FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Vernon Hills

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you or a loved one falls victim to a pedestrian accident in Vernon Hills, your best recourse is to engage the unparalleled services of Carlson Bier. Our group of attorneys specialize in personal injury cases, notably those involving pedestrian accidents. Boasting an unrivaled track record of securing favorable outcomes for our clients, we are committed to leveraging our extensive experience and knowledge base within this jurisprudence field. At Carlson Bier, we work meticulously on every case – investigating the circumstances surrounding each incident thoroughly so as to build strong defenses that resonate with judges and juries alike. In-depth understanding and comprehensive application of Illinois law serves as the essential pivot around which our legal strategies revolve; protecting client rights has always been at the core of our practice ethos! Strength does not lie solely in aggression but also empathy – something upon which we pride ourselves because it fuels us toward assisting victims retrieve their lives from such untoward incidents effectively! As advocates for pedestrians’ safety rights in accident-related events, don’t think twice about considering Carlson Bier’s qualified team when pursuing justice for your case.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Vernon Hills Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our foremost commitment lies in zealously advocating for victims who have been involved in pedestrian accidents on the busy streets of Illinois. As your confidant and ally, our team of proficient personal injury attorneys will strive relentlessly to pursue justice and ensure you are awarded the full compensation commensurate to your trauma.

Figures from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration evidence a steady influx in pedestrian fatalities over the years – frequently caused by distracted or negligent driving. It’s vital to recognise that being a pedestrian does not disqualify one from attaining safety on roadways. When such uncalled-for incidents befall you, it’s essential that you understand your entitlements under prevailing statutes and pursue legal action appropriately for the havoc caused.

Let’s delve into certain key aspects related to Pedestrian Accident law:

• Duty of Care: Both drivers and pedestrians share a mutual responsibility called ‘duty of care’ towards each other’s safety while navigating public thoroughfares.

• Breach of Duty: If an individual fails to oblige this duty leading to an accident, they can be held liable under negligence. Most pedestrian accidents are considered as negligence cases.

• Right-of-way-standard: Giving right-of-way is more often than not seen as yielding the way to avoid any impending harm between two parties sharing a common space.

• Comparative Negligence Rule: As per Illinois state law (735 ILCS 5/ (2-1116)), if both driver and victim are found partially accountable for an accident occurrence then their respective degree of guilt diminishes their claim amount proportionately.

Navigating such intricate parameters without proficient guidance could result in potential ramifications affecting just reparation claims negatively.

At Carlson Bier, we possess comprehensive knowledge about Illinois’ Personal Injury laws – offering an indispensable advantage when unraveling the build-up leading up to pedestrian accidents. Armed with extensive courtroom experience, tenacious negotiation skills, coupled with a client-centric approach, we are confident in delivering exhaustive legal counsel. We aim to shed light on the complex trajectory of pedestrian law lawsuits and also shield you from underhand practices that may affect your rightful compensation.

Pedestrian accident victims enduring physical injuries or psychological anguish due to another’s heedlessness can seek damages like medical costs, loss of income, pain and suffering. As per Illinois law (Tort immunity act), claims need to be filed within two years of t occurrence; missing this window could lead to dismissal from court consideration entirely hence it is critical for victims to take prompt action.

Predicting the outcome of a pedestrian accident lawsuit can be challenging because every case possesses its unique set of circumstances. However, success hinges greatly upon unraveling particulars involving the scene, necessary evidence, eyewitness accounts or driver admission. Gathering such intel becomes plausible with indefatigable legal counsel by your side investing their resources into your vested interests – an aspect Carlson Bier prides itself on.

Whether a hit-and-run incident or suffered at poorly maintained sidewalks contributing towards slip-and-fall accidents – our zealous advocacy shall represent you thoroughly ensuring maximum reparation value. Once you partner with us, be assured that Carlson Bier’s readiness to dispel uncertainty off your shoulders leaves room only for justice and restoration.

Our lawyers will tread over the challenges presented by stringent paperwork procedures while simultaneously constructing powerful defenses securing optimal results fervently fighting tooth and nail putting forth our best foot forward until the gavel finally drops favorably together standing tall never letting justice fall!

To discover how much your injury claim might amount to vis-à-vis fair remuneration accompanied by tranquil peace of mind – opt for an insightful consultation offered here at Carlson Bier today! With just one click below- get aboard with experience-backed stalwarts who saliently strive turning adversities around – ensure you see justice served accurately tapping into opportunities making them count prolifically raising standards persistently as your potent legal dynamo when you need it the most. Seize an opportunity to capitalize on thought leadership guiding you out of a tumultuous junction steadfastly at every step towards fresh beginnings ahead!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Vernon Hills Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Vernon Hills

Areas of Practice in Vernon Hills

Bicycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving adept legal services for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Negligence

Providing professional legal services for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, extending expert legal support to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Slip Occurrences

Professional in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Devoted to assisting patients of car accidents get just settlement for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Committed to providing legal advice for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Collision

Providing professional legal advice for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for injuries.

Building Site Mishaps

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cerebral Harms

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal services to ensure redress.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on supporting persons with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440