...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Edinburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the aftermath of a traumatic dog bite injury, you require expert legal representation to secure fair compensation. As such, consider Carlson Bier for tenacious advocacy and dedicated support in navigating this harrowing ordeal. Our reputation as exceptional personal injury attorneys is rooted in our uncompromising commitment towards clients’ rights and well-being. Based out of Illinois, our seasoned lawyers are adept at handling dog bite injuries with an understanding of both emotional trauma victims experience and complex legal framework governing such incidents. While we serve various localities efficiently, the residents in Edinburg can expect continued dedication from us just like any other region where we work diligently on your case without compromise on attention or expertise. At Carlson Bier, you are not just another case; by offering personalized approach blended with impressive execution skills help us stand superior among peers when it comes to providing top-notch legal aid for canine-related harm sufferers anywhere including Edinburg.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Edinburg Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the personal trauma experienced by victims of dog bite injuries. As a premier personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, we specialize in representing and assisting victims through such difficult times with committed legal strategies based on our broad experience. Dog bites may seem simple but they could lead to grave injuries and prolonged suffering; sometimes evoking psychological distress as well.

The intricacies of dog bite cases track a unique structure which demands special consideration—something that our competent team offers seamlessly. Delving into the depth of the incidents, understanding victim’s turmoil, dealing with insurance companies and ensuring comprehensive medical reports form the base of our proactive approach towards these cases.

Dog bites can cause varied forms of harm that require immediate clinical intervention:

• Puncture wounds

• Infection risks including rabies

• Nerve damage

• Scarring or disfigurement

Apart from physical ramifications, dog bite victims often suffer from emotional trauma and psychological aftereffects like fear or anxiety disorders. At Carlson Bier, we inject sensitivity and compassion while handling such intimate representation coupled with an intent to bring justice swiftly.

In Illinois state laws have established strict liability for dog owners when it comes down to attacks unless the person bitten was trespassing or provoking the pet – a law pattern known as ‘One Bite Rule.’ Understanding this is critical for protecting your rights to fair compensation.

When dealing with insurance companies post-dog bites accidents remember:

• Insurance settlements might not adjust for long-term medical needs related to incidents.

• Not all insurers are willing to cover all expenses put forth; requiring sturdy backing for negotiation.

• Having experienced legal assistance like us can play pivotally in claiming rightful damages covering both economic (medical bills) & non-economic damages (emotional distress).

To ensure you get compensated fairly, having detailed documentation about your case plays an important role:

• Comprehensive records of medical diagnoses/treatment provided

• Photographs of injury

• Evidence of owner’s negligence, if present

• Details about the dog involved in the event

Our seasoned attorneys help analyze your unique situation and craft an individual legal plan to enforce your rights under Illinois law diligently. Armed with experience, expertise and empathy, Carlson Bier assists not just with sterling representation but anchors you through healing and recovery.

Understanding how much your case is worth is a critical first step towards deciding the path ahead. In such distressing times, it’s essential to rely on an expert who can provide objective guidance. Our team at Carlson Bier evaluates every angle of a case to calculate its fair value accurately based on informed criteria like medical expenses (past & future), loss of income due to disability or suffering caused by disfigurement/scar.

Securing full range compensation demands persistent advocacy – something which is second nature for us at Carlson Bier. We are committed to making sure every victim receives comprehensive care,full justice and meaningful closure they truly deserve.

Lastly, we invite you to delve deeper into understanding what potential your claim holds using our specialized calculator below. Click now to find out how much your case is worth and remember, rule number one: Never Settle For Less than You Deserve!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Edinburg Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Edinburg

Areas of Practice in Edinburg

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Damages

Offering specialist legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering expert legal support for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Obligation

Handling cases involving unsafe products, extending expert legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Trip Accidents

Professional in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their harm.

Infant Traumas

Supplying legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to assisting individuals of car accidents get just remuneration for wounds and damages.

Bike Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal advice for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Semi Accident

Offering experienced legal support for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for losses.

Construction Collisions

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cognitive Harms

Committed to offering expert legal representation for clients suffering from head injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unfair Demise

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Impairment

Expert in defending clients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer