FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Brookport

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re a victim of a construction site accident in Brookport, allow the distinguished Carlson Bier law firm to champion your cause. Accidents at construction sites can lead to severe personal injuries that require substantial financial support for treatments and recovery; a fact that is understood deeply by Carlson Bier. Their well-versed attorneys are highly skilled in Construction Site Accident law, offering an unparalleled level of expertise within this field. The attorneys at Carlson Bier navigate through complex issues with precision, ensuring their clients receive optimum compensation from responsible parties. With professionalism underpinning each phase of representation, they fight tenaciously for justice on behalf of their clients affected by Construction Site Accidents across Illinois – including Brookport’s cases too! Allowing the experienced hands like those found at Carlson Bier will provide peace of mind amidst an admittedly tumultuous time following such accidents. For reliable legal guidance beyond compare when it comes to confronting any issue related to serious accidents on construction sites across Illinois – consider reaching out to the seasoned professionals at Carlson Bier today.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Brookport Illinois

Carlson Bier, an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, understands the complexities and severe effects of construction site accidents. We pride ourselves on having a meticulous approach to these cases, aiming to guide our clients through not only the legal intricacies but also instill confidence by continuously providing educational insights along their journey for justice.

In many instances, construction sites can pose various hazards due to the use of heavy machinery and equipment. They may contribute to accidents such as falls from heights, trench collapse incidents, scaffold collapses or mishaps involving cranes. These catastrophic events often lead to serious injuries – fractures, amputations or even worse life-threatening situations like traumatic brain injuries or paralysis.

While all workplaces should maintain stringent health and safety standards, it’s particularly imperative within construction sectors due to obvious elevated risks involved. Here are some key points we ensure within our client’s case context:

1. Employer Negligence: A pivotal role is played by employers in preventing sources of potential workplace harm through proper maintenance and usage checks on devices utilized frequently.

2. Regulatory Compliance: Adherence to state laws and regulations is compulsory for any constructions organization for ensuring safe working environments.

3. Adequate Training: Construction workers must be appropriately trained about the possible scenarios related to the operation of machinery or overall worksite processes.

Even with appropriate safety measures intact sometimes unfortunate incidents do occur resulting in pain, suffering and disruption of daily activities for victims involved in construction site accidents. You need an advocate who will take on your employer or others responsible parties who negligibly put you into this situation.

The recovery phase can be stressful because bearing medical costs while fighting expensive legal battles is undoubtedly daunting. That is precisely where Carlson Bier steps into picture understanding empathetically how critical it becomes for our clients’ post-accident life structure searching justice therein leveraging powerful facts evidence reflecting truth behind supposed tragedies seeking rightful compensation that covers their incurred losses.

Our team specializes at adeptly navigating through medical claims, expert testimonies or dealing with insurance companies routines ensuring that each case is handled diligently resulting into chances of attaining maximum compensation for our affected clients.

Should you be a victim of construction site accident, bear in mind these crucial aspects:

1. Medical Care – Prompt and professional evaluation will not only lay the foundation for necessary treatment but also hold as an evidence while pushing your claim process forward.

2. Report Immediately: Injuries received on a construction site must be immediately reported to the manager or supervisor on duty.

3. Document Every Detail: From immediate aftermath to consequential expenses incurred due to injuries suffered- Everything should be well documented providing strong substantiating factors during legal proceedings.

All potential claimants need to remember a critical Illinois law stipulation concerning time limitation since it directly impacts their ability to claim rightful compensation. Any legal proceedings have to be initiated within certain specific deadlines termed “statute limitations”. Failure to file the action on time may lead to dismissal of said suit no matter how justified and meritorious it might actually be.

Navigating this journey by yourself might seem overwhelming which is exactly why Carlson Bier invites you, with open arms, into our family where we cherish values of trust, respect and commitment towards achieving justice together hoping at aiding you bouncing back from such traumatizing experiences towards embracing normalcy again.

Curious about what your case could potentially worth? Unveil this information by clicking below button thus initiating your first step towards unfolding justice seeking path.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Brookport Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Brookport

Areas of Practice in Brookport

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Fire Wounds

Providing specialist legal help for people of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Medical Misconduct

Extending professional legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering skilled legal support to victims affected by faulty goods.

Senior Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall & Stumble Occurrences

Professional in managing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their injuries.

Neonatal Wounds

Supplying legal aid for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Car Collisions

Crashes: Devoted to aiding clients of car accidents receive equitable payout for injuries and losses.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing representation for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Truck Collision

Ensuring professional legal advice for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for harms.

Construction Crashes

Committed to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or carelessness.

Neurological Traumas

Specializing in delivering expert legal representation for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Specialized in addressing cases for people who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unjust Death

Standing up for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and professional legal services to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Expert in advocating for patients with vertebral damage, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440