FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Wenona

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate circumstance of a pedestrian accident occurring in Wenona, it could be essential to engage with Carlson Bier. As proficient attorneys specializing in personal injury cases, they boast an impressive track record for achieving maximum settlements and verdicts on behalf of those affected by pedestrian mishaps. With their deep insights into Illinois law and thorough understanding regarding the complexities involved in such type of litigation process, they are well-equipped to ensure your rights are staunchly defended.

There’s no denying how drastically such accidents can impact one’s life both physically and emotionally. Nonetheless, Carlson Bier is ever ready to navigate these challenging legal waters on clients’ behalf ensuring optimal compensation benefits are attained.

Confidently championing justice through comprehensive courtroom representation or thoughtful negotiation deals – this highly diligent firm proves itself as an ideal choice when seeking expert guidance following a pedestrian accident within Wenona city limits. Trusting Carlson Bier implies leveraging years-long expertise manifested through dedicated service and unwavering commitment towards each client’s best interest- reasons enough why this esteemed law entity deserves one’s steadfast consideration.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Wenona Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the devastating impact pedestrian accidents can have on victims and their families. With an unwavering commitment to representing personal injury victims in Illinois, we specialize in providing you with meticulous legal representation that holds accountable those responsible for pedestrian accidents.

A pedestrian accident generally refers to a situation where a vehicle hits a person on foot – while they are walking, running, or jogging. A considerably common occurrence, these mishaps result from various factors such as driver negligence, poor visibility, speeding and intoxication among others; leading to an alarming increase in injuries and even fatalities each year across Illinois.

Among the key points to note:

• Pedestrian right of way: In many circumstances, pedestrians have the unambiguous right of way. The violation of this rule by motorists often results in horrific consequences.

• Proving fault: Determining who’s at fault is central to your case. Often it requires proving negligence—that means demonstrating that the motorist failed to practice reasonable care.

• Multiple defendants: There could potentially be more than one defendant in your case—which implicates multiple insurance companies.

Understanding how these aspects toy into your case cannot only steer your claims’ direction but also influence its outcome.

Pedestrians victimized by such accidents may suffer profound physical injuries – such as broken bones, spinal cord damage or brain trauma – that not only require immediate medical attention but long-term rehabilitation too. Moreover, emotional harm like PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) could affect their quality of life substantially being equally debilitating as any physical wound sustained during the accident. These troubling aftereffects show why achieving justice through full-fledged financial compensation becomes crucial.

Consequently involving legal expertise entails two objectives:

1) Establishing liability – It proves who is responsible for the accident

2) Quantifying damages–your lawyer will help calculate fair and rightful compensation based on examination costs, physiotherapy bills and other future expenses linked to ongoing care or lost wages.

We at Carlson Bier, armed with years of experience and sharp legal acumen, strive to accomplish these objectives designed to ensure maximum compensation for your loss and suffering. We meticulously explore every angle of your case, from thorough investigation preventing any detail – however minute it may be – to fall through the cracks. Our approach is to take over the complex legal aspects so that you can concentrate on recovery.

Victims need a supportive ally who empathizes with their situation but also tirelessly advocates for them in courtrooms or negotiation tables. Providing that distinctly competent yet compassionate service lies at the core of what we offer at Carlson Bier.

Remember, under Illinois law pedestrian accident victims have exclusive rights that deserve protection—and asserting those rights commences with choosing a proficient attorney who will fight tooth and nail by your side until justice prevails.

Don’t let an unfortunate event like a pedestrian accident deprive you of what’s rightfully yours – fair recompense for pain, suffering, lost wages & more; as per Illinois laws! Click on the button below now to evaluate how much YOUR CASE IS WORTH! It’s time for action; let us navigate this arduous journey for you—because at Carlson Bier, WE PUT YOU FIRST.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wenona Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Wenona

Areas of Practice in Wenona

Bicycle Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering adept legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Medical Malpractice

Delivering expert legal advice for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, extending adept legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Slip Injuries

Specialist in managing trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their injuries.

Childbirth Wounds

Providing legal support for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Crashes

Incidents: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents get appropriate compensation for harms and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Mishap

Offering adept legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Committed to defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or recklessness.

Head Damages

Specializing in offering professional legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Expertise in dealing with cases for people who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and professional legal support to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Focused on defending patients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​