...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Bartonville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or someone you love has suffered from a dog bite injury in Bartonville, let the professionals at Carlson Bier Attorneys-at-Law handle your case. With vast comprehension of Illinois personal injury law and extensive experience with dog bite incidents, our team is equipped to aggressively advocate for you. Our legal experts are action-oriented and devoted to securing full compensation for clients’ suffering caused by irresponsible pet owners. Severity of injuries resulting from such unfortunate run-ins can range from superficial wounds to severe groaning damages requiring costly medical treatment. At Carlson Bier, we understand this devastating emotional pain attached with physical trauma; hence our objective remains ensuring your healing isn’t hindered due to financial burden created by medical bills or lost wages following the tragic event. Proudly serving victims in numerous communities including Bartonville – even if it’s not a city where our offices reside – demonstrates how extensively committed we are towards justice not being bound by geographical constraints.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Bartonville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our commitment is to serve you as trusted personal injury attorneys who specialize in an array of claims including dog bite injuries. We understand the complexities and legal precedents tied to cases concerning aggressive animal encounters. Integral to our service delivery is providing a wealth of information for readers seeking insight into this distinctive area of law – Dog Bite Injuries.

Dog bite injuries can be devastating incidents that result in both physical and emotional trauma. It is reported that every year close to almost 4.5 million Americans are bitten by dogs with 20% of these cases necessitating medical attention, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention statistics. The resulting damages may include but not limited to disfigurement, nerve damage, infections like rabies, psychological harm such as PTSD, for which victims are entitled to seek compensation.

However much there might be a prevailing stereotype about certain breeds being more inclined towards aggression than others, it’s imperative to note that Illinois Law makes no breed-based distinctions. The statute insists on holding all dog owners responsible if their pet causes injury when unprovoked. Our seasoned group of lawyers at Carlson Bier comprehend these provisions within the Animal Control Act and have the tools needed to build and maintain a cogent case on your behalf.

• Comprehensive investigation – From gathering witnesses’ testimonies or reports from animal control officers down to investigating past behavior patterns; each detail is meticulously compiled.

• Medical documentation – Our team ensures proper documentation ties medical ailments directly to the incident in question.

• Psychological analysis – The mental implications following such traumatic experiences often need long-term support; our team is primed for this pursuit too.

Successfully resolving litigation related scenarios doesn’t occur overnight; rigorous preparation becomes mandatory here. One crucial point we emphasize strongly: actionable instances aren’t always straightforward assault situations alone; actual physical contact isn’t requisite under Illinois state law requirement; occurrence where inducing fear led victim(s) getting hurt while running off can also make dog owners liable.

A key thing to remember is that an initial consultation with Carlson Bier does not place you under any obligations. It’s a complimentary session designed for us to comprehend your situation while explaining the potential legal strategies applicable to your case. And should we enter into representation, it’s pertinent to recall that we operate on a contingency fee basis – Meaning you ought not worry over upfront fees and are billed only after successfully recovering compensation on your behalf.

While this article provides information about Dog Bite Injuries in Illinois, each circumstance varies greatly based on its unique characteristics making generalized deductions unfeasible. Your particular case may have nuanced aspects influencing whether or how much compensatory damages would be pursued. Hence expert advice becomes integral for victims seeking justice against reckless pet owners in the aftermath of traumatic dog bite incidents.

Our job at Carlson Bier hinges on equipping our clients with insight for them to make informed decisions regarding their cases whilst ensuring they receive rightful compensation for sustained injuries; as also accountability from culpable parties involved.

Wouldn’t you like to explore the prospect of substantial payable compensation more concretely related specifically to your case? Act by clicking the button below right now! Allow our proficient personal injury attorneys to provide an estimation how much your claim could be worth even considering varying contributory factors typical of settlements relating dog bite injuries within Illinois jurisdiction.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Bartonville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Bartonville

Areas of Practice in Bartonville

Bicycle Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving adept legal support for patients of serious burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Malpractice

Offering dedicated legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving faulty products, extending professional legal support to victims affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Slip Mishaps

Adept in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Harms

Providing legal assistance for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Incidents

Collisions: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents obtain just recompense for injuries and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Mishap

Delivering adept legal advice for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Focused on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Specializing in extending dedicated legal assistance for patients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Damages

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Fatality

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and adept legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Neural Trauma

Committed to assisting victims with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​