FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Colfax

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Accidents caused by defective products are distressing. Sufferers in Colfax looking for exemplary legal representation to seek justice should consider Carlson Bier – an illustrious Illinois based law firm reputed for its prowess in Products Liability cases. Our seasoned attorneys employ a rigorous and detailed approach, scrutinizing every facet of your case to optimize the possibilities of receiving maximum compensation. We take it personally when manufacturers exhibit negligence leading to harm or loss. Our fierce commitment transcends towards battling these entities ensuring they take accountability for their actions or lack thereof, specifically regarding consumer safety obligations.

With Carlson Bier on your side, you can anticipate dedicated advocacy focused on safeguarding your interests while navigating complexity with ease. Our considerable experience coupled with an impressive history of victorious outcomes underscores our capability as advocates in Products Liability matters.

We understand that each case presents unique scenarios; hence we offer tailored strategies defining clarity and direction necessary for victories inside and outside courtrooms’ intimidating environments. Choosing Carlson Bier guarantees relentless pursuit till justice is served because here at Carlson Bier- Your Fight Is Our Fight!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Colfax Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we ardently champion the rights of individuals who have sustained injuries due to defective or harmful products. As a personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we possess an acute understanding of Products Liability laws and leverage this knowledge to ensure you receive the compensation you deserve audaciously representing your best interests.

Products liability refers to holding manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers—virtually any party that made the product available for use—accountable when their products cause injury or harm. This area of law pivots on three primary claims: defectively manufactured products, defectively designed products and failure to provide adequate warnings or instructions.

In circumstances involving defectively manufactured products—the situations where errors occur in manufacturing process—it’s crucially important that there was nothing intrinsically wrong with the product design itself but rather issues arose during its creation at factory which kept it from functioning as intended. The second type revolves around ineffectual designs—a scenario wherein even if the item has been made perfectly according to plan, usage still poses danger due to innate flaws within its blueprint. Lastly, companies failing to provide clear instructions about safe handling or neglecting to alert consumers regarding potential risks also fall under enforcement mechanism.

Being cognizant about these distinctions can offer invaluable help in comprehending how Products Liability Laws function:

• Resulting Injury: You may have a claim only when you suffer actual injuries.

• Timing Matters: Prompt action is imperative following an accident as statutes of limitations kick in post-injury.

• Product Usage: If you were using the product for its intended purpose without aberration, then establishing fault becomes easier.

Illinois Products Liability also operates under two doctrines commonly known as Strict Liability and Negligence Laws:

-Under strict liability theory manufacturers are held responsible regardless of whether they performed necessary precautions or not.

-Negligence posits negligence by manufacturer has led directly towards accidents. Precautions might include guidelines for proper usage, safety mechanisms and more extensive testing.

At Carlson Bier, our highly experienced team of personal injury attorneys is equipped with the versatility and proficiency necessary to navigate these multifaceted aspects of Products Liability laws, ensuring that your rights are staunchly protected.

Throughout each stage of your case—from consultation to settlement—our commitment remains unwavering: to bring you the best possible outcome while providing a level of personalized service that not only meets but surpasses your expectations. Our rigorous attention to detail ensures we thoroughly investigate every potential angle; because at Carlson Bier, your experience matters as much as the result.

We believe in empowering our clients through knowledge delivery. As such, we provide an extensive library full of helpful resources designed exclusively with our clientele in mind—browse everything from educational blog posts to legal term glossaries on our website anytime. Every decision made will be one shared between us – always leaving final say up to you with thorough guidance alongside throughout entire process until you confidently reach settlements satisfying both parties involved.

Our proactive approach means we aim at negotiating maximum settlements swiftly yet never shy out from trial whenever necessary so as they can regain control over their life without delay. Remember, prospective compensation covers not just medical expenses but also factors like emotional distress or lost wages during recovery phase itself; something especially critical when injuries prove long-term debilitating ones.

In summary, no matter how complex your products liability case may seem, trust that our expert legal team at Carlson Bier will stop at nothing less than delivering justice owed right back towards them – all without costing anything upfront since working based entirely upon contingency method (meaning only getting paid if/when winning cases). Explore all available options by clicking button beneath here today and discover exactly how much potentially yours right now – surely might surprise even yourself! Just remember: when it comes down dealing law firms committed genuinely caring about every single client served diligently professionally unmatched else within industry there simply is none other than us!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Colfax Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Colfax

Areas of Practice in Colfax

Cycling Mishaps

Expert in legal services for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Giving adept legal advice for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Physician Negligence

Delivering specialist legal services for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Accountability

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, delivering skilled legal guidance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Elder Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Stumble Mishaps

Expert in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking redress for their injuries.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal help for households affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Incidents: Concentrated on helping individuals of car accidents secure reasonable payout for hurts and damages.

Scooter Accidents

Focused on providing legal services for individuals involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Trucking Crash

Offering specialist legal representation for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for injuries.

Construction Incidents

Concentrated on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Dedicated to extending expert legal advice for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Traumas

Specialized in tackling cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Collisions

Dedicated to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Loss

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and adept legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Spine Damage

Specializing in advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal support to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440