Slip And Fall Accidents Attorney in Mitchell

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When it comes to expertly navigating the legal encounters synonymous with slip and fall accidents, Carlson Bier stands prominent amongst personal injury lawyer firms. Tackling these complex cases at their core, our firm has established a significant record in restoring justice for many victims grappling with the aftermath of such unfortunate incidents. Utilizing resilient skill sets and extensive knowledge fortified by years of experience, we skillfully manoeuvre through lawsuits tied to various locations throughout Illinois including Mitchell. Recognizing no two situations are alike – each bringing distinct circumstances and potential repercussions – ours is not a template approach but rather specified understanding on every case basis. We comprehend that your peace of mind as you rightfully seek compensation is invaluable; therefore, our dedicated team assiduously works towards ensuring an optimal outcome in your favor meticulously handling all the unique dynamics applicable to slip and fall accident laws within Illinois terrain. Choosing Carlson Bier denotes selecting utmost proficiency moulded by seasoned practice across multiple scenarios spanning diverse localities.

About Carlson Bier

Slip And Fall Accidents Lawyers in Mitchell Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a group of dedicated personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, with keen expertise and unparallel representation in the field of Slip and Fall Accidents. Our law firm firmly believes that everyone deserves comprehensive legal notions concerning the severe impacts of such accidents on an individual’s health and lifestyle, as well as implications they have legally.

There prevail numerous instances where negligence or unsafe conditions can lead to slip-and-fall accidents, causing grave physical harm. In situations like these, victims often fail to recognize their rightful entitlements surrounding personal injury claims due to the lack of concise legal guidance.

What intricacies lie behind these types of accidents? These events typically revolve around instances where properties are kept negligently without proper supervision or habitual maintenance – leading to hazardous scenarios for innocent civilians who confront significant injuries subsequently.

Notable causes include but not limited to:

– Wet or slippery floors.

– Uneven surfaces or broken pavement.

– Poorly lit areas.

– Missing handrails on a stairway.

– Cluttered walkways amongst others.

Our extensive legal experience at Carlson Bier asserts that each slip-and-fall case carries unique characteristics—making it essential for every victim to understand their fundamental rights assured by Illinois state laws before moving forward with respective proceedings. The dominant points enclosed under this law establish unambiguous grounds wherein property owners hold responsibility for subsequent damages caused by their disregard towards safety measures—if proven correctly through sufficient evidence backing up the factual accuracy of accidental circumstances.

To elucidate:

1) Property Owners’ Responsibility: If it is established that said accident resulted from an owner’s obliviousness towards maintaining regulated safety protocols—the violated party stands viable for seeking legitimate compensation against their dropped responsibilities.

2) Existence of ‘Dangerous Conditions’: Another integral condition envelopes establishing ‘dangerous conditions’ existing either temporarily or permanently within premises—that solely contribute towards inciting unfortunate incidents under this category.

3) Victim’s Behavior: The State Laws of Illinois also underpin the role of victim’s behavior during such accidents. If it is proved that the accident happened due to careless or reckless actions on part of the injured individual—the legitimacy for their claim stands potentially threatened.

While this knowledge can bring substantial clarity concerning your entitled legal rights—grasping upon threads of rightful compensation can be a tedious process. This is where Carlson Bier steps up—with personalized expertise and targeted approach—we are here to assist you in each step, making sure you procure maximum compensation deserved rightfully against endured distress.

Navigating through these complex waters often demands steadfast perseverance backed by solid professional support—an imperative achieved proficiently at our law firm. Prioritizing claimant’s individual requirements and case-based sensitivity, we structure a strong representation focused solely upon comprehending intricate norms surrounding slip-and-fall incidents—followed by tenacious negotiations with relevant parties aimed towards securing best possible settlement.

Always remember, your action today will define the course for your wellness tomorrow—a principle that remains staunchly held by every personal injury attorney at Carlson Bier.

Therefore, if you or someone close encountered any unfortunate circumstances related to Slip And Fall Accidents-don’t hesitate any further. Unlock your access to expert representation today—because when it comes down to safeguarding your rights, every single moment counts generously!

For better understanding about appropriateness qualifying your circumstances under established laws—or derive profound insights about claim feasibility based on specific concerns; feel free to explore below how much it possibly summates for compensable value within Illinois jurisdiction—and allow us an opportunity worth seizing—let’s etch together a brighter future ahead ensuring justice—isn’t delayed!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mitchell Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Slip & Fall Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of slip and fall accidents in Chicago include:

  • Wet or slippery floors: This could include spills, leaks, and snow and ice.
  • Uneven surfaces: This could include potholes, cracks in the pavement, and loose floorboards.
  • Poor lighting: This could make it difficult to see hazards on the ground.
  • Obstructions: This could include cords, boxes, and other objects that are in the way.

If you have a slip and fall accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to the property owner or manager. This will create a record of the accident and help you build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Contact a slip and fall accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a slip and fall accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the property owner or manager if you believe they were negligent in maintaining the property.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a slip and fall accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.

Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for slip and fall accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Mitchell

Areas of Practice in Mitchell

Cycling Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or perilous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Providing adept legal services for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Physician Negligence

Providing dedicated legal assistance for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Obligation

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, supplying specialist legal services to consumers affected by defective items.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Stumble Incidents

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking redress for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal aid for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Incidents

Accidents: Dedicated to assisting clients of car accidents get equitable remuneration for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Crashes

Committed to providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Truck Crash

Delivering experienced legal advice for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Committed to representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cognitive Harms

Focused on extending specialized legal assistance for persons suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in tackling cases for persons who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unfair Death

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and skilled legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spine Damage

Specializing in supporting individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer