...

Pedestrian Accident Attorney in Virden

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

As a team of highly skilled and passionate legal practitioners, Carlson Bier offers incomparable personal representation for pedestrian accident victims. Our commitment revolves around ensuring that you receive full compensation for your suffering. We recognize the physical, emotional, and financial hardship associated with pedestrian accidents; our utmost pursuit is to alleviate this burden through our meticulous legal services. With years of experience navigating delicate situations relating to Illinois’ pedestrian law intricacies, we are astutely informed about protecting your rights in Virden and beyond. Whether you have suffered minor injuries or ones with more life-altering consequences, know that Carlson Bier stands ready to help restore fairness for disruptions caused by others’ negligence. We meticulously investigate every element surrounding the incident while compassionately supporting our clients during this challenging time—a combination honed from countless similar representations throughout Illinois like those encountered in Virden’s community—reflects why trusting us at Carlson Bier as your Pedestrian Accident Lawyer can be one impactful decision on your road towards recovery.

About Carlson Bier

Pedestrian Accident Lawyers in Virden Illinois

Carlson Bier is a distinguished personal injury law firm based in Illinois, dedicated to representing victims of pedestrian accidents. We work fervently to obtain compensation for your medical bills, lost wages, and suffering brought on by the negligence of others. Pedestrian accidents often result in severe injuries or fatalities due to the minimal protection pedestrians have against a moving vehicle – leading to devastating physical, emotional and financial tolls.

When it comes to understanding pedestrian accidents, there are a few critical factors one must be aware of:

• Duty of care: Every driver has an inherent responsibility or duty of care towards others on the road, including pedestrians. Drivers should always pay attention and yield appropriately to ensure pedestrian safety.

• Negligence: Was the driver negligent? Were they speeding, intoxicated or did they fail to stop at crosswalks?

• Injuries suffered: A small detail can make a significant difference when presenting your case; Carlson Bier leaves no stone unturned while gathering evidence about injuries sustained during the accident.

• Compensation: There is possible compensation not only for your physical ailments but also for any emotional distress and psychological harm endured.

Being involved in a pedestrian accident could be overwhelming – dealing with insurers whilst nursing injuries might seem like an insurmountable task – this is where Carlson Bier steps in as efficient advocates.

We believe that every client’s case deserves careful examination and personalized handling; whether it’s dialoguing with insurance companies regarding claims or working relentlessly till justice prevails in court – our aim is keeping you duly compensated for your loss. Our litigation expertise married with an empathetic approach sets us apart from other personal injury attorneys.

Please remember that time can be essence after such unfortunate incidents; swift action assists significantly when collating indispensable proof related matters like drive responsibility and resultant repercussions – all crucial facets when building robust legal cases.

At Carlson Bier, we understand that these instances bear more than just monetary damages but also mental trauma and rehabilitation concerns. We’re here to navigate you through this intricate legal world with utmost care and competence.

Over the years, we have successfully helped several clients reclaim not only their peace but also substantial reward for their trials; our vast knowledge and experience make us a pivotal aid during these challenging times.

What sets Carlson Bier apart is our unequivocal dedication to your cause. You are more than just another client. Each case is personalized according to specific situations and needs while ensuring advocacy that defends your rights, shoulder responsibilities, soothe anxieties and guide towards restitution.

Your accident doesn’t define you – it’s an unfortunate occurrence which should lead to justice served. It does not matter whether it was a run off-the-mill situation like negligent driving or reckless endangerment caused by improper roadway design – we assure relentless pursuit till deserved victory is achieved.

Unsure about the worth of your case? Don’t be. Click on the button below right now! Our professional counsel will assess the specifics of your pedestrian accident scenario, giving you clarity on possible compensation amounts due to you under Illinois law.

Remember – at Carlson Bier, all cases are handled without charging upfront legal fees until YOU win – it’s a manifestation of our unwavering commitment towards helping victims of pedestrian accidents seek justice rightfully owed them. Whether negotiating complicated settlements or fighting dogged courtroom battles – we don’t back down because your deserved compensation matters deeply to us!

With Carlson Bier advocating by your side, step confidently towards holding those responsible for the harm done accountable – expedite justice today so healing can truly begin tomorrow.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Virden Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Virden

Areas of Practice in Virden

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Traumas

Giving expert legal assistance for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Hospital Carelessness

Extending expert legal advice for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending professional legal services to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Stumble Accidents

Specialist in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking redress for their harm.

Newborn Wounds

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Crashes

Incidents: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents receive reasonable remuneration for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Expert in providing legal assistance for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for damages.

Semi Mishap

Delivering adept legal representation for persons involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for losses.

Worksite Crashes

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Dedicated to delivering compassionate legal representation for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered harms from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and skilled legal representation to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Focused on representing victims with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer