Construction Site Accident Attorney in Blue Mound

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When experiencing a construction site accident in Blue Mound, it becomes invaluable to have the experienced and supportive team of Carlson Bier at your service. Our accomplished attorneys are experts in Illinois personal injury law, specializing most notably in Construction Site Accidents. Each case is treated with unwavering dedication as our claimants’ rights and interests remain central throughout proceedings. Our vast knowledge equips us with the skills required for dealing with complex legal issues involving employer negligence and machine malfunctions that commonly arise within these cases. We aim to procure maximum compensation while ensuring client peace of mind during such strenuous circumstances through consistent communication and transparency regarding their case’s progress. Furthermore, we make certain that every action complies strictly with all relevant Illinois laws, reassuring our potential clients of our authenticity and credibility as a leading personal injury attorney group by maintaining an ethical practice above all else. Trust nothing less than complete commitment from Carlson Bier when seeking rightful justice after encountering a construction site accident around Blue Mound.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Blue Mound Illinois

The realm of personal injury law is vast, and encompasses a wide variety of scenarios and situations. At Carlson Bier, we prioritize championing for the rights of individuals who have suffered from accidents occurring at construction sites. As a prominent law firm based in Illinois, we recognize that construction industries represent one of the highest incidents of workplace accidents. These accidents can often lead to severe injuries or unfortunate fatalities that might require extensive medical care or even result in loss of livelihoods.

Within this complex arena of personal injury law, it’s crucial to understand specific aspects related to Construction Site Accidents:

• One key aspect revolves around a term called ‘duty of care.’ Every employer on a construction site holds the responsibility or duty to ensure safety measures are in place.

• Multiple parties could divert blame for negligence causing an accident. Often times these include employers, contractors, sub-contractors, architects and equipment manufacturers among others.

• Trained legal expertise becomes essential since Illinois follows ‘Modified Comparative Negligence.’ This doctrine implies if you’re found 51% or more responsible for your own accident; you may not be able to claim damages.

• Worker’s compensation only covers certain aspects after an accident. Therefore, additional claims against third parties liable might increase recovery scope.

Our team at Carlson Bier brings decades-long combined experience handling such intricate circumstances concerning personal injury cases originating from Construction Site Accidents. We tirelessly work towards understanding every particular case detail while exploring all potential avenues so as to secure maximum possible compensation on behalf of our clients.

Understanding the importance & outcome value potentially associated with timely legal representation becomes pivotal especially when dealing with insurance companies post-accident; they frequently try limiting their financial responsibilities towards injured victims. Our attorneys at Carlson Bier do not spare efforts until justice is meted out righteously by holding accountable all liable parties involved.

While every individual case is unique with different intricacies pertaining mainly due to varying project types or parties involved, we at Carlson Bier consistently strive delivering efficient legal service extending way beyond just fulfilling statutory requirements related to disclosure, inspection & sharing of vital information during a claim’s process.

We comprehend the gravity involved when someone’s wellbeing is stake as a result from Construction Site Accidents. That’s why we strongly suggest understanding your rights before signing any quick settlement offers presented by insurance companies. Remember, equitable compensation does not merely entail reimbursing medical expenses incurred but also takes into account losses intangible in nature including pain and suffering amongst other damages that could be possibly claimed.

The quality services provided by our elite team of personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier ensure that clients are kept fully informed throughout claims’ proceedings while achieving best possible results & maintaining utmost professionalism.

For comprehensive expertise related to intricate legal aspects concerning Construction Site Accidents in Illinois, do no hesitate; trust none but the attorneys at Carlson Bier. Rest assured with every new case comes a resilient commitment from us towards securing justice & fair compensation depending upon individual circumstances.

In cases such as these where swift actions following accidents play crucial roles toward receiving rightful settlements, being able to entrust an experienced law firm like Carlson Bier ensures alleviating some stress amid troubled times given proficient handling everything right from initial investigation upto final resolution.

Partner with us today for unparalleled advocacy aiming towards protecting your rights and navigating through complex laws regarding personal injury due Construction Site Accidents in Illinois. Curious about knowing what potentially might be worth your ongoing case? Hit the button below and find out straightway – because here at Carlon Bier, all deserving victims surpass monetary compensations; they rediscover assurances restoring lives back on track post-accidental mishaps!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Blue Mound Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Blue Mound

Areas of Practice in Blue Mound

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying skilled legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Medical Incompetence

Ensuring experienced legal representation for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, delivering expert legal assistance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Tumble Mishaps

Skilled in handling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal aid for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on helping patients of car accidents secure fair payout for hurts and damages.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Committed to providing representation for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Truck Crash

Extending experienced legal support for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recompense for harms.

Worksite Mishaps

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Damages

Committed to providing expert legal assistance for persons suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Proficient in handling cases for victims who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering restitution.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and expert legal support to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Impairment

Committed to supporting individuals with paralysis, offering specialized legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer