FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Bicycle Accidents in Vernon Hills

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When encountering a bicycle accident in Vernon Hills, engaging Carlson Bier’s expertise is an exceptional choice. As distinguished personal injury attorneys, we specialize in bicycle accidents cases. Our commitment to achieving fair settlements and verdicts for our clients has solidified us as reliable advocates through the most complex legal battles concerning bike mishaps. Serving victims of vernacular cycling incidents who value their rights and entitlements under Illinois law, Carlson Bier goes the extra mile to ensure maximum compensation for injuries sustained or losses incurred from such unfortunate events. Navigating successfully within the legislative landscape requires profound knowledge – a qualification we proudly possess at this firm. In leveraging our team’s years of experience fighting for injured cyclists’ rights, you can confidently entrust your case into our capable hands as we strive towards justice with fervor and dedication; after all, battle-tested proficiency is a cornerstone of what makes Carlson Bier an exceptionally competent choice amongst personal injury attorneys dealing specifically with Bicycle Accidents.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Vernon Hills Illinois

Understanding the complexities and legalities of bicycle accidents can be overwhelming, especially for victims who are nursing physical injuries and emotional trauma. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with an emphasis on bicycle accident cases throughout Illinois. Our dedicated team has a deep-rooted knowledge of local laws and regulations that arms us with the tools necessary to support you through this challenging time.

If you’ve been involved in a bicycle accident, it’s crucial to remember the importance of prompt action. Timeliness is key when seeking assistance from an experienced attorney; doing so not only strengthens your case but also ensures adequate protection for your rights as an aggrieved party under Illinois law.

Key considerations following a bicycle accident include:

• Documenting the incident: A record of details about the accident becomes essential proof. If possible, procure photographs or videos from the scene.

• Seeking Medical Help: No matter how minor your injuries may seem, medical documentation aligns with proving damage done due to negligence

• Notifying Law Enforcement: It’s important to involve police officers immediately as their reports serve as substantial evidence

• Consulting an Attorney: Bringing us into your confidences soon after will aid our vigorous investigation process

Situated amidst these painful experiences rests one critical facet – understanding liability in your bicycle accident case. Unlike vehicle accidents, where traffic rules often dictate fault lines, bike incidents require intricate scrutiny of several factors like road conditions, adherence to bike laws by cyclists/drivers or even defective equipment issues.

Our experience spans across instances where clients were blamed unfairly owing to misconceptions around cyclist behavior. We leveraged our expertise at Arnold & Itkin to debunk biases resting upon helmet usage, cyclist age factor or drinking accusations that played against our client’s interests.

Carlson Bier boasts enviable success rates representing individuals who have been injured in specific types of accidents like hit-and-run collisions and ‘dooring’ scenarios (where car doors are opened abruptly into a biker’s path). We trust that our smart approach and intimate knowledge of bicycle laws will not only ease your worries but help you secure the reparation you deserve.

Trust us when we affirm, even if you shared part responsibility for your accident (due to lack of visibility, riding against traffic, etc), under Illinois’ comparative fault laws, a monetary recovery may still be within reach. Our dedicated injury attorneys are skilled in navigating these complex legal waters and ensuring you receive the maximum compensation possible.

While insurance companies prioritize quick settlements, often neglecting fair dues owed to victims; at Carlson Bier, your interests are sacrosanct. We invest our time and expertise into evaluating exhaustive financial implications like present/future medical costs or wage losses to make certain your rightful due is delivered.

Bicycle accidents can pose startling life changes in an instant – from unanticipated medical expenditures/long-term care needs or job loss – burdening already traumatized victims with uncertain future prospects. At Carlson Bier, compassion complements our professionalism. We’re driven by a dedication towards representing hard-hit families commendably—offering them legal solutions that reflect understanding, care and deep experience.

Remember, each case brings unique nuances; efficient navigation requires sophisticated know-how. Garnered through years serving Illinois residents with unwavering commitment coupled with our reputation for integrity and perseverance has made Carlson Bier a trusted choice for legal assistance post-bicycle tragedies.

If you’ve encountered a bicycle accident impacting yours or loved one’s lives adversely – please remember – You need not face this battle alone.

Click on the button below for free case evaluation by our expert team at Carlson Bier today—let us guide you through unfamiliar terrain assisting realization of what justice truly signifies & exploring potential compensation possibilities tailored specifically for your challenging situation. Let’s discuss how much your case is worth because it’s more than just about money; It’s reclaiming peace amidst chaos unleashed undeservingly upon your life by others’ negligence.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Vernon Hills Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Vernon Hills

Areas of Practice in Vernon Hills

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Offering skilled legal help for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Medical Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Slip Mishaps

Expert in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking justice for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Extending legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Incidents

Collisions: Devoted to helping victims of car accidents get just compensation for harms and losses.

Motorbike Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal support for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Mishap

Delivering specialist legal advice for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for losses.

Building Mishaps

Focused on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Neurological Traumas

Focused on delivering dedicated legal support for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at addressing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Specializing in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Loss

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Expert in supporting victims with paralysis, offering specialized legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440