...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Dixon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you have experienced a dog bite injury in Dixon, the premier choice for your legal representation is Carlson Bier. We are an accomplished law firm specializing in personal injury cases and our team of meticulous attorneys ensure that justice is served to those suffering from unanticipated canine attacks. Our knowledge about Illinois’s complex dog bite laws makes us well-equipped to tackle diverse types of such distressing incidents — robustly arguing on your behalf within the folds of legality. The high standards kept by Carlson Bier promise diligent action and an empathetic approach right from documentation to litigation, all aimed at securing maximum compensation for victims’ pains, loss of earnings, or medical treatment costs resulting from this traumatizing event—a commitment we believe embodies true advocacy work and lifts up unfortunate victims. If you’ve fallen prey to such an incident – regardless if it has led to minor injuries or ravaging impairments – trust no one other than Carlson Bier; every Dog Bite Injury claim deserves our level of expertise and dedicated involvement.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Dixon Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the physical and psychological trauma that often accompanies dog-bite injuries. As experienced personal injury attorneys in Illinois, it’s our role to not only advocate for your legal rights but also to educate you on key aspects of what a dog bite case entails.

In many cases, victims are unaware that they have the right to financial compensation after experiencing a dog bite. However, being bitten by a dog can have serious health-related implications such as infections, permanent scarring or disfigurement. It could potentially lead to long-term mental distress including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Moreover, it can result in considerable financial burdens due to medical expenses related to surgery or ongoing treatment and therapy.

Understood within the realm of ‘personal injury’ law, here is what constitutes key elements of a viable dog bite case:

• Identify Ownership: The owner of the dog must be identifiable for liability reasons. This typically involves acquiring license records from local animal control offices.

• Intention vs Negligence: If the owner intentionally set their pet against another person then punishment is almost guaranteed; however even if their pet attacked without provocation because of inadequate control measures or negligent behavior then usually there is recourse too.

• Injuries Documented: Photographs and detailed medical reports from healthcare providers should be collected immediately following treatment. These serve as hard evidence concerning the extent of injuries suffered.

Navigating through these essentials maybe stressful and overwhelming which is why our dedicated team at Carlson Bier steps in – advocating for your rights while you heal physically and emotionally. Protecting your interests will always be paramount to us.

Further, compensations vary depending on several factors like severity of injury sustained, costs associated with treatments & rehabilitative care along with impacts on income & quality-of-life negotiations during claim settlement process. Calculations often include:

• Medical Bills Coverage: Compensation generally includes coverage for immediate emergency aid as well as any future medical costs related to the incident such as surgery, medication or therapy appointments.

• Wage Loss: If the victim has been incapable of going to work due to injuries suffered, they are eligible for lost wages compensation.

• Pain and Suffering: The physical pain accompanied by emotional stress can accounted into what is regarded as ‘pain and suffering’. This does not have a price tag; however financial compensation can be sought with help from experienced legal counsel like our team at Carlson Bier.

Understanding your rights regarding dog bite law goes beyond knowing that help exists in seeking justice. At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe in arming you with comprehensive information so that you’re better able to make informed decisions about your situation. We strive towards ensuring that everyone who walks through our doors fully understands their rights under Illinois law leaving no room for fear or doubt.

If you’ve been a victim of a dog bite injury, achieving justice may seem daunting but rest assured you’re not alone. Take control of your situation now! Our skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier are ready to evaluate your claim, strategically guide you through the process and aggressively push for the maximum settlement deserved.

Find out how much potential compensation could be waiting for you due to this unfortunate event. We understand what’s truly at stake here – it’s more than just numbers. It’s about regaining control over your life post-injury; obtaining closure & justice simultaneously while reclaiming peace-of-mind which is priceless! Use this moment as an empowered step towards recovery – click on the button below and let us give you an accurate valuation for your case right away.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dixon Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Dixon

Areas of Practice in Dixon

Cycling Incidents

Expert in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Extending specialist legal services for victims of major burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Medical Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal representation for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Responsibility

Taking on cases involving problematic products, delivering professional legal assistance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Trip Accidents

Expert in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Offering legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Accidents

Crashes: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents gain just payout for injuries and losses.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Committed to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Semi Mishap

Ensuring specialist legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for losses.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in offering expert legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Damages

Specialized in managing cases for people who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and experienced legal support to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Committed to advocating for patients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​