...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in West Garfield Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffering from a spinal cord injury can be an incredibly traumatic experience, both emotionally and physically. In these challenging times, Carlson Bier dedicates its expertise to provide the legal assistance needed for those affected in West Garfield Park. As knowledgeable personal injury attorneys specializing in spinal cord injuries cases, we comprehend the complexities that surround this area of law and understand your unique needs following such serious incidents. We take pride in our reputation for securing substantial compensation for medical expenses or loss of earnings due to incapacitation from a spinal cord injury. Our team is reminiscent with West Garfield Park’s local nuances that bring valuable insight towards your case’s trajectory whilst honoring Illinois state law on attorney advertising practices at all times.

Consider choosing Carlson Bier – champions not only renowned for their legal acumen but deeply committed professionals striving relentlessly to uphold your rights and make every effort towards achieving rightful recompense promised by justice when life deals harshly with you through unexpected events such as debilitating spinal cord injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in West Garfield Park Illinois

At the Carlson Bier law firm, we understand that spinal cord injuries can radically alter your life and its quality. Our compassionate personal injury attorneys have years of experience dealing with such serious cases here in Illinois. A spinal cord injury not only endangers physical well-being but impacts emotional health, earning potential, and overall quality of life – aspects often overlooked in ill-prepared legal battles.

As you read further, you’ll find crucial information about spinal cord injuries and important steps one should consider when confronted with such a devastating event. To start with, let’s delve into understanding what these types of injuries are all about; Spinal Cord Injuries refer to damage impacting the tracts or nerves within the spinal cord that relay signals from our brain to different parts of our body. This largely disrupts motor functions potentially causing numbing pain, loss of sensation or even paralysis.

• Complete Injuries: Resulting in total loss of sensory functionalities below the level of injury.

• Incomplete Injuries: Allowing some degree of functionality beneath the site of damage.

Uncovering causes behind spinal injuries offers another layer to this alarming health problem. Spinal Cord Injuries primarily occur due to traumatic impact fueled by traffic accidents, falls or violence incidents amongst other unforeseen events.

Decoding consequences must be a part and parcel of any effort designed to tackle this complex issue. Effects predominantly vary based on two factors- location point and severity coupled with type (whether it is complete or incomplete):

• Upper Neck Area: Can potentially impact nearly every functional aspect ranging from breathing dynamics to swallowing food.

• Mid-Torso Region: Dependent on extent; effects range between paraplegia i.e., loss pertaining mainly to leg control up until minor disturbances entailing bowl coordination.

Clearly navigating through medical complexities demands high levels legal expertise uniquely dedicated towards seeking compensations proportional to adversities encountered as opposed to a blanket approach employed by others falling short in their comprehension of these cataclysmic personal tragedies.

At Carlson Bier, we apply our deep understanding of specific intricacies associated with Spinal Cord Injuries in devising an individualized strategy integral to your fighting chances at securing rightful compensation. We’re here to guide you through a successful claim journey which requires demonstrating:

• The occurrence was due to another party’s negligence.

• The medical consequences being directly linked with the incident caused by negligent behavior.

Aligning these legal requirements with your unique scenario is a daunting task but one that we skillfully navigate while holding close relationships with reputable doctors and healthcare experts, thus building strong cases grounded on accurate health evaluations.

Our representation aims to secure compensation for various burdens imposed on victims including medical bills (immediate and future), lost wages or handling home modifications designed for accessibility needs. It’s also possible to get reimbursement for emotional suffering and any persistent disabilities arising from such life-altering injuries.

Allow us at Carlson Bier law firm to shoulder your troubles as we relentlessly fight against injustice hand-in-hand empowering you along this process – uninterrupted by regional boundaries- true to our commitment as devoted personal Injury attorneys serving throughout Illinois (though please be aware, contrary to misleading advertising practices out there, it is illegal in Illinois to market that services are available based out of locations where there isn’t a physical office.)

You’ve found yourself in trying times dealing with grievous pain inflicted upon you due unwarranted negligence. You don’t have to face this ordeal alone – here in Illinois; you always have the trustful aid of attorneys at Carlson Bier who understand well, sympathise sincerely, act quickly and commit frankly towards your quest for justice after debilitating Spinal Cord Injuries.& nbsp;

Help us help you ensure a flawless claims process – push the button below and let’s explore how much your case could be worth together!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For West Garfield Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in West Garfield Park

Areas of Practice in West Garfield Park

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or perilous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Giving professional legal help for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Medical Misconduct

Ensuring experienced legal representation for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Responsibility

Taking on cases involving problematic products, delivering specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Slip Accidents

Expert in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking restitution for their damages.

Newborn Damages

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Mishaps: Dedicated to helping clients of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Expert in providing representation for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Big Rig Collision

Delivering adept legal support for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recompense for losses.

Building Site Collisions

Focused on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Cognitive Injuries

Specializing in offering dedicated legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Proficient in handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unfair Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and adept legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Expert in representing clients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​