...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Yates City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one has suffered from the unfortunate incident of a dog bite in Yates City, your search for unparalleled legal assistance ends with Carlson Bier. With an exceptional track record in handling dog-bite injury cases, our skilled attorneys stand adamantly focused on helping clients pursue justice and fair compensation. Using expert knowledge of Illinois law – we have successfully secured optimum results for those inflicted by canine-induced harm, helping them cover medical bills and emotional distress caused. What sets us apart is not just our wins – it’s also the empathy we show to each client devastated by such traumatic occurrences; it’s about making the journey towards recovery less daunting. We guide you through every step of your claim process with care, commitment and unmatched professionalism while meeting strict legal standards set by Illinois jurisdiction. By choosing Carlson Bier as your trusted ally, you are prioritizing seasoned expertise that comprehends intricacies specific to dog bite injuries- because at the end of it all- justice matters!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Yates City Illinois

Discovering Carlson Bier, respected personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, brings you a powerful ally in navigating the complexities of dog bite injuries. With experience and expertise blended seamlessly into their practice ethos, they have your best interests at heart.

Dog bites can often lead to severe physical and emotional trauma. It’s important to remember that as per Illinois state law, the owner of the dog is held strictly liable for damages caused by an unprovoked attack. This means you need not prove negligence on part of the owner to claim compensation.

Different aspects underline each dog bite case such as:

– Nature and extent of injuries: Dog bites can cause varying degrees of damage including puncture wounds, fractures, nerve damage or infections like Rabies.

– Psychological impact: The victim might suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety or fear after such an incident.

– Medical costs: Ongoing treatments may include surgical procedures and psychiatric care.

– Loss wages during recovery: Prolonged medical treatment may result in significant loss of income and earning capacity.

Carlson Bier’s legal team diligently understands these variables in order to build a comprehensive case for you. They assess overarching medical expenses including future cost implications associated with psychological distress counseling or reconstructive surgery that could potentially arise from dog bite injuries.

Understanding the rights of a dog bite injury victim propels us at Carlson Bier towards tirelessly championing client-centric justice. We assist our clients every step along this challenging journey; right from filing insurance claims to litigating trial suits if necessary. Providing detailed explanations about expected compensations considering Illinois laws elevates your understanding about potential outcomes making it easier for us together as we fight for what is fair.

A notable aspect where our involvement makes substantial improvement is managing interaction with insurance companies seeking claim settlements being fully aware that initial offerings are generally low-balled. Leveraging past case successes helps negotiate better terms favoring our clients’ best interests and ensuring rightful compensation is awarded.

Moreover, it’s important to know that there is no strict timeline for filing a dog bite lawsuit in Illinois. However, under the state’s statute of limitations rule you generally get two years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit seeking damages. The legal team at Carlson Bier works meticulously towards ensuring actions are taken within this specified time frame avoiding any potential exemptions.

Living with residual effects of a dog bite can be challenging but having an empathetic support system that understands your struggle provides much-needed solace during such times. At Carlson Bier we strive to build enduring relationships based on mutual trust and respect helping our clients navigate through uncertain terrains while keeping them updated about proceedings every step along the way.

In realizing how traumatic recovery post-dog-bite injuries can be, empathy forms an integral part of our professional endeavors where we work relentlessly towards safeguarding your interests bringing justice home. Valuing each client uniquely greatly influences our approach where serving you best supersedes all else morphing us into more than just personal injury lawyers by becoming partners in your pursuit of justice.

The vast canvas defining Carlson Bier’s service spectrum clearly portrays dedicated efforts solely syncopated for achieving transparency, fairness and empowerment for all its clients providing unparalleled assistance throughout their quest for resolving dog bite cases effectively.

We hope this page has been informative and useful in understanding crucial aspects involved within legal perspectives surrounding dog bite injury cases in Illinois. By partnering with experienced professionals like us at Carlson Bier, not only do you stand strong legally but gain compassionate support easing this tumultuous journey significantly while also promising desirable outcomes promptly

Do you want to find out what your case could potentially be valued at? Don’t hesitate – click on the button below and take one definitive step towards claiming what is rightfully yours today! You may never know – fairness might just lie around that unexplored corner ready to greet you with open arms if trusted allies like us have your back!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Yates City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Yates City

Areas of Practice in Yates City

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Expert in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing expert legal help for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Medical Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal advice for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Taking on cases involving faulty products, offering specialist legal assistance to consumers affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Slip Accidents

Adept in managing trip accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking justice for their losses.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal support for families affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Devoted to aiding clients of car accidents receive equitable compensation for hurts and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Specializing in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Truck Accident

Ensuring expert legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Construction Incidents

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Injuries

Specializing in delivering expert legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Skilled in managing cases for people who have suffered damages from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Committed to advocating for clients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​