...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in North Center

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the traumatic experience of dog bite injuries in North Center, entrusting your case to Carlson Bier ensures you receive unsurpassed legal expertise. As premier personal injury lawyers in Illinois, our unrivaled dedication and extensive knowledge regarding dog bite incidents are second to none. We navigate the intricacies of Dog Bite Injuries law with an acute attention-to-detail that maximizes client settlements. At Carlson Bier, we prioritize your recovery while meticulously building a robust defense for you as our client; ensuring all critical evidence required is adequately collected. Our commitment extends beyond just winning cases – it’s about restoring normalcy into people’s lives affected by such unfortunate events. We are adept at handling complex negotiations with insurance companies in every endeavor, never relenting until deserving compensation is obtained for medical costs and emotional distress suffered through no fault of your own. Trust Carlson Bier: relentless advocates dedicated to achieving justice in adversarial situations involving dog bites.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in North Center Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our distinguished practice in personal injury law situates us as trustworthy authorities on varying types of cases. One area we frequently encounter and have expertise in involves dog bite injuries. As a phenomenon that affects many individuals annually across Illinois, understanding the legal mechanics of dog bites is paramount.

Generally, victims bitten by dogs face both physical pain and emotional trauma. Equally debilitating can be the ensuing medical bills, loss of wages due to inability to work during recovery periods, and other associated costs following traumatic events. At Carlson Bier, we make it our professional mission to assist you through these challenges while preserving your legal rights.

Under Illinois’s laws governing this domain – primarily encapsulated within the Animal Control Act – liability over domestic animal actions rests upon their owners or individuals possessing them at time of incidents. This means that if you are injured by someone else’s dog, they may bear responsibility for compensating any damages incurred.

However, there are certain exceptions integral to grasp:

• The victim was not legally permitted on private property where the attack occurred.

• The person bitten provoked or tormented the animal preceding the incident.

Understanding these nuances accentuates aspects crucial to building a victorious case which Carlson Bier prides itself in aiding clients with.

Moreover, Illinois operates under strict liability laws concerning canine instances which renders owner negligence irrelevant so long as you meet two primary requirements:

• The defendant owned/had control over the dog.

• No provocation from the victim happened before/during attack occurrence.

It’s also imperative noticing effective representation doesn’t stop merely at understanding legislative specifics. Mastering local jurisdiction traditions alongside adopting knowledgeable strategies maximizes litigation outcomes; leveraging decades of collective experience at Carlson Bier empowers us providing such comprehensive services unselectively to our clientele base operating broadly across Illinois regions while avoiding mischaracterization about physical office locations.

Through individualized case analysis coupled with systematic mounting defenses against possible counter-arguments (e.g. alleging victim provocation), we deploy every potential avenue to ensure rightful compensation.

Furthermore, while contemplating filing lawsuits, be cautious of time limitations stipulated by Illinois; such injury claims must formally be presented within two years following incident occurrence. Misstep here could detrimentally affect successful case prosecution.

Beyond specialties with legalistic approaches surrounding dog bite incidents specifically:

• Our team assists neighbors unacquainted about shared responsibilities.

• We guide parents on keeping children safe around potentially menacing dogs.

These educational initiatives bolster our foundational commitment to client empowerment through knowledge diffusion alongside proficient legal representation for maximum benefits delivery.

Underscoring Carlson Bier’s pivotal role in navigating enormity of post-injury processes – whether assembling meticulously prepared litigations or facilitating difficult conversations demanding tactful negotiations – rest assured our unwavering dedication not just matches but exceeds your expectations paving pathways towards attaining desired results meaningfully and expediently.

Identifying accurate worthiness of your individual case can be challenging given complexities involving different factors including severity level, lengthened treatments, extented inability working due prolonged recovery phases among others; it is therefore key grasping these elements accurately to secure deserved compensations. Leveraging our hard-earned proficiency simplifies this often convoluted process consequently assisting you retrieve all losses rightfully owed.

Investing trust into a law firm is an important decision; outsource that worry to us at Carlson Bier where delivering unmatched services goes hand in hand with fostering client relationships sanctified upon respect and integrity benchmarks. Don’t let uncertainty over reimbursements unabatedly plague you anymore now that you’re knowledgeable enough making informed decisions.

To actualize newfound insights productively into concrete remedial steps inviting respite from inflicted trauma’s aftermaths, take the first decisive move toward resolution today by clicking the button below. Discover the monetary value encompassed within your unique circumstances as discreetly assessed by our expert team promising elevated services tantamount to optimized client contentment. Together, let’s explore how we can best represent your interests and secure the deserved compensation you are entitled to.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For North Center Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in North Center

Areas of Practice in North Center

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Supplying professional legal support for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Delivering expert legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Neglect

Supporting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Tumble Incidents

Expert in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking justice for their damages.

Newborn Harms

Delivering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Dedicated to helping sufferers of car accidents gain reasonable settlement for harms and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in providing legal support for victims involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Providing expert legal advice for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for harms.

Worksite Collisions

Concentrated on assisting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Impairments

Committed to delivering compassionate legal assistance for individuals suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in addressing cases for victims who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Undeserved Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and professional legal services to ensure redress.

Neural Trauma

Specializing in defending patients with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer