...

Wrongful Death Attorney in Chatsworth

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the aftermath of a tragic wrongful death incident, individuals and families seek justice and closure. The complexity of such cases necessitates assistance from competent professionals – this is where we, Carlson Bier, come into the picture. Our extensive experience in handling wrongful death cases across Chatsworth sets us apart from others. We prioritize empathy along with skillful legal representation to ensure that your voice is heard amidst your pain and loss. Bearing witness to our diligent pursuit of rightful compensation are numerous clients who have found solace through verdicts in their favor over the years.

Our detailed knowledge about Illinois law aligns with our commitment towards comprehensive client assistance – navigating complex processes smoothly under unusual circumstances forms an integral part of our services at Carlson Bier.

Rest assured, every step taken by us will reinforce your belief that entrusting us was indeed the right decision. Nothing can compensate for irreplaceable loss but fighting alongside you for justice makes all the difference when coping with grief – let’s triumph together because Your Justice Matters at Carlson Bier!

About Carlson Bier

Wrongful Death Lawyers in Chatsworth Illinois

Offering stalwart representation backed by decades of experience, Carlson Bier is your dependable personal injury law firm that adjoins compassion with zealous advocacy. Predominant in the Illinois justice sector, we proceed beyond an ubiquitous legal counsel to assertively vindicate rights for families grappling from wrongful death tragedies.

Wrongful death refers to an instance where a person’s negligence or intentional act culminates in someone else’s demise. It is a devastating circumstance to enmesh in and often leaves numerous daunting questions in its wake. Am I entitled to file? Who can file this lawsuit? What damages are recoverable? We at Carlson Bier are committed not just to dispelling ambiguity but also ensuring you conquer every legal intricacy as fortified allies on your side.

Foundational eligibility includes being directly impacted – the decedent’s spouse, children or parents typically embody plaintiffs who can sue for fatal accidents, medical malpractice, negligent supervision and more. Though these cases operate under tenet compensation principles – including expenses incurred due to funeral preparations, loss of companionship or profession earning potential-it ensures that no family has finances pile onto their emotional burden.

The statute of limitations grants Illinois claimants two years following the incident date so swift action reciprocates as multiple advantages; securing critical evidence before they vanish or warp, accruing key witnesses recollections while still accurate yet fresh plus empowering us enough preparation timeline calibrating strategic approaches aggregately elevate case value.

Trials can prove tempestuous even interwoven with incredibly complex layers demanding specialized knowledge within different niches like medical professionals consulting on failed standard care issues. Confidential settlements renders another decisive factor since they alleviate prolonged stress and financial burdens associated with protracted proceedings allowing affected parties personal closure without fear of public scrutiny unlike trials outcomes exposed via court records.

Practically regimenting our meticulous efforts within each client brief evidently amplifies subsequent success rates; deeply probing liability factors determine not only what happened but why it took place, thoroughly assessing damages explore all possible loss angles reaching more comprehensive compensation.

Compassionate yet firm, each Carlson Bier attorney is persistently attentive to each query or concern dedicating unrushed time coaching clients through their journey expunging that inherently nerve-wracking overwhelming feeling synonymous with legal proceedings. Notably our fees fluidly accommodate onto your recovery hence any economic constraints ought not dissuade you from procuring the justice rightfully belonging to you.

Brief as this overview may be, it ultimately stands a beacon call of hope appearing amidst the worst tragedy anyone possibly endures. Embrace us into your journey letting you draw strength from our resilient networks and formidable expertise drawn from expansive Illinois jurisprudence practice. Extract full advantage maximally tapping into personal injury advocacy leaders’ wealth aligning recovery paths towards deserved peace and justice.

Click on the button below and discover how we can help delineate an estimate of what your case value might extend unto; perhaps marking the first step in commencing a cathartic process towards solacing reparation for your unfortunate loss.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Chatsworth Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Wrongful Death FAQ​

Wrongful death occurs when a person’s death is caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person.

The following people may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit:

  • The spouse or children of the deceased
  • The parents of the deceased
  • The siblings of the deceased
  • The personal representative of the deceased’s estate

To prove a wrongful death claim in Illinois, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:

  • The defendant owed the deceased a duty of care.
  • The defendant breached that duty of care.
  • The breach of duty caused the death of the deceased.
  • The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the death of the deceased.

In a wrongful death lawsuit in Illinois, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include lost wages, medical expenses, and funeral expenses.
  • Non-pecuniary damages: These damages are designed to compensate the plaintiff for the non-financial losses they have suffered as a result of the death of the deceased. This could include pain and suffering, loss of consortium, and loss of parental guidance.

The statute of limitations for wrongful death lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the death to file a lawsuit.

If you have any questions about your legal rights or options after a wrongful death, you should contact an experienced wrongful death attorney.

All Attorney Services in Chatsworth

Areas of Practice in Chatsworth

Cycling Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or risky conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending skilled legal advice for victims of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Hospital Malpractice

Extending dedicated legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Obligation

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, delivering specialist legal support to individuals affected by defective items.

Aged Abuse

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Tumble and Stumble Injuries

Expert in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking restitution for their harm.

Infant Damages

Delivering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Crashes

Collisions: Focused on supporting clients of car accidents obtain just payout for wounds and impairment.

Motorbike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending professional legal assistance for drivers involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Dedicated to assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Neurological Harms

Focused on providing expert legal assistance for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at handling cases for persons who have suffered harms from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Jogger Collisions

Committed to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Unfair Loss

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and skilled legal services to ensure redress.

Backbone Injury

Committed to advocating for victims with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer