...

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in La Harpe

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you have been in a motorcycle accident in La Harpe, Illinois, engaging the services of Carlson Bier is your most effective course of action. Renowned for their prowess and tenacity, the competent team at Carlson Bier specializes exclusively in personal injury law with an emphasis on motorcycle accidents. As a proud recipient of numerous industry accolades for client dedication and legal excellence, this proficient attorney group has mastered the complexities inherent in unraveling intricate accident cases. Uncertain road conditions or negligent behavior can lead to devastating consequences on two wheels; it’s imperative to choose lawyers who understand each nuance deeply. With relentless pursuit of truth and justice fueled by empathy for what their clients endure during these trying times, they leave no stone unturned. Their decisive grasp over localized laws boosts legitimate claims while contesting inadequate compensations vehemently presented by insurance companies or defendants’ counsels alike! Trust none but the capable hands at Carlson Bier where each case is handled with utmost integrity: your optimal solution when seeking comprehensive motorcycle accident representation.

About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in La Harpe Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we promise attentive, individualized service to each and every one of our clients. With abundant experience in personal injury law, particularly in the niche area of motorcycle accidents, our goal is to help you understand your rights and navigate the complexities surrounding such accidents in Illinois. To further strengthen your understanding, we present key points about motorcycle accidents.

Motorcycles are not just a mode of transport; they represent freedom, passion, and joy for many riders. However, these same enthusiasts often end up being victims of catastrophic collisions due to various reasons like negligent driving or hazardous road conditions. When such situations arise where innocent motorcyclists get involved in heartrending accidents through no fault of their own – it’s time for justice to reign.

Riding motorcycles come with certain inherent risks – primarily because bikers are exposed without the protection offered by traditional vehicles’ bodywork.

• Motorcycles lack stability as compared to a four-wheeler which increases chances for accident

• There can be blind spots for other drivers leading them to overlook a bike on the road

• Road irregularities can lead to sudden crash

Furthermore, injuries from motorcycle accidents tend to be more severe than those from car crashes, given that they have less physical barriers against forces during an accident.

Another crucial aspect when dealing with motorcycle injustices is grasping the complexity encompassed by Illinois Motorcycle Accident laws. These laws cover vast ground: equipment standards maintaining insurance coverage, traffic regulations specific to motorcycles – all intertwined within case-specific dynamics.

The intricacies can sometimes feel overwhelming but understanding how these laws work is crucial when seeking rightful compensation post-accident. In fact:

• The ‘at-fault driver pays’ principle forms cornerstone here under tort law

• A claim should generally be made within 2 years following accident occurrence

• Partially at-fault parties too could potentially receive damage awards based on proportionality

Navigating legal waters during a distressing time could be daunting. This is where the expertise of Carlson Bier comes into play. Each accident claim showcases unique circumstances requiring customized attention therein.

Beyond supporting your legal journey, we also offer guidance in dealing with medical expenses, repair or replacement costs, wages lost due to an inability to work and more – essentially covering all possible domains influenced by your accident.

Experience doesn’t always imply longevity; it crucially encompasses diversity as well. Our team brings together attorneys whose specialties span numerous facets allowing us to provide comprehensive assistance throughout each leg of your claim process.

Every case is different and holds varying degrees of compensation potential based on specifics surrounding your motorcycle accident. If you have suffered from injuries caused by a motorcycle incident through no fault of your own, let’s navigate this challenging battle for justice together.

Ultimately, our commitment lies in not just getting what you deserve but also ensuring an understanding and compassionate environment at every step because at Carlson Bier – You Matter!

Fueled by deep-rooted passion and comprehensive knowledge base about personal injury law, we are here to shoulder responsibility while dealing with the aftermaths of such grim incidents. Explore more about how we can assist in bringing light even amidst seemingly helpless situations following dire accidents.

Below awaits a user-friendly interface that provides immediate insights regarding compensatory possibilities tied specifically to your case details within Illinois Landscape.

Remember, accidents don’t wait – neither should justice! So go ahead click on the button below and find out how much value there lies waiting within our grasp moving forward post-accident. Together we triumph! Here’s to truth prevailing!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For La Harpe Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in La Harpe

Areas of Practice in La Harpe

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Providing skilled legal services for individuals of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Hospital Malpractice

Providing dedicated legal representation for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Obligation

Handling cases involving dangerous products, providing skilled legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Misconduct

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Tumble Accidents

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Newborn Damages

Supplying legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on assisting sufferers of car accidents secure fair compensation for hurts and harm.

Bike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Accident

Offering adept legal assistance for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for harms.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in extending dedicated legal support for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Skilled in tackling cases for persons who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Loss

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Dedicated to advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering dedicated legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer