...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Princeton

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the unfortunate circumstance of a dog bite injury in Princeton, you need a committed legal team working tirelessly on your behalf. Carlson Bier is the top-tier choice for such cases. As personal injury lawyers, our expertize lies in addressing complex issues surrounding dog bite injuries. We offer unrivalled legal acumen combined with compassionate counseling to navigate these unpredictable events and ensure just compensation is pursued.

Our history defending victims of dog bites has endowed us with profound insight into Illinois law. By choosing Carlson Bier as your representatives, you gain representation infused with deep expertise, helping individuals make informed decisions while safeguarding their rights during each stage of the process.

Reliability and dedication differentiate us from others; we draw upon these principles demonstrating why we are best suited for Princeton residents dealing this traumatic incident type. Our commitment to client care serves as cornerstone to our practice: at Carlson Bier no case gets treated impersonally.

When it comes to effectively handling intricate dynamics around Dog Bite Injuries claims in Illinois law – trust none other than Carlson Bier- Striving hard towards resolving clients’ concerns through thorough professionalism and unwavering focus.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Princeton Illinois

Dealing with a dog bite injury can be a traumatic and confusing ordeal. As experienced personal injury attorneys, the law firm of Carlson Bier aims to provide comprehensive information on such incidents to help you navigate through these arduous legal processes. Located within Illinois, Carlson Bier consists of professional lawyers proficient in state laws and regulations pertaining to dog bites and other animal-related injuries.

Dog bites can lead to serious harm including physical pain, emotional trauma, fear of dogs (known as cynophobia), or life-altering injuries business losses due to prolonged hospitalization. It’s pertinent for victims of such incidents to understand that under Illinois law they have the right to seek compensation from the errant pet owner for damages incurred.

The key points you should take note of include:

• Dog owners are liable for any injury their pets inflict unprovoked provided that the victim was conducting themselves peaceably in a location where they were legally permitted.

• The ‘One Bite Rule’ does not apply in Illinois. That means even if this is the first incident where the dog has bitten someone, its owner remains fully accountable.

• There are specific timeframes – commonly known as statutes of limitation – within which you need present your case in court. In Illinois, this limit is generally set at two years from the date of biting.

Being well-informed about these aspects will empower you when it comes to seeking the justice deserved; however navigating through murky legal waters can prove challenging for most individuals who lack substantial knowledge and experience in addressing dog bite cases effectively which brings us exactly why we recommend our services at Carlson Bier.

Every year in America there are nearly 4.5 million individuals bitten by dogs according to data from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Among those affected a whopping 20% require immediate medical attention ranging from minor injuries like puncture wounds lacerations bruises scratches infections possible diseases transmission especially rabies achieving rightful settlements often necessitates additional expertise Carlson Bier although not located Princeton Illinois well equipped assist within jurisdiction given their strong experience practice.

Having dealt with numerous dog bite cases successfully, our attorneys have honed a keen understanding of the varying complexities that these personal injury claims present. They are skilled at crafting robust legal strategies that cater to each unique case, taking into consideration factors like nature of injury, possible negligence on victim’s part or any other external influencing variables.

As compassionate and committed professionals, we also take pride in supporting our clients emotionally during what can be an extremely stressful process. Our lawyers work diligently to secure the fair compensation you deserve while ensuring minimal disruption to your life during this trying period.

In conclusion, if you or a loved one has been subjected to a traumatic dog bite incident in Illinois–not Princeton – please know that there exist experts at Carlson Bier dedicated to aiding your pursuit towards justice. A self-assessment won’t amount to a detailed evaluation conducted by experienced personal injury attorneys who’ve had proven successes in similar disputes. So why not get us involved as early as possible?

Give yourself some peace of mind by utilizing appropriate legal assistance when staking claim for damages from non-prudent pet owners causing harm through their animals. Make it even better by choosing us; top-tiered personal injury attorneys for victims of dog bites and animal-inflicted injuries based right here – in Illinois!

Don’t leave any stone unturned when dealing with sensitive matters such as this which involves emotional trauma physical pain potential threat health infection frequently mistaken notion insignificant injuries moderate value cases fallacy thinking settling dispute without engaging expert support Recall facts especially opening doors tremendous opportunities individuals unfortunately fallen prey negligent canine handling

Do more than scratch surface delve deeper uncover possibilities retained overlooked enthusiastic commitment transforms precarious situations confident prospective success victories testimonials past clients speak volumes about efficacy services offer …without losing ounce empathy compassion course being catalyst will facilitate holistic recovery Ending note encourage click button below find much case worth chance realign imbalance struck like ve believe providing legal navigational beacon guiding light amid sorted considerations. Embark journey towards justice Carlson Bier – because deserve better. Always ready understand empathize assist consultations secured privacy utmost confidentiality priority Click now explore options remember every step taken direction empowerment.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Princeton Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Princeton

Areas of Practice in Princeton

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Burn Burns

Offering adept legal advice for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Providing expert legal advice for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Accountability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering specialist legal guidance to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Neglect

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Tumble Incidents

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Traumas

Supplying legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Crashes: Devoted to aiding patients of car accidents get reasonable payout for injuries and losses.

Scooter Collisions

Committed to providing representation for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Big Rig Accident

Providing professional legal services for drivers involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for losses.

Building Crashes

Dedicated to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Head Damages

Expert in providing compassionate legal representation for victims suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Expertise in addressing cases for people who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Demise

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and skilled legal services to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on representing clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​