Car Accident Attorney in Crestwood

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a car accident can be confusing and overwhelming, often leaving victims in dire need of professional legal advice. Offering exceptional services to Crestwood residents, Carlson Bier prides itself on its ability to effectively handle a myriad of auto accident cases – fighting tirelessly for clients’ rights while they focus on recovery. Realizing that every incident has its unique circumstances, we cater to each client’s individual needs with precision. Our unwavering dedication towards achieving optimum results embodies what sets us apart as an acclaimed Car Accident attorney group within Illinois state boundary and beyond it. We pledge legal guidance delivered with utmost transparency and professionalism; keeping your best interest at heart always remains our priority. Let the impeccable reputation Carlson Bier has cultivated over decades work in your favor if you seek justice following a car accident—an ideal choice void ambiguity or compromise when dealing personal injury law complexities.

About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Crestwood Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the complexities of auto accident cases and empathize with victims who face overwhelming circumstances. As a premier personal injury law firm in Illinois, our expertise lies firmly in representing individuals who have sustained injuries as a result of car accidents. A collision is more than just physical; it presents financial commitments that could turn your world upside down overnight.

Car accidents often lead to hefty medical expenses, prolonged rehabilitative care, diminishing income due to inability to work and sometimes permanent disabilities which can alter one’s lifestyle forever. Understanding these implications gives us an unwavering commitment to help you navigate this trying time by ensuring justice is duly served.

There are two main types of compensation victims might be entitled to in a car accident – economic and non-economic damages. Economic damages refer to compensations for tangible costs such as medical bills, property damage and lost wages. Non-economic damages cover intangible losses – pain and suffering endured by victims due to their injuries, psychological trauma or loss of enjoyment from normal life activities.

Understanding the mechanism behind insurance companies’ operations can also culminate into fair settlements for victims because insurers’ primary aim is typically reducing payouts rather than victim welfare. Our legal prowess enables us on how best to negotiate with insurance companies ensuring your rights are not violated but upheld.

Importantly, each accident has unique aspects making each case distinctively different hence it does not suffices saying that all cases should be approached similarly. For instance:

– How did the accident happen? Defined as liability, it pertains who caused the accident – crucial information determining fault.

– What type of injuries were involved? Specific injuries lead to specified amounts awarded as compensation.

– What sort of treatment was received post-accident? Medical evidence plays an instrumental role substantiating claims made following the incident.

These are some key factors shaping directionality of car accident claims alongside others such as availability/credibility among witnesses or whether claimant had pre-existing conditions. Nonetheless, Carlson Bier braces itself elevating your plight to become victors amidst such adversities.

When it comes to time limitation for filing accident claims, the clock begins ticking immediately after an accident and in Illinois you’ve 2 years from day of accident or last receipt of injury-related medical treatment (whichever’s later) to file personal injury claims.

At Carlson Bier, our ethical principles restrict us from giving false impressions on being present within regions we do not have physical presence hence offering services statewide without particular localization tags associated with some personnel. We are readily available across the state maintaining crucial transparency vital when establishing trustful relationships with clients.

If your life has been disturbed due to a car collision, remember that legal guidance can make all difference between getting compensated robustly versus accepting underpaying settlements seeking closure hastily. As complex as auto accident cases might seem, journeying this path isn’t meant for laymen but necessitates detailed understanding which we diligently possess fulfilling our vocation at Carlson Bier – always embracing victims’ needs by walking beside them through murky periods post-accidents.

Please bear in mind that understanding how much your case could be worth requires an individualized assessment and good judgment by experienced attorneys. Knowing this value assists tuning expectations while dealing with insurance companies or even courts if needed. Attaining a full grasp about this aspect becomes exceedingly beneficial towards successful completion of claiming procedures.

Hence we heartily invite you take advantage of our free consultation service by clicking on button below where one of our seasoned car accident lawyers would provide detailed analysis regarding potential value of claim based upon specific dynamics revolving around each unique case. At Carlson Bier each solicitation is considered promising opportunity where achieving justice equates ultimate satisfaction transcending beyond mere profession into realm of passion-driven missions fighting diligently for rights enabling healthier futures post-car accidents.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crestwood Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

     

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Crestwood

Areas of Practice in Crestwood

Cycling Crashes

Dedicated to legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or hazardous conditions.

Burn Damages

Extending professional legal support for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by occurrences or indifference.

Clinical Negligence

Delivering expert legal advice for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Fault

Handling cases involving defective products, providing expert legal assistance to individuals affected by defective items.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Stumble & Stumble Mishaps

Expert in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking recovery for their suffering.

Birth Wounds

Supplying legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Mishaps: Focused on supporting patients of car accidents secure fair compensation for damages and destruction.

Bike Accidents

Focused on providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Semi Mishap

Providing specialist legal advice for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recovery for injuries.

Building Accidents

Focused on advocating for laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Neurological Traumas

Expert in delivering compassionate legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Specialized in managing cases for individuals who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Undeserved Fatality

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Injury

Specializing in assisting persons with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer