...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wenona

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a dog bite injury in Wenona can be distressing and life-altering. This is when the expert guidance of our dedicated legal team at Carlson Bier becomes indispensable. We stand as an authority built on decades-long professional experience, backed by numerous victories won for clients afflicted with similar circumstances. Our specialization in Dog Bite Injuries offers you access to nuanced evaluation procedures, cutting-edge evidence collection techniques, and robust litigation strategies ensuring favorable results. Empowered by our deep understanding of the provisions stipulated under Illinois law, we meticulously work towards securing your rightful compensation maintaining full confidentiality and integrity throughout the process. Here at Carlson Bier, emphasis is laid not just on legal victory but also on providing compassionate support that eases your ordeal enforcing rights against pet guardians appointed legally accountable for their pets’ actions leading to injuries hitherto inconceivable.The superior aptitude showcased by our lawyers warrants reassurance that together with us; advocates resolute in pursuing justice dutifully will manage your fight too! Reach out to thrust forward on this journey today with Carlson Bier – A name synonymous with proficiency in handling Dog Bite Injuries cases!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wenona Illinois

Dog bite injuries are a common occurrence causing severe physical harm and emotional distress. At Carlson Bier, we understand how traumatic such experiences can be and are committed to representing clients with utmost professionalism, handling the nuances of their case with due sensitivity. Our dedicated team comprises passionate personal injury attorneys specializing in dog bite incidents, driven by the mission to help victims secure deserved compensation.

It’s crucial to comprehend that Illinois law dictates a strict liability rule in instances of dog bites. In essence, this means that the owner or person responsible for the animal at the time of attack is held accountable for damages incurred, regardless if they were aware of their pet’s vicious propensity or not. The State emphasizes protecting its citizens from these forms of physical harm and awards suitable compensations based on assessment of damage inflicted.

• Extent of Injury: The severity and nature of your injuries contribute significantly towards establishing your rightful claim amount.

• Compensation Scope: Your compensation may cover expenses pertaining to medical treatment, wage loss during recovery period, future earnings lost due to long-term disability amongst others.

• Liability Aspect: Legal responsibility also plays an integral part in determining compensation amounts – typically leaning favorably for victims when dogs don’t have any known prior aggressive behavior.

In situations where numerous variables contribute towards shaping the outcome, our astute representation brings decisive advantages to you. Every scenario demands individual analysis where Carlson Bier excels – conducting thorough investigations enabling strategized moves aimed at securing maximum benefits for our clients. Be it evidencing your innocence during proceedings or exacting accountability upon guilty party– trust us to relentlessly fight for justice on all fronts as your representative companions.

As highlighted most notably in legal precedent Jones v. Lupu (1996), even mere attempts at escaping from an aggressive canine leading directly or indirectly to bodily harm puts defendant under state scrutiny , making them accountable under ‘Animal Control Act’ notwithstanding actual biting involved . These complexities reiterate why seeking skilled legal counsel is paramount when pursuing your claim.

Commitment and experience are vital qualities in a personal injury attorney, especially in complex cases like dog bite injuries. The Carlson Bier team is accredited with an enviable track record of large settlement winnings and countless accolades testifying our lawyers’ proficient handling of cases. This isn’t just about pursuing what’s lawfully yours – it’s also about ensuring your rightful peace of mind that you’ve entrusted your case into secure hands, accomplished at navigating this intricate legal terrain.

As headquartered Illinois citizens, we’re well-acquainted with local bureaucratic requirements and adapt quickly to the ever-evolving state law alterations aiding our persistent pursuit for justice on victim’s behalf. Our services may also extend beyond the courtroom– equipping clients with necessary resources such as medical professional referrals or prognosis experts if required – indicative of our holistic client-centric approach.

Our free case evaluation stands testament to our straightforward manner, commitment towards transparency and client empowerment. We understand how crucial it is for you to feel assured about your decision- which is why we invite you to retrieve an initial estimate on potential recoveries through this no-obligation review.

Injuries due to dog bites can have lasting repercussions drastically altering one’s life course. At Carlson Bier, we reiterate – You don’t need to face these challenges alone. Allow us help restore equilibrium disrupted by this unfortunate incident assisting through every step from consulting medical professionals or dealing intricacies of damage claims maximizing your deserved compensation.

Click on the button below now; let us assist your restoration journey by furnishing realistic estimations indicating potentially viable directions aligning better implications for tomorrow remembering it’s not just about recovery but also reclaiming control over circumstances once perturbed but now firmly set on path defined by justice and fair play.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wenona Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wenona

Areas of Practice in Wenona

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Scald Wounds

Providing specialist legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Misconduct

Offering expert legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving defective products, supplying adept legal assistance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Abuse

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Tumble Incidents

Adept in managing trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking redress for their damages.

Childbirth Harms

Extending legal aid for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Dedicated to guiding clients of car accidents get appropriate compensation for damages and damages.

Motorcycle Accidents

Expert in providing representation for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Crash

Providing expert legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Building Site Mishaps

Focused on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Neurological Traumas

Committed to delivering compassionate legal representation for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Harms

Skilled in managing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and adept legal representation to ensure fairness.

Backbone Trauma

Expert in assisting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​