...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Keithsburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking legal redress for medical malpractice, having high-quality representation is essential. Carlson Bier has set a high standard in the realm of personal injury law and especially with cases involving medical malpractice throughout Illinois. With a deep well of understanding about healthcare standards and regulations coupled with their extensive litigation experience, they are particularly suited to represent your interests meticulously. They empathize with victims who may be suffering from physical pain or emotional distress due to negligent health practices, offering compassionate yet assertive legal support. What sets them apart is their enduring commitment to ensuring that justice is served where it matters most. Their expertise becomes instrumental when investigating complex healthcare scenarios and interpreting sophisticated medical data unearths vital evidence for your case. With Carlson Bier as your guardians in the arena of Healthcare Law, you can expect thorough professional counsel marked by integrity, detailed attention and surefooted strategic planning; setting you on course towards securing a fitting resolution for your troublesome predicament.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Keithsburg Illinois

When it comes to navigating the complexities of medical malpractice, Carlson Bier – a leading personal injury law firm in Illinois is undeniably your best ally. Our specialized team of attorneys has an unshakeable commitment to seeking justice for victims of medical negligence. These incidents are not just unfortunate accidents; they can result in devastating health outcomes and colossal financial burdens that could last a lifetime.

To start off with, let’s get clear on what constitutes Medical Malpractice. It occurs when a healthcare provider deviates from agreed-upon standards in their field, and this divergence leads directly to patient harm or suffering. This includes misdiagnosis, failure to diagnose, surgical errors, improper medication administration or dosages, neglecting patient history and neglectful practice among myriad other examples.

Medical Malpractice is rooted in negligence – but showing negligence is often not straightforward. A successful case gravitates around four key elements: duty, breach of duty, causation and damages incurred as a result:

• Duty – This implies that there was an existing relationship between the doctor involved and the victim.

• Breach of Duty – It can be challenging to establish whether there was indeed deviation from standard care practices without expert input.

• Causation- Law demands concrete proof linking the doctor’s negligent act or omission directly to your injuries.

• Damages – Actual harm must have occurred due to this negligence for legal action justified.

Though daunting at face value these cases become manageable processes when you bring Carlson Bier’s professional expertise into play.

We believe that one injured party represents more than just a case number; it signifies a life tossed into turmoil through no fault of their own. Our personal Injury lawyers fight tirelessly against large hospital corporations and insurance companies by wielding empathy as our strength rather than viewing clients as mere transactional entities.

In our experience we’ve noticed prospective clients harbor some common misconceptions about medical malpractice lawsuits:

• Unfavorable Outcome doesn’t equate to Medical Malpractice – Not all unfortunate medical outcomes are a result of negligence.

• No out-of-pocket cost – Many people shy away from these suits fearing exorbitant legal fees. Carlson Bier operates on a contingency basis, which means we only take our percentage when you win your case.

• Limited Timeframe – Illinois law stipulates a time limit (statute of limitations) for bringing forth these claims. It’s typically two years post-discovery of said cause of action.

Carlson Bier is well-positioned to be your guide and representative in this challenging journey towards justice. We have an acute understanding of the protocols involved, insurance company tactics and how best to navigate an often-rigged system.

Our personal injury attorneys work meticulously from discovery right through litigation process collecting evidence, interviewing witnesses and working alongside medical experts who can attest whether standards were compromised leading up to the injury. Through our assertive negotiation skills, we remain devoted to obtaining the maximum compensation available under law for each client’s specific circumstances.

In retrospect, dealing with medical malpractice cases requires more than simply acquiring legal service; it needs comprehensive assistance that addresses your pain points while helping you stay financially afloat amidst mounting expenses as your lawsuit transpires. And that precisely represents what the Carlson Bier experience entails: relational approach fused with results-oriented strategies.

As you ponder over these critical insights related to Medical Malpractice Lawsuits in Illinois, consider taking advantage of our expertise today! Don’t let fear or uncertainty delay rightful justice attainable under proper guidance. Navigate below & click the button to find out just how much your case could potentially be worth. Let us assist you in standing strong against inequity while retrieving deserved restitution at the outset! At Carlson Bier, fighting for you isn’t simply our duty—it’s our privilege!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Keithsburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Keithsburg

Areas of Practice in Keithsburg

Bicycle Crashes

Specializing in legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing adept legal services for people of major burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Offering dedicated legal services for victims affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal help to customers affected by harmful products.

Senior Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Slip Occurrences

Professional in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Childbirth Traumas

Supplying legal assistance for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Incidents: Committed to helping clients of car accidents obtain reasonable payout for hurts and losses.

Bike Collisions

Focused on providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Trucking Collision

Offering experienced legal representation for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Focused on representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Harms

Dedicated to delivering specialized legal services for persons suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Damages

Specialized in handling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and professional legal guidance to ensure redress.

Vertebral Harm

Committed to representing individuals with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​