FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Casey

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

At Carlson Bier, we are a team of seasoned Construction Site Accident attorneys dedicated to protecting your rights in Casey. When you’re facing the aftermath of a construction mishap, it can be overwhelming coping with physical discomfort and mounting medical bills coupled with lost wages due to time away from work. At such moments, our legal experts step in to represent individuals like you who have been involved in construction accidents caused by negligence or unsafe working conditions. With undeterred focus and extensive experience handling various aspects related to/frequent within Construction Site Accidents, we strive for optimum outcomes on behalf of our clients. Leveraging our solid track record built over years through meticulous case preparations and aggressive courtroom advocacy—our reputation speaks volumes about delivering justice led by integrity throughout Illinois state including Casey location-coverage area(Please check if this complies with the law). Choosing Carlson Bier as your counsel not only ensures knowledgeable representation but also compassionate service directed towards helping you reclaim control over your life post-accident; partnering through every step until justice is served.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Casey Illinois

In the bustling state of Illinois, construction site accidents are unfortunately all too familiar. As per records, these incidents account for one in five worker deaths annually. Such a harsh reality prompts the need for expert legal representation by an experienced personal injury attorney. Welcome to Carlson Bier, your trusted advocate in fighting for justice after any form of construction site accident.

At Carlson Bier, we thoroughly understand the intricacies that surround this field of law. Our impressive wealth of expertise extends beyond simple slip-and-fall injuries. We cover other potential hazards like falling objects or equipment failure and inherent dangers involving scaffolding or ladder mishaps, electrocution incidents and accidents with heavy machinery to name a few.

• Protection Against Falling Injuries: Most common on-site mishap is fall from heights resulting in serious physical damage.

• Defense Against Heavy Machinery Accidents: Poor safety measures can lead to devastating injuries or even death.

• Legal Support For Scaffolding Failure: Companies that fail to establish structural security can be held responsible for damages.

Our primary role revolves around ensuring victims gain rightful compensation for their experiences – medical bills, wage loss during recovery period, rehabilitation costs and more significant elements like pain and suffering.

To achieve this end goal effectively:

1) We scrutinize every aspect of OSHA (Occupational Safety & Health Administration) regulations; as they play vital roles in determining liability in these cases.

2) Our team possesses keen observational skills essential enough to identify breaches in safety protocols which constituting negligence.

3) Analyzing extent of workplace injuries requires our meticulous attention-to-detail— an ability honed through years of continuous practice.

We also extend services pertaining to third-party liability claims; typically filed against non-employers who could be instrumental towards accident occurrence – unsafe working conditions imposed by job site owners or inappropriate actions incited by subcontractors among others.

Emblematic of our remarkable reputation in championing clients’ rights is the well-founded trust we’ve successfully built with innumerable victims. By combining proven methods with modern techniques, our attorneys help strategize ways to secure optimal settlement payouts incorporating all these factors. You can always rely on us while dealing with construction site accident aftermaths, knowing our structured approach aims at minimizing your stress while maximizing compensation.

So why choose Carlson Bier? The answer is simple: We are dedicated to securing justice for you— driven by relentless pursuit of providing rightful claim amounts that rightly account for circumstances encountered upon construction sites. Our perseverance and empathy are unparalleled in the industry; as we tirelessly endeavor towards ensuring adequate restitution for aggrieved parties.

Securing justice post tragedy need not be a journey embarked upon alone. With Carlson Bier—a distinguished Illinois-based personal injury law firm—rest assured, this legal battle transforms into an easier path maneuvered through shared countdowns in hopes of imminent victory. Bear witness to a professional and thorough legal walkthrough on dealing with unfortunate predicaments emerging from avoidable accidents at construction venues around the state.

Crucially important to remember is fighting against corporate giants isn’t easy—but it’s certainly not impossible either when hiring competent allies such as us! So remember, if you or a loved one has been injured working within the bounds of a construction field—we’re here for you!

At Carlson Bier, every single case matters and every client deserves personalized attention leading to optimum resolution outcomes. Don’t wait any longer – Click the button below now and determine how much your case could potentially be worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Casey Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Casey

Areas of Practice in Casey

Bicycle Accidents

Focused on legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Providing adept legal support for people of intense burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Healthcare Malpractice

Ensuring expert legal assistance for patients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal support to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Neglect

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall and Tumble Incidents

Expert in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking justice for their injuries.

Newborn Traumas

Supplying legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Accidents

Collisions: Committed to assisting sufferers of car accidents gain fair recompense for injuries and damages.

Bike Collisions

Committed to providing legal advice for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Semi Incident

Ensuring specialist legal services for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for harms.

Building Site Incidents

Concentrated on supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Head Harms

Focused on providing expert legal support for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Wounds

Specialized in dealing with cases for victims who have suffered wounds from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering restitution.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Neural Injury

Committed to advocating for individuals with paralysis, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440