...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Mendota

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a pedestrian accident, what you need most is support and expert advice. The attorneys at Carlson Bier are masters in their field, dedicated to offering just that for the residents of Mendota. Every case is unique and there’s no substitution for distinctive experience. As personal injury specialists, we understand intimately the intricate elements of Illinois’ pedestrian laws and have an impressive record handling complex cases successfully. Choosing Carlson Bier as your representation assures focused attention on your case-detailed investigation for essential evidence, expert analysis of medical records; all aimed towards ensuring maximum compensation possible under law. We’re passionate about safeguarding your rights while providing compassionate assistance throughout this trying period—beyond legal counsel—we offer unwavering emotional support too. Our commitment doesn’t stop until justice has been achieved because every client matters at Carlson Bier. Your worries become our mission to resolve—which makes us not only excellent advocates but trusted allies too—in navigating through traumatic times efficiently and confidently.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Mendota Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that pedestrian accidents can happen at any time and can alter a victim’s life dramatically. We are an Illinois-based personal injury law firm committed to providing the advocacy you need when such unfortunate events transgress. Pedestrian accidents often result in severe injuries, leading to costly medical bills, lost wages due to an inability to work, emotional distress, and even potential disability. Navigating this complex process alone can be burdensome with all these factors looming overhead.

Recovering from a pedestrian accident is not only about physical recuperation but also defending your right as an injured party deserving of fair compensation for all losses incurred. At Carlson Bier, our expertise extends beyond just understanding personal injury law provisions; we offer comprehensive legal guidance that accommodates each unique situation holistically.

• Understanding Responsibility: Clarifying fault in pedestrian accidents often involves evaluating multiple traffic laws and intricate details of the event. For instance, drivers should yield to pedestrians at unmarked crosswalks according to Illinois law.

• Determining The Value Of Your Case – The most critical stages towards securing ample reimbursement involve determining damages accurately based on financial circumstances (including estimated future expenses), physical injuries severity level, and effect on the quality of life post-accident evidenced by psychological reports.

• Negotiating With Insurance Companies: Insurance agents typically aim for minimum pay-outs possible which inhibits meeting optimum medical care costs or amply compensating pain caused. Our team is well-experienced in adept negotiation tactics with insurance companies promoting client interests above all.

Undoubtedly, Illinois pedestrian laws intricacy necessitate having competent lawyers like us who are distinctly familiar with local regulations working tirelessly on your behalf throughout each demanding stage of filing claims. Vice versa implies running into potentially chilling challenges related to claim denial or inadequate settlement offers – situations where expert legal advice ensures deserved justice and full entitlement realization stand inviolate.

While mainstream thinking channels blame mostly towards reckless drivers in motorist-pedestrian collisions, circumstances occasionally arise where motorists aren’t entirely at fault. This argues for meticulous details analysis and proper evidence presentation within courts clearing our clients from undue blame or facilitating fair judgement.

Above all else, though the intense aftermath of pedestrian accidents cannot be understated in terms of how quickly mounting pressure sets upon victims to deal with medical exigencies, tight legal deadlines whereby timely action is critical factor puts another level of urgency on victims. Carlson Bier continues lifting such burdens off our clients by ensuring professional and compassionate assistance allowing them respite to focus on recovery while we seek out every possibility for maximum compensation that their cases merit.

We treat each client’s case individually as an imperative engagement aligning our experience, expertise bundled up with dedication into securing optimal outcomes during settlements or trials. If you or a loved one has been involved in a pedestrian accident and require skilled lawyers well-grounded about Illinois personal injury laws intricacies, consider this your opportunity to enhance your chances towards fair justice realization significantly.

At Carlson Bier, we encourage open dialogues right from initial consultations through entire process duration intending to foster collaborative relationships ensuring we stay constantly updated with evolving needs warranting appropriate legal proceedings initiations promptly tailored for unique situations benefit.

Click on the button below now to start journeying along righteousness path towards rightful compensation amount determination – times like these necessitate expert guiding hands which assures deserved justice levels arrival promptly rather than being left astray, overwhelmed or unfairly compensated. It’s high time you discover exactly how much your case is worth without further delay!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mendota Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Mendota

Areas of Practice in Mendota

Bicycle Crashes

Expert in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Scald Wounds

Supplying adept legal services for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering experienced legal advice for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Liability

Managing cases involving dangerous products, delivering skilled legal assistance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Senior Abuse

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Trip & Trip Occurrences

Adept in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking redress for their losses.

Childbirth Injuries

Supplying legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Crashes: Focused on assisting individuals of car accidents obtain equitable recompense for hurts and losses.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Providing experienced legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for injuries.

Building Site Crashes

Concentrated on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Brain Damages

Focused on offering dedicated legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Specializing in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unjust Death

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal support to ensure justice.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to defending clients with paralysis, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​