...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Farina

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unexpected events such as dog bite injuries transpire, swift and decisive legal action is crucial. That’s exactly the service you can anticipate from Carlson Bier – a formidable advocate in this specialized field of personal injury law based in Illinois. In cases of dog bite injuries, intimate understanding of policy nuances and regional ordinances could make all the difference to your verdict. Through countless successful cases under our belt precisely within this arena, we’ve honed our ability to keenly navigate it effectively for clients seeking just compensation for their ordeal. You deserve representation that genuinely comprehends the weight these incidents hold and treats them accordingly – not an uncaring entity disconnected from your reality or one merely boasting shallow experience in such issues: that’s where Carlson Bier reigns supreme because we thrive on delivering results rather than empty assurances! For nonpareil professional advice on dog bite injuries whether you’re based locally or farther away like Farina- count on us at Carlson Bier! Our dedication bursts through geographical boundaries, earning us faithful clientele throughout Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Farina Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we provide expert legal representation for victims of dog bite injuries. Based in Illinois, our compassionate team boasts years of experience navigating the nuances of personal injury law. When a dog bite or animal attack occurs, it can result in not only physical damage but also psychological distress. Through our detailed educational materials and guidance, we strive to bring value to our clients by simplifying complex legalities related to dog bite injuries into easily digestible information.

Understanding your rights is pivotal when dealing with a dog bite injury case. As part of our free advice service:

• We will guide you on how to handle insurance companies following an incident.

• Our experts will shed light on what counts as negligence in these cases.

• We’ll elaborate upon the role played by animal control reports in bolstering your claim.

Dog bites are traumatic events that hurt millions every year across America. Most victims aren’t aware they can seek compensation from the responsible party’s homeowner insurance policy most times. In order to effectively do this:

• You need evidence: Seek immediate medical attention post-incident and ensure documentation of each measure taken after the attack.

• Gather eyewitness accounts: They could play a crucial role during litigation.

Always remember – it’s important that as a victim you should not be burdened with medical costs or lost wages due to someone else’s failure to control their pet adequately.

In connection with Illinois law – and further proving why professional legal guidance is key – local statutes dictate that if the owner ‘knew or should have known’ about the aggressive nature of their pet, they become potentially liable for damages caused by their pet attacking innocent parties without provocation.

Additionally:

• A waiver signed at a kennel doesn’t absolve them from liability if you are bitten by one of their Dogs

• Landlords might be held accountable too if tenants’ dogs were violent and led to harm

With such intricacies existent within the sphere of Illinois dog bite law, Adler & Manson assures total legal assistance and support. Our commitment to justice combined with a deep understanding of the system puts us in an ideal position to get you the compensation you rightfully deserve.

If you’ve been unfortunate enough to become a victim of a dog attack, it’s natural that issues such as medical bills, rehabilitation costs, emotional trauma may feel overwhelming. But help is at hand – our team will work tirelessly towards ensuring maximum payout for your suffering while helping you recover from this ordeal both physically and mentally.

We consider it critical that victims understand the risk associated with attempting to navigate complex insurance negotiation procedures without expert guidance:

• Insurers’ primary responsibility lies not with victims but their share-holders.

• They employ dedicated teams whose sole purpose is reducing claims’ payouts.

Armed with knowledge about these potential pitfalls will aid in choosing the right course of action post-incident. Remember, being ill-prepared can put adequate compensation at stake hence why Selarz Law Corp preaches absolute preparedness when dealing with scenarios like these.

Finally – be sure to click on the button below for a free claim consultation. Immediate legal advice helps build stronger cases, and most importantly gives you peace of mind during such taxing times. Trust experts who have decades worth experience fighting insurance companies so you get what’s rightfully yours; remember accurate assessment can only be given by professionals who deal with cases similar on regular basis.

At Carlson Bier: Your struggle today is part of your strength tomorrow! Let’s overcome this together- Click below now to find out how much your case could potentially be worth and take one firm step towards justice!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Farina Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Farina

Areas of Practice in Farina

Cycling Mishaps

Focused on legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Scald Burns

Extending expert legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Delivering experienced legal representation for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Accountability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, delivering professional legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Tumble Injuries

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking restitution for their suffering.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal help for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Accidents: Focused on supporting sufferers of car accidents get appropriate remuneration for harms and destruction.

Scooter Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal advice for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Trucking Accident

Providing specialist legal representation for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for hurts.

Building Mishaps

Dedicated to assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Cognitive Harms

Specializing in extending specialized legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Injuries

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Collisions

Specializing in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spine Harm

Specializing in supporting individuals with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer