...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Wyoming

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the intricacies of dog bite injuries, an experienced legal advocate is essential to safeguard your rights. In such circumstances, Carlson Bier serves as a steadfast ally. Based in Illinois, our team provides representation for individuals who have been victimized by such incidents across various jurisdictions. Trustworthy and proficient, our firm boasts a track record marked by successful verdicts and settlements in hound-related harm cases. Our skilled attorneys are particularly well-versed in managing the complexities these situations engender; providing comfort amongst crisis through comprehensive legal aid that caters specifically to victims of canine-caused damages.

Expertise from Carlson Bier extends beyond court preparation and representation: we also guide clients on legislation applicable to their case – offering advice about possible remedies available under Wyoming law without insinuating any affiliation or physical presence thereon implied.

Choose Carlton Bier as your go-to authority for navigating the challenging landscapes of dog injury lawsuits – ensuring justice is not merely sought after but tenaciously achieved too.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Wyoming Illinois

Dog bite injuries are a common yet subtle trauma that often leaves victims with physical and emotional scars. In the state of Illinois, responsibility for these damages rests on the dog owners themselves. The law firm Carlson Bier possesses extensive expertise in tackling such personal injury cases, ensuring that you or your loved one is adequately compensated for any pain, disarray or inconveniences caused by a dog bite incident.

Firstly, our competent team of lawyers will seek to understand every nuance of your scenario; every menacing growl before the attack, every plea made to intervene and save you from harm’s way – all contribute to constructing your case accurately. Our first aim would be to investigate attentively using all pieces of evidence available at hand.

• Dog attack reports: Collecting information from eyewitnesses as well as official records like police or animal control reports will help substantiate your case.

• Medical record history: Immediate attention post-attack can result in medical records that detail out the nature and extent of injuries sustained.

• Contextual details: Circumstances leading up to an event play a crucial role in determining liability. For instance, if you entered private property without permission when the dog attacked vis-a-vis being bitten at a public place changes who holds responsibility.

After conducting an in-depth study of your situation, we would then lay down possible routes towards claiming compensation. It is essential to note that under Illinois law, if a dog’s owner argues that they had no prior knowledge about their pet’s vicious proclivities before the attack occurred — this argument holds little water. This stance transforms into another point favoring victims governed under strict liability rules exclusive only to them residing within this state boundary.

The Carlson Bier lawyer team remains conversant with both generalible defenses members opposing parties put forth and effective tactics suited ideally for counteracting said maneuvers setting victim rights paramount always –

• Questionable behavior: If debunked claims about provoking the dog into attacking are made, they will be appropriately contested.

• Leash laws: Illinois enforces stringent leash laws over designated zones to confirm and streamline the liability aspect better off any given dog bite case.

Our mission involves not just securing your deserved compensation but also guiding you through the subsequent steps post-win or settlement. These steps may include negotiating with insurance companies, overseeing liens, or correcting underpaid damages vis-a-vis monetary restitution commensurate asper victim suffering severity. Fight at hand isn’t merely winning – it’s about ensuring justice gets served holistically.

Factoring medical expenses, loss of earnings due to recuperation time, and psychological distress – your entitlement is calculated alike negligence claims rather than exclusively for veterinary costs – bringing magnified focus on victim trauma over an animal’s reactionary circumstance henceforth. The Carlson Bier team ensures all these elements get fed into your claim evidence pool — we leave no stone unturned when advocating for you.

In Illinois county groups like ours have been set up to provide you with both advice and representation amidst trying times inflicted predominantly via dog-bite causations leaving mental images hard to repress yet imperative in formulating lawsuit bases soundly against guilty parties singular each time. Our knowledgeable lawyers can welcome conversations that start from anxiety end at reassurance studded throughout adequate information transferal sessions regarding legal affairs prompted by unfortunate instances such.

Is a variegated contingency fee something per se doesn’t translate equitable recourse? Will witness testimonies pack enough punch safeguarding yourself legally immediately after an unexpected attack ensuing swift aftermath recovery spiritually?

Deep dive along us unravel answers efficient next step mapping endeavors simultaneously – unsurpassed legal care journey embarking pursued equivalent getting linked directly towards achieving desired righteous output agenda outcomes devoid hassle totality intact eventually — click on the button below today ascertain how much precisely relatable personal injury claim potentially vaults towards! Get optimum legal advice, service quality showered endlessly onto Carlson Bier – the law outfit Illinois inhabitants can bank upon wholly!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Wyoming Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Wyoming

Areas of Practice in Wyoming

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Providing adept legal support for patients of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Healthcare Carelessness

Offering expert legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing adept legal services to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Stumble Occurrences

Skilled in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking compensation for their damages.

Childbirth Traumas

Extending legal aid for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting clients of car accidents gain reasonable remuneration for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Incidents

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

18-Wheeler Incident

Providing professional legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Concentrated on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Injuries

Dedicated to ensuring specialized legal services for clients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog bites or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Fighting for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and expert legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Trauma

Expert in defending individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer