...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Johnston City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking justice for medical malpractice in Johnston City, turn to Carlson Bier – a stellar law firm that excels with excellent personal injury lawyers. We have an esteemed history of securing favorable outcomes for clients who suffer from professional negligence in the medical industry. Our unique combination of thorough knowledge, diverse experience, and unwavering commitment positions us as your ideal legal ally. Advancing intricate cases requires specialized skills and extensive understanding; exactly what our expert attorneys provide. At Carlson Bier, every case receives unparalleled attention while we impeccably navigate Illinois’s complex laws on medical malpractice. Each attorney at our firm is dedicated to ensuring that victims receive just compensation while holding accountable those responsible for their pain and suffering. Though you might be overwhelmed dealing with this harrowing ordeal alone, you don’t have to; remember – it takes a competent team like ours at Carlson Bier to effectively fight these battles successfully against formidable adversaries in Illinois courts! Choose us – choose peace amidst chaotic circumstances!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Johnston City Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in advocating for victims of medical malpractice. As a distinguished personal injury law firm based out of Illinois, our foremost commitment is to ensure that those who have suffered harm or injury due to medical negligence receive the justice they deserve. Medical malpractice is a complex and intricate area of law which demands extensive knowledge and specialized expertise.

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider deviates from the accepted standards of practices in health care or fails to fulfill their duties through acts of negligence, leading to patient harm or injury. This deviation can take many forms such as surgical errors, wrong medication prescription, birth injuries, or failure to diagnose critical issues timely.

• Surgical Errors: Instances where unsettling mistakes happen during surgery such as wrong-site surgery or operation on incorrect patient.

• Wrong Prescription Issuance: Occurrences wherein drugs contraindicated to patients are given either by misdiagnosis or sheer gross incompetence.

• Birth Injuries: When negligent prenatal care or unsafe delivery procedures result in irreversible damage to newborns

• Misdiagnosis/ Delayed Diagnosis: Scenarios where care providers fail to identify life-threatening conditions/expensive treatment protocols thereby causing undue patient suffering.

Navigating this complicated field of personal injury requires nuanced understanding and legal acumen. At Carlson Bier, our experienced attorneys possess profound insight into the labyrinthian world of medical malpractice litigation. We vigilantly work with clients every step along their journey towards securing validation for their grievances in the form of rightful compensation.

As clients’ advocates, Carlson Bier’s primary objective is not only enforcing liability but also ensuring diligent examination into all channels possible for damage recovery. It encompasses everything—from past and future excessive medical bills caused due to negligence-resulting injuries; physical pain indeed but emotional distress too; earnings lost owing inability fostering post-injury gainful employment including depreciation regarding potential growth opportunities and more.

Our unwavering tenacity coupled with intense dedication routinely helps clients achieve successful case resolutions. We feel enormously privileged to be trusted Sherpas, guiding victims through their arduous journeys of rectification against medical malpractice.

At Carlson Bier, we believe it’s important to provide value beyond just superior legal representation. Our intent is also about fostering an educational platform for everyone—legal jargon translated into everyday vernacular, making complex information accessible and digestible. With this focus on transparency and client-centered communications at the core of our ethos, we are proud to work relentlessly towards demystifying individual rights during instances involving potential medical negligence.

We take pride in ensuring every client feels heard, respected, and supported throughout every stage of what can oftentimes be a tough process. To help bolster confidence in engaging with us as your advocate and representative, our commitment is upheld even financially—we operate on a contingent fee agreement basis! Meaning: You pay absolutely no fees unless we win your claim!

Discovering whether you have grounds for a medical malpractice claim can often feel overwhelming. The amount any given case might yield remains dependent upon many variables – from severity/persistence of the injury caused due to negligence; demonstrated incompetence/misconduct by responsible health care provider(s); relevant insurance policy details involved; even local jurisdictional lawsuit caps regarding total damage recovery allowed per case.

Are you ready to reclaim your life after falling prey to negligent medical practice? Click on the button below right now! Establish how much scope there may exist for claiming monetary compensation—the first step towards re-establishing semblance post traumatic upheaval caused by medically-induced malfeasance…all with just one click below. Connect with us at Carlson Bier today and start navigating your path towards justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Johnston City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Johnston City

Areas of Practice in Johnston City

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Flame Burns

Offering expert legal advice for people of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or recklessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing expert legal support for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Managing cases involving faulty products, delivering specialist legal support to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble and Trip Incidents

Expert in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Traumas

Offering legal help for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Committed to assisting patients of car accidents gain reasonable recompense for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Focused on providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Ensuring experienced legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Head Traumas

Dedicated to providing dedicated legal assistance for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Traumas

Adept at dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Demise

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure fairness.

Backbone Impairment

Dedicated to representing patients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​