...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Effingham

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Trustworthy, professional and committed, Carlson Bier is your reliable choice for dog bite injury representation in Illinois. We understand the trauma and complications these events can cause. As specialists in personal injury law, we have garnered a strong reputation for our proven approach to dog bite cases – an accolade that sets us apart from others. Within Illinois’ legal community, our team’s local knowledge shines through by ensuring you receive legally sound advice with every consultation.

We place high importance on building trust with clients within the Effingham area by navigating them through intricate statutes around dog bite injuries. Our experienced attorneys take action against responsible parties – assuring compensation for medical bills, pain & suffering or lost wages caused due to such incidents.

Promising rigorous attention to detail and a high standard of professionalism at all stages of your case; when it comes to comprehensive legal support after a disheartening experience like a dog attack in Effingham — Carlson Bier stands out as an optimal choice.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Effingham Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we believe in empowering every individual with a deep understanding of their legal rights and options. One specific area of personal injury law that often goes overlooked is Dog Bite Injuries. Every year in Illinois, thousands fall victim to severe dog bite injuries leading not just to physical trauma but also mental distress and financial burdens associated with extended medical treatments.

To make this matter more comprehensible for the layman, potential victims and claimants need to understand what constitutes a Dog Bite Injury under the state’s legal framework. According to Illinois statutes, any individual who suffers an injury due to being bitten or attacked by another person’s dog can file for a dog bite lawsuit provided they were legally allowed on the premises where the incident took place, and didn’t provoke the dog into attacking them.

Within our extensive practice as Personal Injury Attorneys at Carlson Bier, we have identified certain key elements which play crucial roles in determining the outcome of your case:

– Clear Evidence: Document everything from the moment you’ve been bitten till when you receive your final treatment. Photos, veterinary records if available, medical reports – all these can work as strong evidence.

– Severity of Injury: The extent of your injury plays a big role when it comes down to compensation amounts.

– Owner’s Negligence: Was there prior knowledge about the dog’s aggressive behavior? If yes then proving owner negligence becomes easier.

– Direct Linkage: It must be proven without reasonable doubt that harm was caused directly by said dog attack.

Understanding these factors can help paint a clearer picture before you commence with litigation. Recognizing how damaging a Dog Bite Injury could be – ranging from permanent disfigurement and psychological trauma – triggers us to commit resolutely towards getting justice served appropriately.

Apart from providing meticulous representation tailored specifically around each case scenario’s unique needs and objectives, one major advantage of having Carlson Bier at your side is our vast network within the medical profession. This becomes particularly beneficial in such personal injury cases where medical treatment reports form a significant part of evidence and could potentially swing the case in your favor.

Being resident-friendly, our specialized legal services extend throughout Illinois but remember: without implying that we are located there, it’s crucial to acknowledge that we honor the state law which forbids false advertisement of physical office locations – compliance is always utmost for us at Carlson Bier no matter what.

After detailed insights into the intricacies involved around Dog Bite Injuries within Illinois’s legal framework, you’re probably wondering, ‘how much my case can be really worth?’

That question is best answered by taking the first step towards understanding your rights and consulting our dedicated team of experienced Personal Injury Attorneys. Click on the button below to find out how much your case may be worth in compensation. Get appropriate justice served – because you deserve nothing less than that.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Effingham Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Effingham

Areas of Practice in Effingham

Pedal Cycle Collisions

Dedicated to legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Burn Injuries

Offering adept legal assistance for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Delivering specialist legal services for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Fault

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing professional legal services to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to abuse in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Slip Injuries

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking justice for their damages.

Newborn Damages

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Collisions: Devoted to helping patients of car accidents obtain fair compensation for hurts and damages.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Specializing in providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Big Rig Crash

Ensuring specialist legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Concentrated on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Cerebral Traumas

Dedicated to extending professional legal assistance for clients suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at tackling cases for people who have suffered injuries from dog bites or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and professional legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Damage

Dedicated to representing clients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​