...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Golden

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the aftermath of a dog bite injury, you need an experienced legal team on your side. The Carlson Bier attorney group is invaluable in this regard, providing expert guidance and representation for such cases throughout Illinois – including Golden city. They have comprehensive knowledge about dog bite laws, practicing their law services with utmost diligence to secure the most favorable outcomes for clients impacted by these incidents. Over considerable years of operation in this specific category of personal injuries law, Carlson Bier has amassed impressive track records in securing rightful compensation for dog bite victims from responsible parties. With their understanding of complex liability issues tied to animal attacks within different cities’ jurisdictions, rest assured that you are receiving impeccable professional assistance completely aligned with Illinois’s statutory regulations and norms. From navigating negotiations between disputing parties to presenting compelling evidence at trial stages if necessary- Carlson Bier consistently delivers excellence throughout every step of the proceeding- making them a reliable consideration for any dog bite injury case across all corners of our state.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Golden Illinois

Understanding the complex nature of dog bite injuries and the potentially devastating effects it can have on its victims, our dedicated team at Carlson Bier aims to provide comprehensive law services that help you navigate through such difficult times. Our Illinois-based lawyers specialize in personal injury cases, ensuring that your rights are aptly protected and justified.

Dog bite injuries rank among the top causes of nonfatal injuries within Illinois, leaving many victims with emotional trauma, high medical bills, permanent disfigurement or disability. It is essential for every victim to fully grasp their legal rights following such an incident. Under the Illinois Animal Control Act, a dog’s owner is completely liable for any injuries caused by their pet if the victim:

• Was peaceably conducting themselves,

• was in a place where they were legally entitled to be,

• did not provoke, incite or otherwise encourage harmful behavior from the dog.

This essentially means that as long as you didn’t instigate aggression from a canine which led to your injury while intruding upon someone else’s premises illegally, then you’re likely eligible for compensation. The obligations place under law on owners extend both encompassing keeping their pets restrained appropriately and managing their behavior effectively in order to ensure safety of others around them.

Civil law underlines vital principles applicable when representing clients who have suffered from dog bite injuries. If hard proof can be provided that links your injury directly back to another party’s negligence involving their pet, then our seasoned attorneys at Carlson Bier will strive relentlessly towards fighting for justice on your behalf with utmost skill and diligence.

A notable point often overlooked is whether there were previous signs indicating violent tendencies within the animal involved prior to this incidence – these factors may greatly influence eventual settlements obtained either through negotiation or trial.

Moreover one must realize that timeframes hold decisive value in litigation related cases; waiting excessively may permit crucial evidence pertaining your incidence fade away thus weakening your stance greatly. Typically dog bite claims should be lodged within two years from the incident, lest it may exceed statute of limitations for injury or damage claims.

Accomplished professionals at Carlson Bier fully recognize how demanding a dog bite ordeal may turn out to be. Undertaking meticulous investigation to ensure effective representation, they facilitate customized solutions catering to unique needs of every individual client providing inclusive assistance throughout different stages encompassing consultations, examinations and trial preparations if need arises.

It is our mission at Carlson Bier to illuminate the path towards a secure future by ensuring you are compensated fairly against your trauma both mentally and physically. While no sum can totally erase painful memories or restore your wellbeing completely following such an unfortunate event but appropriate financial relief does alleviate stressors relating medical bills, loss earnings while aiding rehabilitation effectively and that certainly represents a step forward in process of healing.

We hereby hope that this understanding regarding intricacies involved in dog bite lawsuits helps any victims seeking clarity under these specific situations. If you’re currently debating whether having suffered dog bite injury makes you eligible for compensation claim; we invite all concerned individuals consider availing free case evaluation on offer below. Our competent team would provide earnest analysis thereby aiding your decision making through rational insights and expert advice. Take the leap today – just one click below could potentially change course of future helping rediscover much-needed peace subtly leading towards normalcy once again.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Golden Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Golden

Areas of Practice in Golden

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving expert legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Misconduct

Delivering expert legal representation for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Responsibility

Taking on cases involving faulty products, delivering skilled legal services to individuals affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Stumble Incidents

Professional in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking redress for their suffering.

Childbirth Wounds

Extending legal assistance for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Accidents: Focused on aiding clients of car accidents gain reasonable compensation for injuries and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal support for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Trucking Collision

Offering expert legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for hurts.

Construction Site Accidents

Engaged in assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Harms

Expert in extending expert legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Damages

Expertise in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Specializing in legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Dedicated to defending persons with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​