...

Personal Injury Attorney in South Roxana

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a personal injury can alter your world in an instant, making the legal assistance of Carlson Bier indispensable. We understand that what you need most at such challenging times is an advocate who will tirelessly champion your claims for compensation. As a revered personal injury law firm serving South Roxana, our seasoned team of attorneys plies their extensive experience to fight for justice and fair recompense on behalf of our clients.

We recognize each case as unique, offering personalized strategies tailored to provide the optimum response to every client’s needs. Our meticulous attention-to-detail has yielded notable successes against formidable opposition from insurance companies or other corporations.

At Carlson Bier, we boast specialists skilled in various facets of personal injury law: from auto accidents to worker’s compensation claims. This range allows us unparalleled ability in navigating through complex laws and stipulations involved in different cases within Illinois jurisdictional confines.

Selecting Carlson Bier means opting for compassionate service coupled with relentless determination when fighting injustices related to personal injuries. Our commitment extends beyond achieving financial resolutions; we strive fervently towards restoring normalcy into disrupted lives—the true testament/decoration proving outstanding eminence among forces operating Personal Injury law services near South Roxana.

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in South Roxana Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we fully grasp the importance of legal needs associated with personal injuries and firmly believe that victims have a right to just and fair compensation. As premier injury attorneys in Illinois, we strive for justice by diligently pursuing your deserved recompense.

In-depth knowledge is power when it comes to understanding personal injury law. At its core, this area centers around accidents caused by others’ negligence or intentional behavior. This can take various forms such as car crashes, workplace mishaps, medical malpractice, or slip-and-fall incidents among many others. If you suffer physical harm or psychological trauma due to someone’s carelessness or harmful intent, they are legally accountable under the vast umbrella of Personal Injury Law.

While deciphering legalese may seem daunting at first glance, our responsibility at Carlson Bier extends beyond representation; it encompasses educating our clients about their rights within personal injury cases. Thusly meticulously curated bullet points below outline critical aspects:

– Negligence: In personal injury lingo denotes imprudence leading to an accident.

– Liability: Establishing fault is pivotal in securing damages.

– Damages: It refers to monetary compensation victims receive.

– Statute of Limitations: Timing remains crucial as there’s a limited period within which one must file a claim.

Remember that every case has unique circumstances thus necessitating tailored approaches ensuring maximum viability and results.

Our caring team delivers exemplary service using stellar negotiation skills leveraging their extensive experience in processing local Illinois claims—with a technical know-how that shines light on all shadowy provisions underpinning Illinois’ complex regulations. Our objective is singular – to guarantee humane empathy while navigating sensitive matters coupled with robust legal proficiency converts into substantial compensations you wholly deserve.

Moreover at Carlson Bier we do not shy away from taking cases to trial if negotiations don’t meet your expectations thereby reassuring our unwavering commitment towards securing superlative outcomes nourishing renewed peace-of-mind for you.

While personal injury cases often involve meticulous detail, patience and exactitude, our mastery of the field allows us to shoulder this load off you allowing for an environment conducive to your recovery. We understand the importance of comprehensive examinations into each exigency linked with your incident.

At Carlson Bier, we’re aware that encumbrance inflicted by legal costs mounts additional stressors on victims already grappling with pain & suffering. That’s why our firm operates on a contingency basis – meaning our service charge arises only when we win your case. This contributes to our holistic dedication towards facilitating the easiest possible road to recuperation post-incident; physically, emotionally and financially.

Being informed is valuable but availing proficient local legal expertise crucially multiplies worth in personal injury contexts alike. Each intricate intersection within law maze enhances inherent complexities thereby mandating seasoned navigators like ourselves at Carlson Beir implementing strategic maneuvers optimizing rightful compensation benefits garnered exclusively for you.

In confiding with us; you’re not just forging a lawyer-client relationship but actually initiating a rehabilitation journey where justice triumphs via full monetary recognition translating your affliction into advantages meant wholly for you.

Our invitation now extends towards an opportunity exploring how much potentially can be recouped against suffered damages—a click waiting eagerly beneath to unveil the merits underlying your claim unveiling its financial potentiality anchored reliably under Carlson Bier’s exemplary guidance—the best Personal Injury Attorney Group rooted carefully within Illinois’ healthy soils of judicial fairness beckoning through friendly advisors ready assuming responsibilities transforming your lives positively in aftermaths otherwise generally gloomy without their presence.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For South Roxana Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in South Roxana

Areas of Practice in South Roxana

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing adept legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Responsibility

Managing cases involving defective products, supplying expert legal guidance to victims affected by defective items.

Geriatric Malpractice

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Tumble and Trip Accidents

Skilled in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking redress for their harm.

Infant Wounds

Offering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Collisions: Devoted to supporting patients of car accidents secure just recompense for injuries and impairment.

Motorbike Mishaps

Expert in providing legal services for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

18-Wheeler Accident

Offering adept legal advice for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for hurts.

Building Site Crashes

Concentrated on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Head Damages

Focused on extending expert legal advice for patients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Damages

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unfair Death

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Injury

Specializing in defending victims with vertebral damage, offering expert legal assistance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer