FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Assumption

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When tragedy strikes in a motorcycle accident, it’s only fitting that victims demand the best advocacy available. Carlson Bier, an Illinois-based personal injury law firm with considerable experience in managing Motorcycle Accident cases, stands as an optimal consideration. At Carlson Bier, we understand the severe implications of such accidents and work relentlessly to secure fair compensation for our clients. We don’t just assert claims; we build strong cases backed by thorough investigations and expert testimonials relevant to Assumption’s circumstances.

Our seasoned attorneys specialize in handling complex negotiations with insurance companies — drawing from comprehensive knowledge of local traffic laws and regulations to construct untouchable arguments against any liable parties involved.

Motorcycle riders face unique risks on roads which result in distinct injuries demanding specialized legal expertise—An epitomic match for the daring grit typical of us at Carlson Bier. Beyond our proficiency is our commitment towards every single client – a promise underscored by transparency, empathy, and determination; making every effort count till victory is secured. Make no assumptions—the best choice for your Motorcycle Accident Attorney needs surely remains Carlson Bier Law Firm.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Assumption Illinois

As a trusted source of legal support in Illinois, Carlson Bier is universally acknowledged for its proficient representation in the realm of personal injury law. Our reputation originates from our dedicated emphasis on championing the rights and interests of victims who have suffered injuries due to someone else’s negligence – with particular specialization in Motorcycle accidents.

Motorcycle accidents indeed represent some of the most devastating collisions that one can experience on the road given their inherent lack of protection compared to other motor vehicles. The resulting damages can be both physically and emotionally catastrophic, ranging from debilitating injuries to extensive financial burdens placed upon the victim. Sadly, these types of incidents are alarmingly frequent; countless motorcyclists fall prey to such misfortunes every year, thereby necessitating the need for skilled legal representation.

At Carlson Bier, our experienced attorneys understand all the complexities tied to motorcycle accident cases. We bring into account various factors like:

– Determining fault: Establishing who was at fault correctly is crucial especially when multiple parties are involved.

– Unfolding evidence: Our team will meticulously gather necessary proof such as police reports, CCTV footage, eyewitness accounts, or medical records ensuring no detail goes unnoticed.

– Navigating through insurance claims: Often dealing with claims adjusters can be confusing and overwhelming; hence our firm assists you in negotiating just compensation.

As attorneys specializing in personal injury law with a focus on motorcycle accidents, we aim to clarify your understanding about your rights under Illinois law. It is important for each client to comprehend that they have the right to seek full compensation for damages sustained including medical bills, rehabilitation costs, lost wages due to inability to work plus emotional trauma among others.

Moreover, at Carlson Bier we believe that compassion lies at the heart of efficient representation – it’s not just about winning cases but also affirming humanity within the legal process by acknowledging each client’s individual needs and fears. This sensibility fosters trust amid uncertainty while paving way to a just resolution.

Making the decision to obtain legal representation in the wake of a motorcycle accident is not one that should be postponed. Time plays an integral role due to statutes of limitations and preserving vital evidence essential for your case. Precautionary measures like seeking immediate medical attention regardless of how minor you perceive your injuries, reporting the accident promptly according to Illinois laws, avoiding statements or signing any document before consulting with a lawyer are crucial steps towards securing maximum compensation.

Partnering with Carlson Bier isn’t just about procuring adept legal help; it’s also about empowering each client through awareness, support, and action – arming them with knowledge throughout every step so they feel confident about their path ahead toward healing and justice.

You deserve more than just mediocre legal guidance after enduring such traumatic experiences. That’s why we at Carlson Bier stand ready in making compelling arguments on your behalf promoting protection and enforcing accountability from those at fault based on meticulous analysis and research pertaining to all aspects of your case.

The staunch commitment displayed by our team at Carlson Bier coupled with strategic lawyering aimed towards achieving best possible results has resulted in substantial settlements for past clients who underwent similar situations as yours. We strongly believe that you too can benefit significantly from this level of expertise.

Curious what potential recovery awaits you? We encourage you click below. Discover what might be achievable for your case – allowing us reassurance that ultimately safeguards personal peace amidst adversity while tirelessly advocating for fair recompense stemming from the unfortunate incident that you’ve unfortunately found yourself entangled within.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Assumption Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Assumption

Areas of Practice in Assumption

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Giving expert legal help for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal advice for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving faulty products, extending specialist legal support to individuals affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Slip Injuries

Adept in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal support for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Incidents: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents get fair recompense for wounds and impairment.

Motorcycle Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Truck Incident

Delivering adept legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for losses.

Construction Incidents

Focused on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Brain Harms

Dedicated to extending dedicated legal services for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Injuries

Skilled in tackling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Focused on supporting individuals with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​