FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Vernon Hills

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When victims of dog bite injuries in Vernon Hills seek extraordinary legal representation, Carlson Bier comes highly recommended. Specializing in personal injury claims including dog attacks, we fight for your rights with an exceptional dedication and skill unmatched by any other firm. Our distinguished reputation is backed by years of diligent practice and a strong commitment to our clients’ welfare, ensuring they are aptly compensated for their trauma. We understand the debilitating emotional stress associated with being victim to such an animal attack; hence at Carlson Bier we work tirelessly towards achieving justice—navigating through complex legal bureaucracy so you don’t have to. Embodying expertise and versatility, the attorneys at Carlson Bier adeptly dissect each case’s facts under Illinois law wherein multiple parties could be held liable for your suffering—from negligent owners to property managers who ignored leash laws. So if you’re battling consequences from a canine assault within Vernon Hills environs, trust no one but ourselves: The superior choice for comprehensive dog bite injury litigation across Illinois – making certain that aggrieved individuals get not just recompense, but closure too.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Vernon Hills Illinois

When managing an injury due to a dog bite, victims have legal rights that can be guided and protected by an accomplished team such as Carlson Bier Attorneys. Located in Illinois, we stand at the forefront when it comes to advocacy in personal injury cases, specifically those resulting from unexpected canine attacks. Possessing extensive experience in this domain, our law firm is dedicated to advising clients about their entitlements and avenues for seeking compensation under Illinois Law.

Dog bites can lead to severe physical harm including lacerations, fractures, nerve damage and infections like rabies. Beyond the physical implications lie psychological traumas including fear, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Furthermore, dealing with medical bills alongside recovery amplifies the situation’s stress levels exponentially. This complex mix of potential consequences highlights precisely why the professional counsel of skilled attorneys is crucial for dog bite victims.

The litigation process following a dog bite incident hinges on several key factors:

1.) Identifying who owns the responsible canine.

2.) Gathering evidence: This may involve medical records documenting your injuries; photographs at the scene; testimonies from eye-witnesses; or reports filed with animal control agencies or police.

3.) Establishing liability: Under Illinois statute 510ILCS 5/13 ‘Animal Control Act’, if you were conducting yourself peaceably without provoking the dog prior to attack, then its owner is strictly liable.

4.) Determining damages: Depending on severity of harm sustained along with out-of-pocket costs incurred in terms of medical bills, lost wages etc., our team will calculate potential settlement amounts.

At Carlson Bier Attorneys Group, we comprehend how daunting those steps might seem amidst dealing with traumatic aftermaths. However, entrusting us facilitates navigation through all these points proficiently. Our mission transcends merely securing fair monetary compensation for you – we aim also for reparation pertaining emotional suffering induced by unanticipated vicious encounters like these.

Expertise does not limit itself to the know-how of handling these cases, but extends into compassionate understanding of associated psychological trauma. Our team stands committed through each step along the complex recovery pathway. While you focus on setting your life back on track, we will stridently advocate for obligatory deserved compensation.

The state laws regarding dog bites may seem complicated and intimidating at first glance. However, they are deemed so in order to provide a structure leading towards justified recompense for victims like yourself. Acquainting with these minutiae paves way for solidifying your claim which is highly recommended under guidance from our adept law professionals.

Given nuances impacting each case – including breed of the offending canine; location & circumstances under which attack occurred; as well as specifics entailing medical treatment corresponding aftermaths – equips us aptly for devising fitting strategies towards achieving best possible outcomes tailored individually.

In essence, vetting resides within Carlson Bier’s foundational credo – we treat you like family exhibiting unrelenting dedication to facilitate retrieval of worthy closure following traumatic episodes owing to dog attacks. Learn how our unwavering commitment manifests from initial consultation right till claiming victory over rightful restitution in courts or settlements out-of-court with swift efficiency that keeps your convenience foremost always.

Should lingering questions or immediate concerns prompt urgent legal support need post encountering a dog bite incident here in Illinois, don’t hesitate any further. Delve deeper into exploration of our expert services by making use only one ‘click’ away! Seek clarity about intricacies regarding personal accident litigations focusing upon dog bites: Click on the button below. Initiate journey towards discovering possibilities encompassed within legalities pertaining your unique case today! Let amplified expertise hosted by Carlson Bier Attorneys Group illuminate worthiness of your case empowering surges within resilience thereby reclaiming control over rehabilitation course ensuring necessary safeguards protecting individual rights against potential transgressions persistently.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Vernon Hills Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Vernon Hills

Areas of Practice in Vernon Hills

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Scald Traumas

Giving adept legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Offering expert legal support for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Obligation

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, offering specialist legal services to victims affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Tumble Mishaps

Expert in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their suffering.

Newborn Traumas

Supplying legal assistance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Collisions

Crashes: Committed to assisting sufferers of car accidents receive appropriate recompense for wounds and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing legal support for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Truck Crash

Ensuring professional legal advice for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for damages.

Worksite Accidents

Committed to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Injuries

Expert in offering expert legal services for victims suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Adept at addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal representation to ensure restitution.

Neural Harm

Dedicated to supporting clients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440