...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Spaulding

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When involved in a pedestrian accident, the aftermath can be overwhelming. Appointing an expert attorney could make all the difference and Carlson Bier is just that. Renowned for their profound experience in pedestrian accidents, they offer unmatched representation across Illinois. Why should Spaulding residents entrust them? Firstly, their comprehensive knowledge of state laws pertaining to these cases afford clients an unrivaled strategic advantage during litigation or arbitration processes.Secondly, their empathetic approach assures every client feels heard; your concerns are theirs too. Their diligent commitment delivers appropriate compensation – relieving financial burdens linked to medical expenses or loss of work etc., thus helping you concentrate on recuperation.Finally, defecting from impersonal ‘big firm’ tactics- your case will never just be another number at Carlson Bier.Rather than focusing purely on high caseload turnover,CB’s sophisticated legal team remain dedicated toward standards of quality over quantity.Remember: In times when every detail matters to secure your claim’s outcome ,opt for experts who prioritize YOU.Carlson Bier,the leading name in Pedestrian Accident law expertise—because you deserve nothing less!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Spaulding Illinois

Carlson Bier, your trusted personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, is here to provide you with comprehensive information on Pedestrian Accidents. We understand the daunting task victims and their families face while trying to navigate law terminology, insurance policies, and court procedures. That’s why we’ve dedicated this space to educate you about Pedestrian Accidents.

Firstly, what constitutes a pedestrian accident? Simply put, these are unfortunate incidents that happen when a person walking or running on foot gets struck by a vehicle– it could be cars, bikes, motorcycles or even lorries.. The impact can lead to catastrophic repercussions including severe injuries or worse fatalities. Unsurprisingly then, pedestrians are deemed amongst the most vulnerable groups of road users due to a lack of protective equipment compared to those inside vehicles.

There are various extents of harm from mild cuts and bruises up until life-altering injuries like broken bones and spinal cord damage. More than half of pedestrian accidents result from driver negligence which includes factors like distracted driving; failure to yield at crosswalks; speeding; disobeying traffic signs & signals; alcohol-impaired driving; aggressive or negligent behavior among others.

Keep note: under Illinois state law,

• A motorist has duty of care towards pedestrians that mandates them not hurting anyone intentionally nor acting with reckless disregard for the safety of others.

• Additionally if violating any traffic laws results in harming a pedestrian – the driver becomes presumptively negligent or liable.

• Also it might surprise some but pedestrians too have responsibilities – they must obey traffic signals and walk on marked paths where available.

• If both parties (driver & victim) share blame for causing an accident– then Comparative Negligence rule applies where compensation amount will get reduced in proportion with the victim’s fault degree.

We cannot stress enough how vital is hiring expert legal representation after such mishap. Armed with extensive experience plus intimate knowledge covering all aspects linked with Pedestrian Accidents, Carlson Bier is committed to fighting for you. We work diligently analyzing individual cases; collecting evidence; negotiating with insurers and if need be take matters to court – all so that our clients can secure maximum possible compensation.

Moreover, we operate on the principle of contingency fees meaning if no recovery then you pay us nothing. Our track record demonstrates a history of successful case settlements through which victims have acquired reimbursement covering myriad costs such as medical treatment; physical therapy & rehabilitation; loss of earnings from inability to work or diminished future earning capacity; emotional trauma; plus damages for pain and suffering experienced.

At Carlson Bier, we believe in keeping our clientele informed not just about their legal rights but also current affairs. For instance latest Illinois Department of Transportation statistics divulge an alarming upward trend in pedestrian accidents notably within urban areas. This underscores the necessity for continuous advocacy towards pedestrian’s safety legislation improvements.

Navigating aftermath implications of Pedestrian Accident can be overwhelming indeed thus it is paramount choosing right legal representation during this challenging time period. Remember each case features unique factors – hence consulting knowledgeable attorneys who thoroughly comprehend these variables ensures better opportunity receiving fullest monetary relief.

In summing up, being involved in a pedestrian accident throws the victim and their loved ones into a slew of confusing legalities, financial constraints, alongside dealing with severe health repercussions which may last lifelong. Amidst such turmoil bear one thing mind – that at Illinois’s own Carlson Bier – our sole aim remains: FIGHTING FOR YOU!

Don’t hesitate further! Click the button below now and find out how much your case could potentially be worth because every second counts when it comes to justice making its way!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Spaulding Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Spaulding

Areas of Practice in Spaulding

Bicycle Mishaps

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Burn Damages

Giving specialist legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Physician Malpractice

Ensuring specialist legal services for clients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering expert legal assistance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Stumble Incidents

Skilled in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking restitution for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Supplying legal aid for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting victims of car accidents get just settlement for harms and losses.

Motorbike Mishaps

Committed to providing legal advice for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Extending specialist legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for damages.

Construction Accidents

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Focused on delivering expert legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at tackling cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Dedicated to legal support for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Passing

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and skilled legal support to ensure redress.

Vertebral Harm

Committed to assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​