...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in North Pekin

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating through the aftermath of dog bite injuries can be a complex process, hence creating an essential need for accomplished advocates like Carlson Bier. As seasoned professionals, our law firm encompasses skilled personal injury attorneys strictly dedicated to securing justice and adequate compensation for victims of such traumatic incidents within North Pekin. A paramount part of our services involves meticulously decoding Illinois’s nuanced legal framework pertaining to dog bites, ensuring your rights are upheld while alleviating burdensome complications from the litigation process. Our approach is anchored in comprehensive research and robust advocacy; we work tirelessly analyzing medical reports, eyewitness accounts, vet records among other critical data streams that empower us in constructing rock-solid arguments suited to individual client’s circumstances optimally. Carlson Bier stands as a paragon choice among those seeking strategic advocacy and compassionate support amidst their dog bite predicament – we go beyond just representing you legally; we relentlessly fight for your due restitution with utmost dignity.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in North Pekin Illinois

Welcome to the website of Carlson Bier, your stalwart personal injury legal advocates based in Illinois. One specific area we specialize in is handling personal injury claims stemming from Dog Bite Injuries. We understand that experiencing a dog bite can lead to severe physical damage and emotional trauma. Navigating through the aftermath shouldn’t be a solo journey – allow our experienced attorneys at Carlson Bier to guide you toward justice.

Dog Bite Injuries are unfortunately common, but it’s crucial to understand that victims possess rights under Illinois law which empower them towards recuperation or compensation for their damages. These rights protect both adults and children bitten by dogs regardless of breed or size; creating an environment where safety comes first.

A few significant aspects concerning Dog Bite Injuries include:

– The onus often lies on the dog owner: Responsibility typically falls upon the proprietor of the dog for negligence resulting in any harm caused by their pet.

– Strict Liability Clause of Illinois: Under this provision, as long as the victim did not provoke the animal or was conducting himself/herself peaceably at the location where bit occurred, even if it’s owned by dog owner he/she has full right to receive undiluted compensation.

– Psychological damages accounting: Most people only consider physical harms incurred from a dog bite incident; however, psychological repercussions such post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) may also accrue significant medical costs over time.

Various types of damages can potentially be included while tabulating rightful compensation for anyone suffering from a serious Dog Bite Injury. Some involve direct financial impacts such as medical expenses associated with injuries, surgical procedures or therapies required following injury incidents. Others might fall under non-economic damage umbrella like pain & suffering endured due to attack inflicted brutality.

At times, dealing directly with insurance parties after an accident might seem like swift path initiating recovery process onset. However always remember that initial offers devised by insurance companies may lean intriguingly low-balled endeavour undermining actual damages magnitude encountered. Our tenacious legal team adamantly asserts on our clients’ behalf, keeping relentless pursuit rolling for obtaining you most favorable resolution possible.

Due to Carlson Bier’s vast experience in this field, we can determine if insurance providers are not offering fair deals or have used policy exclusions to deny claims related to dog bite incidents unjustly. Knowing your rights and working comprehensively towards claiming justice is a path best undertaken with a knowledgeable personal injury attorney by your side.

The attorneys at Carlson Bier are versed profoundly in the intricacies of Illinois law pertaining to Dog Bite Injuries. We fight tirelessly advocating deserved compensation encapsulating every iota of the harm inflicted – physically as well as mentally. Having been victims’ mode of recourse myriad times, we understand these crimes’ devastating aftermath and stand fervently committed to securing optimal restitution assisting them in their recovery quest.

If you’re grappling with Dog Bite Injury repercussions currently and feeling overwhelmed amidst its turbulent tide, we encourage you not compounding your suffering alone. Let us traverse through this daunting phase together. We believe that regardless of where incidences occur within Illinois State jurisdiction, unparalleled accountability should prevail ensuring utmost safety right protection of every individual around dogs – considered human’s best friend ideally.

We cordially invite you now to utilize an exclusive feature on our website: a button conspicuously placed below providing immediate access expediting your case’s evaluation by our skilful attorneys thereby revealing estimated worth lying under rightful claim veil soonest possible. Make use of resource without any obligation presented there right before you to gain initial insight into how much value could ensue from pursuing a legal course post unfortunate incident executed via one single click grounding potential game-changing impact illuminating justice-seeking pathway effectively!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For North Pekin Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in North Pekin

Areas of Practice in North Pekin

Bike Crashes

Specializing in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or risky conditions.

Fire Wounds

Providing expert legal support for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Delivering specialist legal support for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Liability

Handling cases involving defective products, offering professional legal assistance to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Slip Mishaps

Skilled in addressing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking compensation for their damages.

Birth Injuries

Extending legal help for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Focused on assisting clients of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for damages and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing legal support for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Semi Mishap

Delivering specialist legal representation for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Worksite Crashes

Focused on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal representation for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Wounds

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Unjust Death

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure redress.

Spine Trauma

Dedicated to advocating for persons with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal assistance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​