...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in West Garfield Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re faced with the harsh realities of medical malpractice, Carlson Bier is the trusted name in pursuit of justice. Specializing in Medical Malpractice law across Illinois, we have a proven track record upholding patients’ rights against negligence and careless actions within healthcare settings. We prioritize your wellbeing by relentlessly pursuing accountability for medical professionals whose actions result in injury or suffering. Our seasoned team not only understands Illinois’s intricacies concerning these laws but has utilized this expertise to help countless citizens get rightful compensation. And while West Garfield Park residents can benefit from our services, keep in mind that neither state boundaries nor city lines alter our unwavering commitment to coach you through this maze termed ‘Legal Reparation’. Remember – when health caregivers fail their duty of care, turning towards experience spells relief: then your first call should be Carlson Bier- true champions at the helm fighting for patient safety and advocating responsibility within medicine’s sacred halls. Choose Carlson Beir – where we make your fight ours!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in West Garfield Park Illinois

At the distinguished law firm of Carlson Bier, we are deeply committed to advocating for victims of medical malpractice in Illinois. As personal injury attorneys with vast experience and comprehensive knowledge, we understand how devastating it can be when medical professionals fail to provide the standard of care you rightfully deserve.

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider – such as a doctor, nurse, or technician – performs an action or fails to perform an action that directly results in harm to a patient. It’s important to note that not every unfavorable outcome amounts to malpractice; human error and unforeseen complications occur even under optimal conditions. However, if negligence is involved, you could have grounds for a case against your healthcare provider.

Your health should never be compromised by negligence nor incompetence. If such wrongdoing exists among medical professionals responsible for your well-being, this is where our proficient legal team steps in. Your rights will serve as our motivation to passionately pursuit justice on your behalf.

Key elements of a medical malpractice claim typically include:

• Proof that a doctor-patient relationship existed: We’ll need demonstrable evidence showing you had entered into an agreement with your healthcare provider which created their obligation towards offering you professional medical care.

• Evidence of negligence: It’s necessary to illustrate that the hospital or practitioner acted below the established standard of care expected within the profession.

• Link between negligence and harm: Carlson Bier ensures proof is gathered verifying that it was indeed because of this negligence that damage occurred.

• Clear demonstration of damages: Owing to negligent conduct from your healthcare provider detailing physical pain, emotional suffering, additional medical expenses incurred both present and future must be distinctly established.

Navigating the complexities bound up with these key issues requires profound understanding and detailed know-how reserved only for seasoned practitioners. And this serves as one compelling reason why partnering with Carlson Bier on your quest for rightful compensation benefits immensely.

Our thorough approach begins right at intake; reviewing all relevant facts, circumstances and medical records, even consulting with top-notch medical experts. This meticulous workup allows us to build a robust case in advocating for the compensation you deserve.

As esteemed Illinois personal attorneys at Carlson Bier, we consider every minute detail that may affect your claim’s outcome – from carefully documenting all necessary evidence to anticipating defense strategies. This level of exhaustive preparation places our representation above par and distinctly positions us to relentlessly pursue on your behalf.

Seeking recourse for damages sustained through Medical Malpractice can be a daunting process fraught with medical jargon, time constraints, impossible documentation requests and even liability issues further complicating matters. We assure you Carlson Bier is here rooting not just legally but emotionally right by your side. Working tirelessly for justice lives at the core of what we do because we believe when one community member suffers due to negligence; the community in its entirety suffers too.

The value of your case is dependent upon several factors each having its unique influence and weight ranging from severity of the injury suffered, expenditure related to past/future medical bills incurred or expected loss of earnings among others. These are complex considerations that require expert legal interpretation available only at proficient firms like ours such as Carlson Bier—the go-to option settling for nothing less than excellence in representing victims Oliver Medial Malpractice effectively obtaining settlements they rightfully deserve.

To explore more about how we could contribute towards getting you fair recompense for negligent maltreatment endured including access our free online case evaluation tool immediately connecting you with an expert attorney whose adept understanding will guide suitably around next steps—click on the button below.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For West Garfield Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in West Garfield Park

Areas of Practice in West Garfield Park

Bicycle Crashes

Focused on legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Offering expert legal support for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Carelessness

Offering professional legal representation for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Addressing cases involving problematic products, supplying adept legal help to victims affected by defective items.

Elder Mistreatment

Representing the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Slip Occurrences

Adept in dealing with tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking compensation for their losses.

Neonatal Harms

Supplying legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Focused on supporting individuals of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for hurts and harm.

Motorbike Crashes

Committed to providing legal assistance for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Truck Crash

Offering experienced legal support for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cognitive Injuries

Committed to providing compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Traumas

Skilled in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Harm

Committed to supporting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​