are intimately familiar with challenges specific to spinal injuries, appreciating their long-term implications on lifestyle alterations and associated costs beyond initial medical care. By choosing Carlson Bier, you will align yourself with attorneys who demonstrate exceptional negotiation skills, favorable settlement history, and readiness to go trial if necessary – pursuing justice relentlessly while supporting you through every step towards recovery. Remember – when it comes to safeguarding your rights after a serious injury like this one, partnering with experienced specialists like those at Carlson Bier should always sit top of mind.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Valier Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we strive relentlessly for the pursuit of justice, and one area where our dedication shines is in handling cases involving spinal cord injuries. Spinal cord injuries can be overwhelming to deal with, both emotionally and physically. It’s an upheaval not just for those injured but also for their loved ones who are thrown into a world of uncertainties about the future. This firm brings its extensive experience to bear on this front as well.

Spinal cord injuries often result from accidents or traumatic incidences such as motor vehicle mishaps, falls, or acts of violence among other causes. The reverberations are manifold – loss of mobility and sensation being just the tip of the iceberg.

• The highest impact is typically seen as complete or incomplete paralysis which could manifest either as paraplegia (where the lower limbs are affected) or quadriplegia (affecting all four limbs).

• Aside from obvious physical disability that accompanies spinal cord injury, there may be subtle yet profound implications on psychological, emotional, social dimensions culminating even in bouts of depression.

To ensure multiple angles are covered in your lawsuit claim preparation process related to spinal cord injury it important to collaborate with experts armed with a wide spectrum understanding and decades-long legal prowess– Carlson Bier fits that definition ideally.

Our legal team at Carlson Bier embraces each case with undying commitment emerging from genuine empathy for the victims along with an unwavering resolve to deliver them justice they fervently seek.

Whilst confronting such complex situations vis-à-vis spinal cord injuries one must proactively consider several crucial aspects:

• Sizable lawsuit settlements that encompass not just immediate medical expenses but account for ongoing rehabilitation costs including physical therapy sessions over potentially prolonged periods

• Necessity for modifying living spaces or vehicles

• Potential need for round-the-clock nursing care at home

Having Carlson Bier by your side will help to leave no stone unturned. We will team with you to review each aspect in detail so no facet of the resultant adversities or needed support is overlooked.

Also, it’s paramount in such challenging situations that victims choose their legal representatives circumspectly since any claim made requires shrewd ironclad decisions and exceptional aptitude for negotiations.

• Ensuring the solicitor has adequate expertise specific to spinal cord injuries

• A proven track record of success i.e., high-worth settlement attorneys

Working diligently toward getting deserving clients every penny they are owed, Carlson Bier is an authoritative figure within the Illinois personal injury law sector, particularly when addressing spinal cord injuries cases – a fact that can be continually witnessed via our ever-growing list of satisfied clientele. Employing hard-nosed negotiation skills at right volumes in conjunction with employing prudently designed strategies based on evidence has been instrumental to our ever-increasing successes here at Carlson Bier.

A profound understanding backed by comprehensive experience allows us at Carlson Bier to knowingly navigate complex networks involved in pursuing potential defendants along with their insurance companies ensuring your case doesn’t get tangled up amid myriad complications. Proceed confidently ahead if you have sustained a spinal cord injury through no fault of yours and need solid assistance battling against convoluted legal procedures while trying tirelessly to qualify for suitable fair compensation that belongs rightfully to you.

As one explores options post facing such devastating circumstances, remember it’s not just about seeking justice; but about maneuvering head-on into a fresh life chapter where rightful compensation plays a crucial role bridging past adversities towards future possibilities. Address this challenge with confidence walking hand-in-hand alongside Illinois’ seasoned experts from Carlson Bier who’ll bring aboard rich experience stringed together synergistically with astute professionalism aimed at maximizing your claim beyond conceivable limits. Now is a good time as any to click on the button below & find out how much your case might potentially be worth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Valier Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Valier

Areas of Practice in Valier

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving expert legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Hospital Incompetence

Extending expert legal services for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal assistance to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Malpractice

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Tumble Accidents

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking redress for their injuries.

Infant Harms

Providing legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on helping clients of car accidents obtain reasonable payout for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Crashes

Specializing in providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Trucking Accident

Providing adept legal advice for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Concentrated on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Focused on extending dedicated legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Injuries

Specialized in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered damages from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and experienced legal assistance to ensure justice.

Backbone Impairment

Focused on representing individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​