...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Hutsonville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, our specialized proficiency in handling Spinal Cord Injuries cases sets us apart. Over the decades serving Illinois, we have staunchly represented victims of such debilitating injuries; advocating for their rights and ensuring they secure the just compensation they rightfully deserve. We understand that these life-altering circumstances create profound challenges for the injured and their families which extend well beyond physical pain; emotional distress and financial burdens pervade veritably every aspect of daily lives. Our commitment at Carlson Bier is to provide meticulous legal representation coupled with compassionate support during these testing times. Drawing on valuable years of experience and a deep understanding of relevant legislations, we ensure thorough preparation for each case meticulously strategizing towards successful outcomes . Furthermore, our dedicated team relentlessly pursues justice against negligent parties whose actions or inactions precipitated grave harm onto innocent lives. Bestowing your trust in Carlson Bier indeed translates to partnering with leading legal expertise committed to standing by you throughout your spinal cord injury litigation journey.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Hutsonville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are well-versed with the complexities and long-term impacts of spinal cord injuries on victims. Our expertise in personal injury law coupled with an unyielding commitment to securing just compensation for our clients helped us set a benchmark in Illinois. Understanding the rudiments of spinal cord injury serves as crucial first step towards filing a lawsuit and fighting for justice.

Spinal Cord Injuries often stem from severe physical trauma, resulting in bruised, crushed, or severed nerve fibers that impede communication between the brain and other body parts. These may range from paralysis such as Paraplegia – affecting lower limbs, Tetraplegia – affecting all four limbs and core body functions; or less damaging Neurological Impairments leading to loss of sensitivity or movement below the affected area.

It is essential to grasp:

• The type of Spinal Cord Injury incurred – Complete (total lack of sensory function below level of injury) or Incomplete (some functioning remains)

• Primary vs Secondary Injuries: While primary injuries materialize immediately at impact, secondary injuries arise over time due to inflammation response.

• Associated Medical Complications: Digestive issues, Chronic pain syndromes, Neurogenic Bladder/Bowel Distress among others need accounting when seeking compensation.

• Psychological Trauma & Rehabilitation: Depression & Anxiety disorders often accompany these injuries necessitating comprehensive psychological care alongside physical therapy.

Pursuing legal remedy for Spinal Cord Injury involves careful understanding and assessment not only of above factors but also exploring avenues of compensating “injury” costs – medical bills incurred initially and those already accrued during rehabilitation stage; ongoing/future medical expenses; emotional distress charges; physical suffering recompense along with lost wages due compensation.

Navigating through these crossroads alone can be daunting so team up with seasoned professionals like Carlson Bier who strive relentlessly to secure fair damages commensurate to physical suffering borne by our clients. As personal injury law attorneys versed in Spinal Injuries, we know well the need to empathize with victim’s plight and work round-the-clock to build a bulletproof case while helping alleviate their physical, emotional, and financial burdens.

We realize that no settlement can fully compensate for loss of mobility, functionality or fulfilling lifestyle. However our dedication to your cause helps ease some of the accompanying stressors by diligently investigating accident site, interviewing witnesses; analyzing medical records; consulting domain experts – since proving liability without a shadow of doubt is key for successful verdict. Our client-first approach coupled with result-oriented representational skills makes us a trusted partner during these challenging times.

Our commitment remains steadfast towards ensuring justice is uncovered on behalf of Acute Injury victims and survivors. Allow us at Carlson Bier to shoulder your legal concerns so you can focus on healing. Remember Illinois’s statutes of limitation and don’t let time slip away from enforcing your legal rights as delay might risk weakening the validity of your claim.

For insight into potential compensation you could be entitled based on variables unique to each case like incident severity, contributing factors – negligence vs deliberate harm etc., press the button below. This will not only provide an avenue to evaluate your spinal injury case but also affords an understanding of possible claims at hand helping defining efficient legal strategy geared keeping best interests at heart.

With Carlson Bier guiding through every phase involved in litigating personal injuries – together we stand strong against responsible individuals/entities harnessing swift justice due our clients continually striving towards restoring normality within affected lives underlined by victim empowerment and lowered anguish surrounding unfortunate life-altering events.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Hutsonville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Hutsonville

Areas of Practice in Hutsonville

Bicycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Wounds

Extending professional legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Healthcare Carelessness

Providing professional legal services for victims affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, offering specialist legal help to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Malpractice

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble & Stumble Injuries

Skilled in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Wounds

Supplying legal support for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Car Collisions

Incidents: Focused on supporting clients of car accidents get reasonable settlement for damages and losses.

Motorcycle Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for injuries.

18-Wheeler Collision

Delivering expert legal services for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cognitive Damages

Specializing in providing specialized legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Wounds

Skilled in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Death

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Impairment

Committed to assisting individuals with backbone trauma, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​