...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Shawneetown

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the debilitating aftermath of a spinal cord injury, securing legal representation from experienced professionals is paramount. Carlson Bier demonstrates an unparalleled dedication to assisting clients ravishingly affected by spinal cord injuries. Our tailored litigation approach, devised by seasoned attorneys, ensures each client’s unique situation is meticulously evaluated and attended to achieve maximum compensation. As staunch advocates for victims burdened by the long-term implications associated with spinal cord accidents in Illinois, we possess vast knowledge encompassing medical nuances and intricacies pertaining to legal processes crucial for favorable outcomes. At Carlson Bier, we display our unwavering commitment through fervent advocacy and relentless pursuit of justice – standing as a potent symbol of resilience in times of adversity. Often heralded as optimal consideration when necessitated to liaise with insurance companies or opposing lawyers within Illinois borders–especially around Shawneetown–our steadfast resolution marks us amongst the foremost experts in handling cases related to severe neurological damage like Spinal Cord Injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Shawneetown Illinois

At the esteemed Carlson Bier law firm, we understand that navigating through the aftermath of a spinal cord injury can be arduous. Deemed as one of the most serious and life-altering injuries, these cases are tremendously complex to comprehend and litigate, often necessitating an experienced personal injury attorney specialized in such intricacies. Our Illinois-based team at Carlson Bier is fastidious in helping individuals who have suffered spinal cord injuries due to negligence or misuse by others.

Spinal cord injuries typically result from sudden damage that incurs when vertebrae, ligaments, or disks of the spinal column are bruised or compressed – leading to dire consequences for victims. Some fundamental symptoms resulting from this type of injury include impaired strength and sensation below the point of harm alongside persistent pain or discomfort. Outlining some key distresses associated with spinal cord injuries aids in precise prognosis:

– Loss or reduced mobility

– Inability to control bladder or bowel movements

– Limited range of motion

– Difficulty breathing

– Spasms

– Chronic pain

The extent of impact that a spinal cord accident can bear amply justifies obtaining affluent legal support to ascertain fair compensation. At Carlson Bier, our proficient lawyers strive diligently towards advocating for your rights while providing premium guidance throughout intricate litigation procedures associated with these types of cases.

Navigating medical bills, negotiating with insurance companies and understanding potential long-term care costs can be overwhelming alone; let alone dealing with emotional trauma after sustaining a spinal cord injury. Our seasoned attorneys possess years of sophisticated experience dealing with these matters. They work proactively on each case they undertake – equipping strategies tailored adequately according to specific needs underlined by individual circumstance complexities.

Inherently immense complexity surrounding spinal cord injury lawsuits stems from attempting to figure out what future medical costs might accumulate over time owing to evolving complications which may arise concomitantly during recovery process. Reiteratively stressing importance embodied by engaging professional legal help translates into nativity embedded in our legal practice, as we endeavor to deliver justice at its absolute best; providing victims rightful compensation they deserve.

Carlson Bier lawyers pride themselves on their ability to fight for your rights with integrity. We work doggedly towards ensuring the responsible party is held accountable and that you, the victim, receive full compensation for your emotional pain, lost wages and medical bills resulting from the incident. Our personalized attention to each case reflects our strong belief that every client deserves high-quality service underpinned by respect and understanding.

Involving a skilled team like Carlson Bier early on in the process tends to yield more effective results. Experts for such cases provide assistance not solely through adept representation throughout court proceedings but also serve as formidable advocates during interacting with insurance companies. Our attorneys are well-adept with local Illinois laws regarding spinal cord injuries – positioning us perfectly to garner best possible outcome advantageous for the victims involved.

Reflect upon this invaluable resource reserved at your disposal – right here within Illinois state limits where Carlson Bier reside ready to assist. We invite you now to take a decisive action towards reclaiming control over your life after enduring a spinal cord injury-caused predicament. Click on the button below, let’s find out together just what prerogative standing does your claim hold in procuring compensatory relief you truly deserve.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Shawneetown Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Shawneetown

Areas of Practice in Shawneetown

Cycling Mishaps

Proficient in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving expert legal support for patients of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Medical Malpractice

Providing experienced legal assistance for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Fault

Handling cases involving dangerous products, providing adept legal guidance to customers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Tumble Injuries

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking restitution for their losses.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Crashes

Mishaps: Committed to assisting clients of car accidents receive fair recompense for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Collisions

Focused on providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Truck Collision

Delivering specialist legal advice for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for injuries.

Worksite Incidents

Concentrated on defending staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to providing professional legal support for persons suffering from brain injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered damages from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering compensation.

Unfair Death

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and professional legal support to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Injury

Expert in assisting victims with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​