Construction Site Accident Attorney in Brookfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with the complex legalities surrounding construction site accidents, Brookfield residents turn to Carlson Bier. Our renowned law firm has vast experience in representing victims of various types of personal injury incidents, including intricate cases related to construction site accidents. We pride ourselves on our strategic approach in pursuit of fair compensation for our clients’ emotional and physical trauma. Understanding entirely how devastating such occurrences can be, we are committed to rendering legal services that account sensitively for each case’s unique circumstances. At Carlson Bier, each skilled attorney understands and abides by Illinois state laws while masterfully navigating through these often-complicated matters – translating them into comprehensible terms for your understanding and decision-making process. The depth of knowledge manifested by our lawyers ensures that individuals affected stand a significant chance at obtaining what’s rightfully theirs from insurance companies or faulty parties involved – uncompromised justice alongisde maximum applicable compensation within the statutory framework provided under Illinois Law. Turn towards expertise you trust; allow Carlson Bier handle your construction-site accident claims professionally and compassionately.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Brookfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are the go-to source for legal advice and representation in matters of personal injury law with a special focus on Construction Site Accidents. Located in Illinois, our main function is serving individuals who have been injured due to unsafe work conditions on construction sites. The realm of construction site accidents involves many intricacies requiring specialized knowledge that our attorneys bring to each case.

A construction site abounds with a host potential hazards such as injuries from falling objects, slips and falls due to uneven or insecure surfaces, electrocution or burns because of faulty wiring or malfunctioning equipment, machinery accidents, and exposure to toxic substances among others. At times these incidents can result into severe injuries leading to loss of income and expensive medical bills thereby increasing the burden on victims.

Numerous safety regulations exist under Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which are designed for protection of workers at construction sites. When an injury occurs on-site due factors that run contrary to these rules it may create grounds for personal injury claims.

Here at Carlson Bier, we comb through all aspects connected with your case meticulously:

– We assess your situation: Every case receives individual consideration because no two cases are alike.

– Gathering evidence: A comprehensive collection of facts surrounding the accident is vital; worksite photographs, eyewitness testimonies and OSHA violation reports make up part this task.

– Evaluate losses/damages: Beyond physical injuries, there could be trauma-related psychological issues needing therapy. Added long convalescence periods might mean huge wage losses – all this aggregate amount forms claim damage.

– Negotiating settlements: Many insurance firms may try minimizing payouts through techniques aiming reduction of liability attributions ultimately pushing down settlement accruals – Carlson Bier defangs such strategies effectively.

We understand that winning litigation battles often requires extra diligence during preparation phase hence we enter courtroom battle-ready in every case regardless its size complexity!

But why should you consider securing our services? We are experienced and dedicated professionals who can guide you through the complexities of Illinois’s law system, sparing you unnecessary stress during a difficult time. Carlson Bier provides:

– Free consultation: To assess your situation right at the onset with no obligation or charge to you.

– Exposure and experience: Backed by years of tackling personal injury cases we bring insightful experience that allows for effective representation.

– No-win no-fee policy: If we do not successfully secure compensation in your favor, there is absolutely no fee owed for our service.

Remember, justice delayed is justice denied. Do not suffer silently under burdening medical bills and lost wages amidst physical trauma owing to an on-site construction accident. Inside every courtroom across Illinois Carlson Bier ensures client interests find their rightful place – at forefront driving force behind every case presented fighting tooth nail optimum judgements!

Don’t allow your rights as a worker be trampled by negligent site owners or operators due negligent attitudes towards safety norms! Click on the button below to evaluate what your case might translate into monetary terms relieving financial strain thereby life moving forward becomes less burdensome journey fairness actualized in tangible meaningful way that spells victory for those deserving it most! Discover how much your construction site accident case could be worth with us – today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Brookfield Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Brookfield

Areas of Practice in Brookfield

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Giving professional legal services for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Physician Negligence

Providing expert legal representation for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Responsibility

Addressing cases involving problematic products, providing specialist legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Neglect

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Stumble Accidents

Expert in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to victims seeking compensation for their injuries.

Infant Harms

Offering legal guidance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Mishaps: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents get appropriate compensation for harms and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in providing legal assistance for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Big Rig Mishap

Providing expert legal services for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for harms.

Construction Site Accidents

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cerebral Damages

Specializing in ensuring expert legal services for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in managing cases for persons who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Neural Impairment

Dedicated to defending individuals with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer