...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Dupo

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In need of a competent Medical Malpractice attorney in Dupo? Look no further than Carlson Bier. We’re recognized across Illinois for our relentless pursuit of justice and unwavering commitment to safeguarding patient rights. Our experienced team concentrates solely on personal injury law with particular expertise in medical malpractice cases. With an impressive record of successful legal battles settled favorably, we assure you that your case is in capable hands with Carlson Bier advocates fighting for your cause. Navigating the complexities of medical malpractice issues can be draining and unnerving – you don’t have to go through it alone! Allow us to shoulder the burden as we journey together towards justice. As well-versed experts, we promise innovative litigation strategies coupled with staunch negotiation tactics aimed at achieving satisfactory outcomes for every client. Entrust your legal concerns to the professionals at Carlson Bier – let’s fight for what’s rightfully yours! Choose astuteness; choose efficiency; most importantly, choose outstanding representation guaranteed only by us Carlson-Bier Attorneys at Law.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Dupo Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted ally in the complex legal world of personal injury law. Based in Illinois, we are a team of dedicated attorneys who specialize in resolving cases related to medical malpractice. The realm of medical malpractice constitutes multiple avenues; understanding its intricacies can provide significant insights into getting the justice one rightfully deserves.

Medical malpractice occurs when a health care provider deviates from the accepted standard of care in treating a patient, leading to harm or injury. It’s not always obvious when such events occur — often they remain hidden behind complicated medical terminologies and opaque procedures.

Key fundamental points worth noting about Medical Malpractice include:

• Not every negative outcome from treatment necessarily implies malpractice was involved. These situations need to be considered on a case-by-case basis.

• One crucial element required to establish evidence for a med-mal case is the expert testimony that highlights negligence from the healthcare practitioner.

• To successfully litigate these claims, patients must prove that their physician violated his/her duty of care and further, this breach resulted in an injury that led to specific damages – physical pain, mental anguish or additional medical bills.

At Carlson Bier, we firmly believe knowledge is your best defense against any unjust situation and delve deep into each case providing you with robust representation fortified through thorough research and detailed planning.

Pursuing cases relating to med-mal can turn out overwhelming as it requires dissecting extensive information and pivoting through labyrinths of complex laws which may not be apparent to those outside the domain. Therefore, having dependable legal assistance like ours at hand would ensure navigation through less treacherous terrain while assuring higher chances of justifiable remuneration.

Major considerations while seeking help for Medical Malpractice victim generally include:

• Swiftly taking action as there is usually a limited time within which you can file your lawsuit known as ‘the statute of limitations.’

• Collecting robust documentation detailing everything – right from the moment you suspect malpractice to each subsequent event after it.

• Searching for a law firm, like Carlson Bier, that has carved out a niche specifically in handling cases related to medical malpractice.

We, at Carlson Bier, strive persistently to bring value to our clients by appropriating apt legal strategies and leave no stone unturned for your rightful justice.

With top-notch legal acumen made accessible in Illinois, we understand the emotional turbulence one can undergo when dealing with negligent health care aftermaths. As your dependable courthouse champions, we build powerful cases based on detailed investigation and reliable expert testimony tailored around your unique circumstances leading towards maximum compensation.

Navigating healthcare negligence on your own can be challenging. What most victims need is an outstanding advocate who not only comprehends their predicament but also stands up fearlessly against even formidable opponents. Thus partnering with us would mean having access to such deft meticulousness coupled with seasoned expertise all streamlined towards simplifying this complex process for you.

When seeking justice for personal injury through potential medical malpractice case, do consider our high-value consultation service. Just click the button below and let our team work toward evaluating what your case could be worth. You’ve been through enough already – let us take it from here; ensuring justice is done while keeping the entire process as straightforward as possible for you should only serve you right! After all – you rightfully deserve nothing less than being equitably compensated when harm has come upon owing to someone else’s negligence.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dupo Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Dupo

Areas of Practice in Dupo

Cycling Incidents

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying professional legal support for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Misconduct

Providing experienced legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, supplying professional legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Neglect

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Slip Incidents

Professional in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking recovery for their damages.

Neonatal Damages

Providing legal assistance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Collisions

Accidents: Dedicated to aiding patients of car accidents get fair settlement for injuries and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Committed to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

18-Wheeler Incident

Ensuring professional legal support for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Dedicated to representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Head Impairments

Dedicated to ensuring dedicated legal advice for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Wounds

Skilled in managing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from canine attacks or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and expert legal services to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Damage

Focused on defending individuals with spine impairments, offering professional legal guidance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer