...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Personal Injury Attorney in Vandalia

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Vandalia residents seeking skilled personal injury representation can confidently turn to Carlson Bier. Known for their dedication, proficiency, and integrity, this law firm has a remarkable record in dealing with personal injury cases across Illinois. Specializing in a diverse range of personal injury claims such as auto accidents, slip-and-falls or workplace injuries – they’re committed to fighting for your rights tirelessly. Decades of experience have equipped the team at Carlson Bier with extensive knowledge and unmatched expertise to navigate complex legal landscapes effectively. They strive passionately for justice on behalf of each client; unwaveringly advocating until fair compensation is received for loss endured from physical pain, emotional distress or wage lapse due to another’s negligence. The goal? To alleviate the burden an unforeseen accident can bring onto you and your family’s lives through comprehensive legal support that prioritizes your needs first above all else.When it comes down to finding steadfast advocacy in personal Injury litigation– Vandalia citizens trust Carlson Bier.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Vandalia Illinois

At Carlson Bier, the premier personal injury law firm in Illinois, we believe it’s your right to be informed about the intricacies of Personal Injury Law. It’s more than being represented by top-class attorneys – it’s about understanding your situation and how the system works.

One aspect people often misunderstand is how a mere accident can culminate into significant legal complications where Personal Injury Law plays its part. Simply put, if you suffered an injury that wasn’t your fault but due to someone else’s negligence or intentional act, you may be entitled to compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and other losses. Whether it involves car accidents, workplace mishaps or slip-and-fall incidents; this area of law aids those hurt by others’ negligence.

• Relevant Evidence: In such cases, providing evidence linking the defendant’s actions (or lack thereof) with your injuries is pivotal.

• Determination of Liability: Accurately pinpointing who was at fault becomes a critical step towards claiming rightful compensation

• Damages Assessment: A thorough evaluation of all associated costs incurred—both monetary and emotional—bolsters claims for recompense

Countless laws are governing personal injury matters in Illinois State – understanding them could be daunting even for seasoned attorneys let alone individuals like yourself! That’s precisely why we’re here offering our expert know-how and experience.

Of equal significance is deciding a suitable approach between litigation versus settlement. Some situations may require waiting before making any legal decisions while others necessitate swift action. Attorneys at Carlson Bier understand these nuances well and operate with appropriate timing– ensuring no potential claim slips through because of delayed response or unnecessary hurry.

In addition to navigating intricate case technicalities; seeking counsel from experienced attorneys can give you peace-of-mind knowing that dedicated professionals are tirelessly working on establishing liability, preserving evidence & accurately assessing damages on your behalf. Investing in competent legal representation thus underscores the difference between receiving full compensation vs. suffering an under-compensated loss owing to lack of legal knowledge.

At Carlson Bier you are partnering with personal injury attorneys who:

• Have solid experience and training in managing Personal Injury cases

• Uphold high ethical standards while ardently representing your interests

• Maintain clear communication throughout the process for your comfort & understanding

Whilst representing our clients, we uphold a deep sense of respect for your situations’ gravity all the while administering necessary effort and attention-to-detail required for optimally beneficial resolutions. We strive tirelessly to ensure that each case is meticulously studied before devising personalized strategies tuned towards achieving best possible outcomes.

Filing a personal injury claim isn’t merely about seeking compensation – it’s also about attaining justice. It’s about holding negligent individuals or entities accountable for their actions, thus bringing closure to involved parties while hopefully preventing similar occurrences in the future.

Standing by this philosophy, we appreciate your taking time today to advance your understanding of Personal Injury Law as applicable within Illinois state boundaries. Remember, learning is just one part of the equation; actually navigating through these complexities efficiently requires professional guidance—which is exactly where we come in!

At Carlson Bier, commitment meets expertise resulting in thoughtful evaluation and skillful representation – Every step on way towards securing rightful compensation resonates with our unyielding pursuit towards laboring for justice on behalf of victims enduring resultant distress due to someone else’s negligence or misconduct.

In such transformative times when unexpected injuries can lead not only to physical discomfort but also financial uncertainty; rest assured knowing that at Carlson Bier – Your cause becomes OUR mission!

Do you want to know how much merit there lies within your specific situation? Does understanding approximate worthiness linked with potential recompense pique your interest? If so then do not hesitate! Tap into our wellspring of experience right away by clicking on the button below. Realize exact worth tied-in with YOUR unique case circumstance – All free-of-charge, right now! Get in touch and let’s solve this together.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Vandalia Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Vandalia

Areas of Practice in Vandalia

Bicycle Crashes

Expert in legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Offering skilled legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Hospital Misconduct

Extending dedicated legal support for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Responsibility

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal support to clients affected by harmful products.

Aged Abuse

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble and Fall Incidents

Specialist in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal help for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on helping sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate compensation for wounds and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Big Rig Accident

Delivering specialist legal advice for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Worksite Accidents

Engaged in advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Harms

Focused on providing compassionate legal representation for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Committed to legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Fatality

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Damage

Focused on advocating for patients with paralysis, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​