Car Accidents in Vernon Hills

Car Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking representation for auto accident claims in Vernon Hills, consider the exceptional capabilities and track record of Carlson Bier. As seasoned personal injury attorneys well-versed in car accidents litigation, we understand that each case presents unique challenges and requires personalized attention. Our dedicated team provides meticulous analysis to ensure every detail, however miniscule it may seem, is diligently taken into account. By choosing Carlson Bier as your advocacy partner within this complex field of law, you are securing a results-driven approach backed by our commitment to client satisfaction. To us, you’re not just another case file – you’ll receive compassionate yet aggressive representation from lawyers with an acute understanding of car accident laws pertinent to Vernon Hills residents. Our primary aim is facilitating resolution in your favor while ensuring that the decision upholds your best interests at its core – financial recovery essential for medical bills or lost wages included. While we cannot undo the unfortunate fate met on roadways, let us help reinvigorate hope via justice served on legal platforms; choose Carlson Bier as your Car Accident litigators today.

About Carlson Bier

Car Accidents Lawyers in Vernon Hills Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury law with a key focus on motor vehicle accidents. Located in the heart of Illinois, our primary commitment is to support and advocate for victims of car accidents, ensuring they receive fair compensation for their damages. As leading personal injury lawyers in the region, we are aware that traffic collisions can result in serious bodily injuries or even loss of life.

Knowledge is indeed power when it comes to understanding auto accident laws and how they apply to your unique situation. In essence, Illinois operates under an ‘at-fault’ system whereby the individual who caused the accident shoulders responsibility for any losses sustained. This includes but isn’t limited to medical expenses, lost income due to inability to work, property damage as well as non-economic damages such as emotional trauma.

It’s important to underline these key subareas within motor vehicle injuries:

– Rear-end collisions: Frequently caused by sudden braking or tailgating.

– Head-on crashes: Often resulting from failure to maintain lane position or distracted driving.

– Side impact crashes: Also known as T-bone or angle collisions.

– Rollovers: Typically involve top-heavy vehicles operating at high speeds.

What if you didn’t cause the accident? Illinois adheres to comparative negligence rules which grant you the right to sue even if you partially contributed towards the accident. However, your degree of fault might reduce your potential settlement figure proportionately – another good reason why retaining competent legal representation like ours is crucial.

Through many years of operation within Illinoi’s complex legal framework, Carlson Bier has successfully assisted countless individuals recover settlements for various types of damages including; medical bills (past and future), loss of earning capacity, pain and suffering, mental anguish among other related losses that derive from auto accidents.

Understanding somber facts about car accidents prompts us all towards safer road usage practices while underscoring the indispensable role reliable legal protection occupies – once an unfortunate event does transpire. Given that the moments following a car accident can be tumultuous and disorienting, our attorneys are available 24/7 to provide requisite help.

Admittedly, filing an insurance claim correctly can be a time-consuming, overwhelming process especially with injuries or loss involved. Let us bear this burden for you. Not only do we facilitate seamless communication with your insurance company, but also relentlessly argue on your behalf to ensure fair compensation is paid out in a timely fashion.

On the subject of legal fees, concern not – every Carlson Bier consultation comes absolutely free of charge. Moreover, we operate on a contingency basis meaning our fee is derived from any eventual settlement money recovered – if no recovery ensues then you don’t owe us anything!

Remember – enlisting experienced personal injury lawyers infused with dedication and integrity like ourselves heightens your chances of acquiring the maximum settlement amount attainable under Illinois law. It’s crucial to mention that there are strict timelines known as statute of limitations within which auto accident claims should be lodged (typically two years from date of accident). Delay could lead to forfeiture of rightful compensation – so please don’t hesitate!

At Carlson Bier, we handle every case meticulously all while maintaining continuous open lines of communication ensuring clear comprehension of proceedings at each stage. Our proven track record epitomizes the loyalty clients have placed upon us helping them tide over what are quite often life-altering incidences.

In conclusion, if you’ve been injured in a car accident through no fault of your own or only hold partial blame – it’s more than just about healing physically and moving on; it’s about justice and monetary recompense fostering that restoration process both materially and emotionally too.

You deserve to know how much your case is worth! Hit the button below NOW allowing Carlson Bier’s highly respected personal injury team move swiftly analyzing your particular situation thereby providing invaluable guidance through complex local laws towards favorable restitution sum realization.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Vernon Hills Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

     

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Vernon Hills

Areas of Practice in Vernon Hills

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Fire Injuries

Offering expert legal assistance for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Extending dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Accountability

Managing cases involving faulty products, supplying expert legal services to customers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Abuse

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble and Fall Incidents

Skilled in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking recovery for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Offering legal support for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Collisions

Crashes: Committed to assisting sufferers of car accidents secure reasonable remuneration for hurts and harm.

Scooter Crashes

Focused on providing legal assistance for individuals involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Semi Accident

Providing expert legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for harms.

Construction Crashes

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Head Harms

Focused on offering dedicated legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and skilled legal support to ensure compensation.

Neural Trauma

Committed to representing clients with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer