...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Taylor Springs

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a motorcycle accident, you need an ally who understands your situation and can adeptly navigate the convoluted world of law. Consider Carlson Bier – a reputable Illinois-based personal injury lawyer group noted for their prowess in handling motorcycle accident cases. With years of dedicated experience and intricate knowledge of state laws, our unparalleled legal services are aimed at delivering just compensation that mirrors your physical ordeal as well as emotional trauma. Whether it’s negotiating with insurance companies or presenting assertive arguments in court, our professionals are committed to helping you restitute life back to normalcy. Should the magnitudes catastrophically escalate involving fatalities or severe harm; we have proven aptitude assisting you through wrongful death suits or heavy corporal damages claims respectively against careless parties involved directly or indirectly.

Trustworthy legal representation from Carlson Bier orchestrates a profound commitment giving unique attention to each case, which sets us apart both regionally and beyond Illinois borders. In dealing specifically with motorcycle accidents within Taylor Springs jurisdiction area – we strive earnestly safeguarding your rights and interests promptly without compromise on quality while striving towards best possible results for our esteemed clients.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Taylor Springs Illinois

As advocates for injured victims, the Carlson Bier law firm, a reputable personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, is dedicated to championing your rights following a Motorcycle Accident. We understand that this type of accident can be traumatic and often leads to severe physical injuries, emotional distress, financial burdens and more. Our mission revolves around ensuring you receive the compensation you rightly deserve while alleviating as much stress from your life during this trying time.

Motorcycle accidents differ from other motor vehicle accidents through their catastrophic potential due to the exposed position of the rider. Substantial medical costs often follow these incidents – including initial emergency room visits, surgery, rehabilitation therapies or long-term care fees where necessary. Additionally, there are significant non-economic damages such as pain and suffering which need careful articulation when seeking settlement.

• An essential factor with motorcycle accidents is that fault determination may not always be clear-cut. Many times these cases involve complex issues of negligence and require comprehensive expertise to navigate successfully.

• In-depth knowledge of local Illinois laws and regulations relating to motorcycles is crucial for constructing compelling legal arguments.

• Seeking appropriate compensation takes into account not only present day losses but also future earnings ability impacted by serious injury or disability arising out of such an accident.

At Carlson Bier we deploy diligent investigation techniques supplemented with cutting-edge technology to ensure every pertinent detail supports our client’s case. This includes reviewing police reports, revisiting crash scenes for additional evidence collection through video footage or eyewitness testimonials where possible – anything that will robustly back up your claim.

Another critical service area lies in negotiation: insurance companies typically seek quick resolution following minor incidents but might resist fair settlement in case of high-cost damages due to major injuries or fatalities involved in motorcycle accidents. Navigating delicate insurer conversations demands seasoned expertise – something we’ve honed over years at Carlson Bier.

We can appreciate your hesitations about mounting legal bills alongside hospital expenses; that’s why Carlson Bier operates on a contingency fee basis. This implies that our payment is contingent upon successful outcome of your case; in other words, we only get paid when you do.

Whether it’s handling litigation matters against large insurance corporations, seeking compensation from guilty parties or mediating between medical care providers on outstanding bills – Carlson Bier Law Firm stands committed to securing justice for motorbike accident victims. Remember, not all law firms are created equal: our nuanced understanding and experience with motorcycle accident cases set us apart.

Recognising every case holds unique circumstances which warrant individual attention – engaging a specialized personal injury attorney like Carlson Bier presents as an informed decision for the injured party or his/her loved ones following a traumatic incident such as a motorcycle accident.

We’re here ready to listen sympathetically, respond empathetically but act forcefully to secure your rightful redressal. While no amount of monetary compensation can truly make up for physical pain, psychological trauma or loss experienced due to such events – we remain steadfastly focused on delivering legal solutions aimed at putting clients back into pre-incident state at the earliest possible moment.

Surmounting this stressful period may feel daunting just now but remember you don’t have to face these overwhelming challenges alone. If you’re dealing with aftermath of a Motorcycle Accident and find yourself pondering over “what next?” – take charge by arming yourself with comprehensive legal aid from accomplished Illinois attorneys at Carlson Bier firm today.

Intrigued and wish to explore further? Curious about potential worth of your claim? We invite you to click the button below right away & let’s start working towards turning things around for you!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Taylor Springs Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Taylor Springs

Areas of Practice in Taylor Springs

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Scald Injuries

Giving skilled legal help for sufferers of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Physician Carelessness

Offering professional legal advice for victims affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Obligation

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, offering expert legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Mistreatment

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Fall Mishaps

Expert in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking compensation for their suffering.

Newborn Wounds

Supplying legal help for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents gain reasonable settlement for wounds and damages.

Scooter Incidents

Specializing in providing representation for bikers involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring professional legal assistance for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for losses.

Building Site Mishaps

Focused on supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cognitive Injuries

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal services for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at addressing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and experienced legal support to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Impairment

Dedicated to representing patients with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal representation to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​