Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Wenona

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

For those facing the complexities of a spinal cord injury in Wenona, Carlson Bier offers unparalleled legal representation. Our distinguished attorneys specialize in spinal cord injuries and will fight for your rights every step of the way to ensure justice is served. We understand that victims are often burdened by medical bills, pain or loss of income parallel to their physical suffering – an overwhelming prospect we aim to alleviate with our dedication and expertise. Not all personal injury law firms have extensive experience in this intricate field, but at Carlson Bier, it’s one of our core specialties. We pride ourselves on detailed case preparation and aggressive advocacy for deserving clients dealing with these life-altering cases. Demonstrated through countless victories in courtrooms across Illinois, our mastery has won us numerous product liability lawsuits against negligent parties causing avoidable harm due to their carelessness or oversight—a testament to why many choose Carlson Bier when searching for proficient Spinal Cord Injuries attorneys.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Wenona Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the complexities and life-altering experiences associated with spinal cord injuries. As your devoted personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we are committed to providing you with comprehensive legal counsel on matters pertaining to such severe traumas. Our professional expertise lies in assuaging the distress and uncertainty victims may face, guiding them through every step of the legal process.

Spinal cord injuries create significant physical and emotional burdens. Primarily they result from a sudden blow or cut to the spine causing damage to any part of the spinal cord or nerves at the end of the spinal canal. This usually manifests as pain, reduced sensation, muscle weakness, or total paralysis; sometimes these symptoms can lead up to other secondary conditions like respiratory issues or bladder control problems.

Crucial elements that need consideration following a spinal cord injury include:

– The Severity: Spinal cord injuries range from mild contusions (bruising of the spinal cord) to complete transaction where there is no sensory or motor function below the level of injury.

– Location of Injury: Depending on which segment of your spine injured – cervical (neck), thoracic (chest), lumbar (lower back), sacral (hip) area – symptoms and recovery vary.

– Recovery & Rehabilitation Process: While advancements have been made in treatment options – including physical therapy, surgery, medications – recovery timelines differ drastically for each individual.

Patients suffering from these injuries inevitably incur enormous medical costs for treatments such as surgeries, rehabilitation therapies which make it imperative that their rights are thoroughly protected when pursuing compensation claims in court. Meanwhile navigating insurance analogies and resisting unjust settlement offers becomes a hassle during this already challenging time.

This is where Carlson Bier comes into play! With plentiful years dedicated toward serving patients grappling around similar circumstances within Illinois state lines, our team brings aboard extensive knowledge around local laws concerning personal injury cases involving spinal cord complications.

We meticulously sift through medical reports empowering us to effectively communicate the extent of your suffering to insurance companies and courts, affirming your entitlements are not dismissed. In conjunction with detailed evidence and expert testimonies that we gather, we support you in court to ensure a rightful settlement that sufficiently covers medical expenses, income losses and acknowledges your pain & suffering.

Our primary objective at Carlson Bier is not merely providing legal representation; instead, it encompasses empowering victims to regain control over their lives post such traumatic experiences. And for this reason, we dedicate ourselves completely towards your case – right from investigating the cause of injury to representing you during trial or resolving matters outside courtroom all while keeping you informed about every progress made on your claim.

Time is often a critical factor in these cases as injuries should be reported immediately followed by legal intervention. Hence it’s vital to act swiftly by consulting an experienced personal injury attorney following any serious spinal cord incident which ensures that victims can focus entirely on their recovery whilst rest assured their legal needs are systematically tended.

Remember though our offices aren’t located in Wenona city limits but centralized conveniently within Illinois state boundaries; Carlson Bier remains committed towards serving clients Warriors wide across various counties through our seamless online consultation mechanisms along with robust customer service available round-the-clock answering any queries about potential claims.

The importance of choosing the right attorney after experiencing a devastating injury cannot be overstated. At Carlson Bier, we stand ready to help you navigate the complex landscape of personal injury law ensuring justice served reflecting adequate compensation warranted against negligent parties involved in causing these horrendous incidents.

We invite you now to take the first step forward toward reclaiming stability back into life post spine trauma. Uncertain about how much could get compensated potentially for suffered loss? Click on the button below calculate instantly! Don’t let worries hold back from initiating this stepping-stone towards recovery – Get Started today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Wenona Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Wenona

Areas of Practice in Wenona

Bicycle Mishaps

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Fire Injuries

Providing skilled legal assistance for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Offering experienced legal services for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Taking on cases involving faulty products, providing expert legal support to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall & Tumble Mishaps

Skilled in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their damages.

Infant Wounds

Providing legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to assisting victims of car accidents get equitable recompense for hurts and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal advice for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Trucking Incident

Extending adept legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Damages

Dedicated to ensuring specialized legal support for clients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for people who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Focused on legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Undeserved Loss

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and expert legal support to ensure fairness.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Dedicated to representing persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer