...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Peru

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a spinal cord injury, securing the best possible legal representation becomes your utmost priority. Carlson Bier steps up to this crucial role, presenting an unwavering commitment to safeguarding the rights and interests of victims. This Illinois-based law firm has firmly established itself as a front-runner in matters related to Spinal Cord Injuries lawsuits due to their extensive experience and proven track record. The attorneys at Carlson Bier are well-versed in every nuance of complex tort laws that concern Spinal Cord Injuries cases. They focus on helping clients get justice by ensuring they receive full compensation for medical expenses, loss of income, pain and suffering among others. The team works relentlessly-studying case laws, staying updated about advancements in medical treatments for spinal injuries-and constructing robust strategies customized to unique client needs without losing sight of compassion or empathy during these challenging times.

With their sterling reputation across Illinois,you can trust Carlson Bier with judicial complications following traumatic spinal injuries: your strength through turbulent legal battles – Your voice when it’s needed most!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Peru Illinois

Carlson Bier is a renowned personal injury law firm based in Illinois, specializing in dealing with spinal cord injuries. As experts within the field, we understand that any form of spinal injury can lead to profound life changes; promoting recovery and ensuring that victims receive compensation are our priorities. Spinal cord injuries often result from accidents such as vehicular collisions or falls; however, they may also be due to violence and diseases.

The severity could range from mild symptoms to severe paralysis depending on the level of injury along the spine. Cervical injuries typically cause quadriplegia (paralysis below the neck), thoracic injures often lead to paraplegia (impairment in motor or sensory function of the lower extremities), while lumbar and sacral spine damages usually affect nerve and muscle control in hips, thighs, buttocks, and legs.

Understanding these terminologies related to your spinal cord damage will help you comprehend your situation better:

• Quadriplegia: Paralysis below neck.

• Paraplegia: Impairment affecting lower extremities.

• Lumbar & Sacral Injuries: Damage influencing control over hips, thighs, buttocks & legs.

At Carlson Bier Associates LLC., our pool of experienced attorneys will guide you through each step involved in securing compensation for these debilitating injuries occurring due to someone else’s negligence. We ensure thorough understanding about treatment options ranging from acute treatment aimed at minimizing effects post-injury through potential surgery to rehabilitation involving physical or occupational therapy designed towards improving quality of life post-recovery.

Also vitally crucial is understanding how costs associated with spinal cord injuries can skyrocket considering medical bills, ongoing care costs and lost income during convalescence period. What’s more devastating are non-economic factors such as pain & suffering which duly weighs into estimation of rightful compensation amount entitled by deserving claimants recovering majorly after traumatic experiences.

Therefore key pointers for every victim fighting for deserved compensation would include:

• Immediate legal counsel: Skilled attorneys can make a marked difference in achieving desired outcome.

• Detailed documentation: Describing accident scene, circumstances leading to injury and depicting losses incurred is vital.

• Expert consultation: Medical experts collaborate to provide accurate estimates for future care needs & damages.

As Carlson Bier Associates LLC., we pledge our dedication towards upholding your rights passionately while battling rigorously with insurance companies trying to minimize claimant payouts using various ploys. We unravel these tactics effectively utilizing experience acquired over years championing client causes successfully in courtrooms across Illinois.

Our commitment towards providing comprehensive and easily understood educational material about spinal cord injuries demonstrates our dedication to bringing value to you beyond the courtroom setting as well. It’s not merely about winning cases, but also bearing testament to Carlson Bier’s repute for going above and beyond call of duty ensuring clients are served with utmost standard of excellence throughout their ordeal recovering from impact of detrimental accidents threatening one’s way of life permanently most times.

We invite you to take the next important step towards securing your rightful compensation – click on the button below for an estimate regarding your potential case worth considering several impactful factors besides incurred medical bills which insurance companies might overlook deliberately attempting misrepresentation unjustly during settlements discussion rounds.”

The path towards recovery can be daunting and challenging; however, rest assured knowing that with us at Carlson Bier by your side, you never have to confront this uphill battle alone ever again! Together let’s journey along the road forging ahead steadfast on mission restoring justice rightly merited by two principles: Passionately pursued compassion alongside uncompromising advocacy – Cornerstones anchoring foundation at Carlson Bier firmly rooted in a legacy spanning several decades serving resilient Illinois residents courageously coping under such distressing instances powerfully threatening altering life rhythm unexpectedly contrary normal expectations otherwise.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Peru Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Peru

Areas of Practice in Peru

Bike Incidents

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Offering specialist legal assistance for patients of major burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Physician Malpractice

Extending dedicated legal representation for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Merchandise Liability

Managing cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Malpractice

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble & Stumble Mishaps

Adept in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal support for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Mishaps: Concentrated on helping clients of car accidents receive reasonable payout for injuries and harm.

Scooter Mishaps

Committed to providing representation for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing professional legal advice for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Dedicated to advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Brain Injuries

Focused on delivering compassionate legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and expert legal representation to ensure justice.

Backbone Injury

Committed to assisting clients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer