FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Near South Side

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When suffering from unfortunate dog bite injuries, the pressing need for capable legal representation is inevitable. In this regard, Carlson Bier stands out as an unrivaled advocate on your behalf. As a leading Illinois-based personal injury law firm, we have maintained an unwavering commitment to securing justice and fair compensation for victims of dog attacks. Our team exemplifies expertise in navigating through complex state regulations surrounding dog bite injuries while taking into account the emotional trauma you may be experiencing. With Carlson Bier at your side, every aspect of your case receives meticulous attention – ensuring maximum recovery and peace of mind during such stressful times. We urge residents living in or near the South Side area who are grappling with these distressing incidents to connect with us; experience how our dedicated attorneys can help turn around difficult situations seamlessly.

Despite not being situated in said locale physically we continuously extend our professional services to victims there and pride ourselves on making their journey towards recompense a bit less arduous by offering unmatched litigation support throughout Illinois.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Near South Side Illinois

Dog bite injuries, a common yet overlooked source of personal hardship, inflict both physical and emotional pain on victims. As Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys – based in Illinois, we possess extensive experience in successfully representing victims of dog bites with understanding and professional expertise. We know how to navigate the complexities of such cases while ensuring that your rights are prioritized at every juncture in these often emotionally charged situations.

Dog bites can lead to serious injury, causing not only physical damage but also severe emotional distress due to their sudden and traumatic nature. Both adults and children may face disfigurement or painful lacerations requiring stitches; there may also be infection risks or long-term difficulties as nerve damage result from these incidents. One should note:

• Immediate medical attention aids full recovery

• Photographs of your injuries support evidence

• You should record names and other pertinent contact information for witnesses

All this is crucial as it provides demonstrative proof which bolsters the case against any negligent pet owner.

As if dealing with physical repercussions were not enough, you might grapple with psychiatric issues such as fear-related disorders arising from adverse dog encounters. These psychological effects could include Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) altering the victim’s perspective towards canines completely, irrespective of age:

• Children traumatized by dog attacks require therapy sessions

• Adults may have heightened anxiety levels when near dogs

These points indicate that the impacts aren’t just limited to wounds; they affect life quality substantially—something for which compensation is justified.

In Illinois where we practice, laws favor victims bitten by dogs unless proven provoked by alleged prey. The statutes outline specific responsibilities for pet owners ensuring public safety concerns are addressed adequately:

• Dog owners must control their pets preventing possible dangerous actions

• Owners failing secure measures procedure make themselves liable

Knowledge about state-specific laws essential in determining whether one has a valid claim or not forms an area where our specialization speaks volumes. We, at Carlson Bier, analyze the incident circumstances from a legal lens offering our seasoned viewpoint that helps you make informed decisions.

Furthermore, a knowledge-rich approach is quintessential when pursuing dog bite injury cases; there are critical time limits or statutes of limitations placed on filing such claims providing typically up to two years:

• File your claim within the prescribed period to ensure its legality

• Delayed submissions can result in losing potential compensations

Your prompt and accurate actions can mean the difference between receiving rightful justice and experiencing further emotional distress due to lost opportunities. That’s where we come on board supervising these aspects meticulously so you have fewer reasons to worry about missing out during this demanding time.

At Carlson Bier Personal Injury Attorneys, we understand – no amount of reparation can entirely make up for physical torment or emotional sufferings inflicted by dog bites: but it would certainly ease financial burdens caused by medical expenses, therapy sessions, and perhaps even loss of earnings if injuries lead to an inability to work temporarily:

• Medical bills reimbursement tallies towards your compensation

• Lost wages owing to healing downtime constitutes fair game

• Therapy costs reflect in settlements justly compensating psychological damages

In essence, seeking professional guidance is not so much an option as it is a necessity while dealing with personal injury instances like dog bites. Emotional upheaval combined with unfamiliar territory could leave one confused and possibly deprived when soliciting indemnity alone. You need experienced representatives who listen empathetically as well as guide you legally—the kind that Carlson Bier proudly identifies itself as.

Curious how exactly your claim stacks against Illinois’ legal landscape? Wondering what monetary relief awaits based on impact severity? Click the button below for more personalized information concerning your case’s standing. As renowned Personal Injury Attorneys rooted centrally in Illinois and serving across regions without any false location pretense—your quest for redress begins only a tap away with us at Carlson Bier.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Near South Side Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Near South Side

Areas of Practice in Near South Side

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Extending professional legal support for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Clinical Misconduct

Providing professional legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, extending specialist legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Fall and Slip Occurrences

Professional in managing trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Crashes

Collisions: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents obtain just settlement for hurts and losses.

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in providing representation for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Extending specialist legal advice for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Engaged in supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal support for victims suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Damages

Adept at addressing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Expert in legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Loss

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal representation to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Committed to defending clients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​