...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Schiller Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to choosing the right legal representation for Slip and Fall Accidents in Schiller Park, look no further than Carlson Bier. They are a premier personal injury law firm with a proven track record of success for clients facing this specific type of circumstance. Their extensive knowledge in Illinois law is coupled with their unparalleled commitment to delivering expert advice and comprehensive support throughout your claim’s progression. No accident case is too complex or challenging; they leverage their specialists’ insight into the intricate dynamics that underpin each incident, ensuring every possible avenue towards reclaiming damages is pursued thoroughly. Choosing Carlson Bier means selecting tenacity, competence, and reassurance as they ardently advocate on your client’s behalf against any negligent parties involved in your slip-and-fall mishap. What truly differentiates them from others? It’s their dedicated approach empowering victims by transforming distressful situations into opportunities for justice served – testament to why they embody an optimal choice when navigating such sensitive events around slip-and-fall accidents within Schiller Park.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Schiller Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we represent individuals who have been injured in slip and fall accidents. Our personal injury attorneys bring extensive legal expertise in Illinois laws regarding such incidents, guiding victims through the complicated process of pursuing their rightful compensation. Slip and fall accidents can occur unexpectedly due to various circumstances – poorly maintained premises, wet floors without warning signs, uneven sidewalks or torn carpeting are all potential hazards that can lead to serious injuries.

Here are important aspects related to Slip and Fall Accidents:

• It is crucial to understand that not every slip, trip, or fall will result in an actionable personal injury claim; it’s often dependent on whether there was negligence involved.

• Establishing liability involves proving that someone (individual/enterprise) failed to act responsibly or ‘reasonably.’

• An experienced slip and fall attorney can help determine who may be legally at fault for your accident – it could be a property owner/occupier/managers etc.

• In some cases, Illinois law also considers whether the injured person bears any responsibility for what happened. This rule known as ‘comparative negligence,’ might affect the amount of compensation you receive.

When faced with a devastating event like this one, securing empathetic and dedicated representation from our distinguished litigation attorneys significantly maximizes the chances of securing rightful justice. Recoverable damages after a slip-and-fall accident typically encompass medical bills, lost earnings capacity/days missed from work because of the injury (past & future), physical pain & suffering/emotional distress, disability/disfigurement amongst others. More so if your loved one has tragically lost life in slipping/falling accidents on someone else’s premise under suspect situations – we hold negligent entities accountable by filing wrongful death claims.

Carlson Bier brings unmatched dedication when representing clients struggling after traumatic events – curating personalized legal strategies tailored towards specified individual needs/goals considering key details including types/severity of sustained injuries & predicted longevity impacts while adhering strictly to Illinois statutory laws, judicial precedence & case facts. It’s worth noting that evidence preservation promptly post-incident enhances the strength of your claim – things like accident site photographs/surveillance videos or witness statements could play pivotal roles in proving liability.

Through absolute compassion & rigorous advocacy, we help recover optimal monetary settlements for clients following slip-fall accidents – decided either via negotiations with fault party insurance providers or jury trials verdicts if matters escalate into courthouse litigations due to settlement disagreements.

Rest assured, Carlson Bier personal injury lawyers are duty-bound by the legal tenet ‘No Win-No Fee’ principle – essentially implying you owe us absolutely nothing until we successfully recover compensation on your behalf. We pride ourselves on maintaining exceptional service standards across every client interaction phase—right from initial consultations through case closures/settlements/verdict implementations.

We fervently believe our coveted reputation throughout Illinois isn’t merely a reflection of successful case outcomes—it’s equally about ensuring each connate client steps onto their path towards healing while breathing simpler on being able to meet financial obligations/security confidently arising from an unfortunate incident outside their control.

Thank you for considering Carlson Bier’s personal injury attorneys as your trusted partners during this challenging time. To explore more about these services and understand how much your unique case stands worth under prevailing legal context/terms, kindly click the button below. Our seasoned attorney team awaits engaging with you personally to plot a roadmap for rightful justice which fosters long-term peace of mind amidst difficult circumstances.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Schiller Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Schiller Park

Areas of Practice in Schiller Park

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Fire Burns

Giving expert legal assistance for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or carelessness.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing dedicated legal advice for clients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Responsibility

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, offering expert legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Elder Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall & Tumble Occurrences

Professional in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Neonatal Injuries

Offering legal support for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on helping individuals of car accidents receive reasonable payout for wounds and damages.

Motorbike Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal services for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Providing specialist legal support for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for damages.

Building Site Accidents

Committed to assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Neurological Damages

Dedicated to providing professional legal advice for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to incidents.

Dog Bite Wounds

Proficient in handling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Focused on legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Unjust Loss

Advocating for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Injury

Committed to supporting individuals with spine impairments, offering specialized legal services to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​