...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mitchell

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier demonstrates an unparalleled dedication to their clients’ utmost well-being. Specializing in dog bite injuries, our team of attorneys possesses the extensive experience and knowledge necessary for navigating these complex cases in Illinois. Every year, countless individuals suffer from the devastating aftermath of canine attacks, leaving them physically injured and financially strained due to excessive medical fees. Carlson Bier firmly believes that victims should not bear the brunt of these overwhelming circumstances, therefore we strive to deliver comprehensive legal assistance with empathy and keen attention. Interviewing eyewitnesses, analyzing medical reports are only a fraction of what we do to ensure our clients receive fair compensation for their distressing experiences. Choosing Carlson Bier signifies choosing relentless advocates who will tirelessly fight on your behalf across any city within Illinois – particularly significant when considering Mitchell’s notorious incidents involving aggressive dogs biting residents. Ultimately, becoming a client doesn’t only mean embarking on a journey toward justice but also feeling confident knowing that you have top-notch representation rooted deeply in commitment towards bringing light into even the gravest situations surrounding dog bite injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mitchell Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a premier Illinois law firm, we understand the trauma and distress that a dog bite can cause. We specialize in personal injury law, providing our clients with exceptional legal assistance to ensure they receive the compensation they deserve when they’ve been victimized in such incidents.

A dog bite by itself may seem fairly innocuous; however, its ramifications can be haemorrhagic: spiralling medical bills for infection treatment, serious physical harm including nerve damage or disfigurement and psychological trauma. Many individuals fail to realize everything that goes into addressing these issues afterwards.

Renowned as Illinois’ top-notch personal injury attorneys, we at Carlson Bier urge victims of dog bite injuries not to underestimate their predicament; seeking professional advice is directly linked towards constructing an effective case. Here are some things you should know about dog bites:

• Strict Liability State: In Illinois, dog owners are held accountable irrespective of whether the canine has displayed aggressive tendencies earlier. It underscores that even if animal behaviour wasn’t anticipatable – you have rights worth pursuing.

• Statute of Limitations: A two-year time frame exists within which filing a claim is viable – missing this deadline could significantly impede asserting your rights effectively.

• Proving Negligence: Establishing proof of owner’s negligence is crucial – showing the owner failed to exercise reasonable caution resulting in your injury holds pivotal routine for your claim’s success.

Understanding these aspects serves as an initial step towards building a strong case. Retaining our services ensures extensive knowledge support combined with hands-on experience walking you through each stage involved making legal demands post-injury.

Knowing what actions need immediate implementation following a dog bite supports significant enhancement on claim values potential:

– Seek Medical Help Promptly: This aids in preventing condition degradation additionally furnishing vital evidence linking your injuries directly related to the incident.

– Document All Evidences: Photos of wounds pre-treatment more often than not increase chances of successful claims.

– Report The Incident: It’s important to inform local authorities about the incident, ensuring proper documentation which could serve as key evidence during claim processing.

Primed to provide tailored assistance, where we listen first and only then advise – we excel in comprehending each situation’s unique nuances. Carlson Bier attorneys cut through legal jargon and complexities simplifying them upon client conversations, making it easily comprehensible enhancing informed decision-making capabilities.

Injuries associated with dog bites represent an often overlooked category within personal injury enclosures demanding meticulous attention towards obtaining rightful compensation. A dedicated team of professionals at Carlson Bier aids in accomplishing just that! We go extra miles identifying every possible legal avenue augmenting your winning chances whether involving negotiations for out-of-court settlement or asserting rights during trials.

Our firm isn’t located in Mitchell; however, our expertise spans across Illinois advocating clients’ rightful stand against unjust injuries without restrictions stricken geographical boundaries.

Remember that engaging professional representation can be a game-changer when dealing with blocks of stress post-dog bite incidence. Explore receiving valuable guidance pertinent to your case from Illinois’ leading personal injury lawyers – an investment that’s absolutely critical for both short term relief and long-term security considering overall health implications subsequently appearing from untreated or poorly treated wounds.

At Carlson Bier, immense value doesn’t merely exit on strategizing exceptional victories but rests on building stronger relationships’, focused consistently providing top-tier services aimed specifically at securing lives past traumatic experiences returning them back to normal tracks.

Are you victimized by a dog bite? Find out how much your case is worth by clicking the button below to get started with expert consultation from our respected attorneys who understand your strife undertaking necessary actions bringing justice served right onto your platter.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Mitchell Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mitchell

Areas of Practice in Mitchell

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Extending professional legal services for people of severe burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Providing dedicated legal assistance for victims affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Handling cases involving faulty products, offering expert legal assistance to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Neglect

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Stumble Incidents

Professional in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking restitution for their damages.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal support for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Incidents: Committed to aiding individuals of car accidents secure appropriate payout for wounds and losses.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Incident

Delivering adept legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for injuries.

Building Incidents

Committed to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Impairments

Dedicated to delivering professional legal support for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Wounds

Skilled in handling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Passing

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and experienced legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Dedicated to defending clients with spine impairments, offering professional legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​