...

Bicycle Accidents in Crescent City

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a bicycle accident, your choice of legal representation can profoundly influence the outcome. Entrust your case to Carlson Bier; an esteemed personal injury law firm highly reputed in handling bicycle accidents intricately. Our seasoned attorneys’ skills and expertise extend effortlessly across Illinois, including Crescent City’s vicinity. We are committed to safeguarding cyclists’ rights and ensuring justice is served swiftly and efficiently. Utilizing our extensive knowledge of local traffic laws, we zealously fight for maximum compensation while you focus on recovery. With abundant experience in negotiating with insurance companies, Carlson Bier excels at securing optimal settlements that mirror attendant medical costs, pain suffering, lost wages–and most importantly: peace of mind for victims bikers who have encountered such misfortune while navigating Crescent City’s roads or trails—advocating tirelessly until justice is achieved—a hallmark that sets us apart from other firms—choose Carlson Bier as your defender against injustice arising from negligent road users causing harmful bicycle accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Crescent City Illinois

At the esteemed Carlson Bier law firm, we firmly believe in protecting the rights of our clients and taking a stand against those liable for their personal injuries. As specialists based in Illinois, an area with bustling urban spaces and scenic countryside trails, our expertise extend to cases involving bicycle accidents.

Bicycling offers numerous benefits such as improved health, lessened environmental impact, and reduced commuting costs. However, it also poses certain dangers particularly when riders share the road with motorized vehicles. According to data from the National Safety Council (NSC), thousands of cyclists are killed or severely injured yearly on U.S. roads through no fault of their own but due to driver negligence or unsafe infrastructure.

Bicycle accident victims may suffer head trauma such as concussions or traumatic brain injury; broken bones; spinal cord damages; lacerations and bruises; emotional distress and more – these are injuries that can dramatically affect one’s quality of life. Becoming a victim is not only physically debilitating but also emotionally draining and financially devastating considering medical bills, rehabilitation expenses, lost income during recovery period among others.

In instances like these where you have been wronged despite observing all safety regulations on your end as a cyclist – wearing helmets and reflective gear for visibility at night, abiding by traffic rules – you clearly deserve reparation:

• From negligent parties who caused the accident due to reckless driving practices like speeding or distracted driving

• From local authorities having failed to maintain safe cycling routes free from potholes or other hazardous conditions

• From manufacturing companies whose faulty bicycle parts contributed to your accident

Carlson Bier holds each responsible party accountable in order to secure maximum compensation tailored to your specific situation so you can focus on recuperating while we handle insurance firms and legal work.

Experience has taught us that evidence is key when building strong cases: capturing photos of the incident site; preserving damaged bicycles for examination; acquiring eyewitness testimonies right away before memory fades; obtaining surveillance footage if available – could all make significant differences in painting a vivid picture of how events unfolded leading up to the accident.

Consulting medical professionals is another crucial step. Your diagnosis and treatment plan will illustrate the extent of physical damage suffered, putting into perspective your pain and suffering which can be factored in during compensation calculations aside from any tangible losses like healthcare costs or potential lost earnings.

Our stalwart attorneys examine every detail with meticulous care, from reviewing official reports to closely collaborating with medical experts for a comprehensive understanding of client conditions and life-altering consequences coming from someone else’s negligence.

We understand that dealing with such unfortunate events can feel overwhelming which calls more than ever for competent legal representation prioritizing you every step of the way. At Carlson Bier, we offer compassionate yet aggressive advocacy to ensure your rightful interests are vehemently pursued within the demanding realm of personal injury law.

May you find yourself suddenly tossed into this bitter circumstance: navigating through an arduous recovery following a bicycle accident while simultaneously confronting confusing legal procedures designed to obtain fairness and justice – pause for a moment & allow us, certified specialists dedicated entirely on personal injury cases, be your reliable ally throughout this trying ordeal.

You might still question “How much exactly is my case worth?” Various elements come into play when determining financial compensation but rest assured each one will be thoroughly explored by our proficient lawyers driven not just by duty but genuine empathy towards individuals unfairly burdened by unexpected adversities.

Curiosity piqued about potential monetary restitution due your circumstances? Let’s take one vital step forward towards reclaiming peace amidst chaos together – click on the button below for an expert evaluation outlining what you may rightfully deserve given evidence at hand installed against liable parties situated miles away from Crescent City where no physical offices for Carlson Bier exists.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Crescent City Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Crescent City

Areas of Practice in Crescent City

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving specialist legal help for people of major burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal support for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Accountability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, supplying adept legal services to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Abuse

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Fall Mishaps

Skilled in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking redress for their harm.

Childbirth Wounds

Delivering legal guidance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Mishaps: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents secure fair payout for damages and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Big Rig Collision

Delivering experienced legal services for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to offering professional legal services for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Focused on legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Passing

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering empathetic and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to representing patients with spine impairments, offering professional legal support to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer