...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Georgetown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When suffering from the traumatic impact of a dog bite injury in Georgetown, contacting Carlson Bier Law Firm is imperative. With extensive expertise and experience related to such cases, they are well-equipped to lead you throughout your struggle for justice. Navigating legal complexities can be overwhelming especially when dealing with physical and emotional pain; this is where our lawyers from Carlson Bier come into play. Their astute understanding of Illinois’s dog bite laws enables them to passionately advocate on your behalf, ensuring you get the compensation worthy of your distress caused by dog bites injuries. You deserve an accomplished attorney group that prioritizes the interest of their clients over anything else – precisely what we offer at Carlson Bier Law Firm! The personalized approach is central to our work culture as it empowers us to devise optimum strategies according to individual client needs.This unrivaled attention towards developing proficient strategy makes us stand out among other firms altogether making a perfect choice for Dog Bite Injury cases – trusted battlefield companions during challenging times in pursuit of justice and recompense!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Georgetown Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to providing legal representation with the utmost diligence and dedication for those who need it most. It is essential for you as our valued client to understand the intricacies of your personal injury case. In particular, a unique class of these cases pertains to dog bite injuries – an occurrence all too common in the state of Illinois that should not be taken lightly.

Dog bites can inflict more than just physical pain; they often have emotional and psychological consequences as well. The victim might suffer from fear, depression, or in some cases Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Hence it’s critical to recognize their seriousness and work towards obtaining rightful compensation.

• Dog bites carry risk of bacterial infections including Pasteurella, MRSA or Tetanus

• Sometimes severe bites result in disfigurements necessitating surgeries

• The emotional distress following a dog bite cannot be underestimated

Understanding Illinois’ strict liability law regarding such incidents is crucial. This law stipulates that the owner of the dog is legally responsible for damages caused by their pet biting another person without provocation, regardless of whether the dog has been violent before or not. Our attorneys are intimately acquainted with this law and will use this knowledge to help you claim lawful restitution.

The process commences with documenting your injury thoroughly at its earliest stage since evidence plays a key role in substantiating your claim further down the line. A medical examination right after being bitten by a dog can provide invaluable data about your health situation resulting from this unfortunate incident.

Our seasoned team then evaluates your case meticulously through every angle – assessing medical bills, loss incurred due to time away from work, as well as retrospective trauma effects on life quality post-accident. In light of this comprehensive information, we strategize an approach tailored specifically around maximizing your reparation amount while respecting timelines outlined by statutes limitation applicable within Illinois jurisdiction

Your rights are also pivotal amidst all proceedings; understanding which are innately yours from the outset versus those that you’ll need to assert during specific stages of your case is essential. In Illinois, victims possess a two-year time frame starting from when the bite occurred to file a lawsuit against the dog owner with potential exceptions depending on age and mental competence considerations.

If a minor child or mentally incompetent person experienced injury via dog bite, they have up until their 18th birthday under situation negatives for minor child and two years post improvement on circumstances that initially deemed them unfit due to mental incapacity providing them ample opportunity if desired efficiently forward lawsuit proceedings at later stage.

That’s why you must count on legal representatives who explicitly grasp this law’s nuances like Carlson Bier. We pride ourselves on our proven record in negotiating settlements or arguing cases in lawsuits successfully where we’ve persistently fetched recompenses above average within industry norms. With around-the-clock attention given towards updates as soon they break out from courthouse records, our firm ensures no crucial detail ever slips by unnoticed or unattended.

As pioneers in personal injury law specializing particularly within realm of bites reported throughout state Illinois, Carlson Bier assures justice served favoring side silently suffering through aftermath violent dog attack. By ensconcing hustling bustling dynamic lives bearing burden ineffective domestic animals regulations longer than bearable period time offer bleak respite floundering hopes ultimate relief ensuing nightmare.

We take great pride in building strong lasting relationships that speak volumes about our dedicated client-centric approach ensuring consistent availability whenever requiring our expert counsel while devising strategies will massively edge over wrongdoers put place rightfully deserved amounts reimbursements both emotional financial respects

Every single inch roadway traversed seeking justice matters; hence don’t hesitate till tomorrow what take action today before window closes strengthening winning chances multi-folds saving immense amounts stress lurking nearer edge days pile grueling inspections prying eyes insurance companies claim adjusters galore brace themselves contest facts face harsh realities

You’re invited now to explore further how much your case could be potentially worth. We have seen firsthand the life-altering impact of dog bite injuries and we are committed to making the law work for you in your quest for justice. Click on the button below that leads to our free case evaluation tool. This easy-to-use feature provides a wealth of information and guidance calibrated by years of practical experience in navigating personal injury cases like yours. Connect with us now at Carlson Bier, where every story matters, every client counts, and every victory reinforces our pledge for diligent representation. Let us journey together on this path towards meaningful victory.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Georgetown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Georgetown

Areas of Practice in Georgetown

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing professional legal services for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Incompetence

Providing professional legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Responsibility

Addressing cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal assistance to victims affected by defective items.

Elder Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Tumble Injuries

Expert in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking recovery for their damages.

Neonatal Injuries

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Committed to supporting individuals of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for wounds and destruction.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Expert in providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Trucking Collision

Ensuring expert legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for hurts.

Construction Site Incidents

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Neurological Traumas

Dedicated to providing compassionate legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in handling cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unjust Death

Working for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and expert legal representation to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on representing clients with paralysis, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​